MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4366810116 · doi:10.1353/rss.2010.0020

Sophomoric

2010· article· en· W4366810116 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Peter Stone

Notice bibliographique

RevueRussell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiquePhilosophy and Theoretical Science
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNoticeSpellingAnnalsClassicsPhilosophyLibrary scienceHistoryLawPolitical scienceComputer scienceLinguistics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

September 25, 2010 (2:45 pm) C:\Users\Milt\Desktop\backup copy of Ken's G\WPData\TYPE3001\russell 30,1 032 red corrected.wpd 90 Reviews SOPHOMORIC Peter Stone Center for Ethics and Public ATairs / Tulane U. New Orleans, la 70118, usa pstone@tulane.edu Jyotish Ch. Basak. Bertrand Russell’s Socio-Political Ideas. New Delhi: Northern Book Centre, 2008. Pp. xii, 146. isbn: 978-8172112547. Rs. 500. There really is no better word for describing the book Bertrand Russell’s SocioPolitical Ideas than “sophomoric”. The author, Jyotish Basak, apparently holds a ph.d. from Aligarh Muslim University. He is currently a reader in the philosophy department of the University of North Bengal, and has published a previous book dealing with ethical issues surrounding human genetics. And yet despite these seemingly reasonable credentials, Basak has produced the sort of book I might expect an undergraduate student to write. And not a particularly bright one, either. While reading Basak’s book, it is impossible not to notice the grammatical September 25, 2010 (2:45 pm) C:\Users\Milt\Desktop\backup copy of Ken's G\WPData\TYPE3001\russell 30,1 032 red corrected.wpd Reviews 91 and spelling errors which plague almost every page. Basak’s publisher, Northern Book Centre, claims to be “Publishers of Scholarly Reference Books”. But at this particular publishing company, either nobodyknowshowtooperatethespelling and grammar checker on a word-processing programme, or else no one is fully proWcient in English. I’ve had students who write papers with this many typos, but to the best of my knowledge none of them have ever published two books. One might think it unfair to hold Basak responsible for the incompetence of his publisher. Perhaps, but it is certainly fair to hold him responsible for the content of the book he allegedly wrote. Why do I say “allegedly”? Well, consider his description of Russell’s Autobiography. He writes, “In his Autobiography Russell mentioned three passions, which were although simple, yet overwhelmingly strong, that governed his life. These passions are: the longing for love, the search for knowledge, and unbearable pity for the suTering of mankind” (p. 3). He quotes Russell immediately thereafter, apparently hoping that no one would notice that he has been quoting Russell, with minor word changes, all along. The very next paragraph reads as follows: He has given three reasons for his passion for love. First, he sought it because it brings ecstasy—ecstasy so great that he would often have sacriWced all the rest of his life for a few hours of this joy. Second, love relieves loneliness. Third, in the union of love he had seen, “in a mystic miniature, the preWguring vision of the heaven that saints and poets have imagined”. (P. 3) Anyone who loves Russell’s Autobiography, especially its beautiful prologue, will recognize these words, which Basak would like us to believe are his own. And so it goes for the next two paragraphs, until there is no more of Russell’s prologue left to plagiarize. A minor oversight? Here’s Basak’s description of anarchism: The modern Anarchism is associated with belief in the communal ownership of land and capital. In this respect it is akin to Socialism. Socialism and Anarchist Communism alike have arisen from the perception that private capital is a source of tyranny by certain individuals over others. The diTerence in them is that whereas orthodox Socialism believes that the individual will become free if the state becomes the sole capitalist, Anarchists do not subscribe to this view. Anarchists fear that in that case the state might merely inherit the tyrannical propensities of the private capitalists. Accordingly, it seeks for a means of reconciling communal ownership with the utmost possible diminution in the powers of the state, and indeed ultimately with the complete abolition of the state. (P. 27) And here’s Russell’s description of anarchism in Roads to Freedomz: The modern Anarchism … is associated with belief in the communal ownership of land and capital, and is thus in an important respect akin to Socialism.… Socialism and Anarchist Communism alike have arisen from the perception that private capital is a source of tyranny by certain individuals over...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,791
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,000

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,000
Communication savante0,0050,003
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,7910,734

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,032
Tête enseignante GPT0,327
Écart entre enseignants0,295 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueRussell the Journal of Bertrand Russell StudiesMême sujetPhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceTravaux en français237 207