MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366810116 · doi:10.1353/rss.2010.0020

Sophomoric

2010· article· en· W4366810116 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Peter Stone

Bibliographic record

VenueRussell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPhilosophy and Theoretical Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoticeSpellingAnnalsClassicsPhilosophyLibrary scienceHistoryLawPolitical scienceComputer scienceLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

September 25, 2010 (2:45 pm) C:\Users\Milt\Desktop\backup copy of Ken's G\WPData\TYPE3001\russell 30,1 032 red corrected.wpd 90 Reviews SOPHOMORIC Peter Stone Center for Ethics and Public ATairs / Tulane U. New Orleans, la 70118, usa pstone@tulane.edu Jyotish Ch. Basak. Bertrand Russell’s Socio-Political Ideas. New Delhi: Northern Book Centre, 2008. Pp. xii, 146. isbn: 978-8172112547. Rs. 500. There really is no better word for describing the book Bertrand Russell’s SocioPolitical Ideas than “sophomoric”. The author, Jyotish Basak, apparently holds a ph.d. from Aligarh Muslim University. He is currently a reader in the philosophy department of the University of North Bengal, and has published a previous book dealing with ethical issues surrounding human genetics. And yet despite these seemingly reasonable credentials, Basak has produced the sort of book I might expect an undergraduate student to write. And not a particularly bright one, either. While reading Basak’s book, it is impossible not to notice the grammatical September 25, 2010 (2:45 pm) C:\Users\Milt\Desktop\backup copy of Ken's G\WPData\TYPE3001\russell 30,1 032 red corrected.wpd Reviews 91 and spelling errors which plague almost every page. Basak’s publisher, Northern Book Centre, claims to be “Publishers of Scholarly Reference Books”. But at this particular publishing company, either nobodyknowshowtooperatethespelling and grammar checker on a word-processing programme, or else no one is fully proWcient in English. I’ve had students who write papers with this many typos, but to the best of my knowledge none of them have ever published two books. One might think it unfair to hold Basak responsible for the incompetence of his publisher. Perhaps, but it is certainly fair to hold him responsible for the content of the book he allegedly wrote. Why do I say “allegedly”? Well, consider his description of Russell’s Autobiography. He writes, “In his Autobiography Russell mentioned three passions, which were although simple, yet overwhelmingly strong, that governed his life. These passions are: the longing for love, the search for knowledge, and unbearable pity for the suTering of mankind” (p. 3). He quotes Russell immediately thereafter, apparently hoping that no one would notice that he has been quoting Russell, with minor word changes, all along. The very next paragraph reads as follows: He has given three reasons for his passion for love. First, he sought it because it brings ecstasy—ecstasy so great that he would often have sacriWced all the rest of his life for a few hours of this joy. Second, love relieves loneliness. Third, in the union of love he had seen, “in a mystic miniature, the preWguring vision of the heaven that saints and poets have imagined”. (P. 3) Anyone who loves Russell’s Autobiography, especially its beautiful prologue, will recognize these words, which Basak would like us to believe are his own. And so it goes for the next two paragraphs, until there is no more of Russell’s prologue left to plagiarize. A minor oversight? Here’s Basak’s description of anarchism: The modern Anarchism is associated with belief in the communal ownership of land and capital. In this respect it is akin to Socialism. Socialism and Anarchist Communism alike have arisen from the perception that private capital is a source of tyranny by certain individuals over others. The diTerence in them is that whereas orthodox Socialism believes that the individual will become free if the state becomes the sole capitalist, Anarchists do not subscribe to this view. Anarchists fear that in that case the state might merely inherit the tyrannical propensities of the private capitalists. Accordingly, it seeks for a means of reconciling communal ownership with the utmost possible diminution in the powers of the state, and indeed ultimately with the complete abolition of the state. (P. 27) And here’s Russell’s description of anarchism in Roads to Freedomz: The modern Anarchism … is associated with belief in the communal ownership of land and capital, and is thus in an important respect akin to Socialism.… Socialism and Anarchist Communism alike have arisen from the perception that private capital is a source of tyranny by certain individuals over...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.609

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussell the Journal of Bertrand Russell StudiesSame topicPhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceFrench-language works237,207