MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4366831744 · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kead104.228

P187 Safety and efficacy of ixekizumab treatment in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: 3-year results from the COAST programme

2023· article· en· W4366831744 sur OpenAlexaff
Atul Deodhar, Denis Poddubnyy, Proton Rahman, Rebecca Bolce, Soyi Liu Leage, Andris Kronbergs, Caroline Johnson, Ann N. Leung, Désirée van der Heijde

Notice bibliographique

RevueLara D. Veeken · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Établissements canadiensMemorial University of Newfoundland
Organismes subventionnairesUCB PharmaBiogenEli Lilly and CompanyPfizerNational Psoriasis FoundationAmgen
Mots-clésIxekizumabMedicinePlaceboInternal medicineSecukinumabPathologyAlternative medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background/Aims Ixekizumab (IXE) has demonstrated efficacy at week (wk) 16 which was maintained through 2 years (yrs) and was associated with a consistent safety profile in patients (pts) with r- and nr-axSpA, who are bDMARD-naïve and TNFi-experienced. We aimed to report safety and efficacy from the COAST programme at 3 yrs: 1 yr of the originating studies (COAST-V/W/X) and 2 yrs of COAST-Y. Methods COAST-Y (NCT03129100) is the phase 3, long-term extension study of the 3 originating studies COAST-V/W/X. Pts continued with the dose received at the end of the originating trial at week (wk) 52, either with 80 mg IXE every 4 wks (Q4W) or every 2 wks (Q2W). Pts assigned to adalimumab (ADA) or placebo (PBO) were re-randomised to IXE Q4W or Q2W at wk 16 in COAST-V and -W. Pts who received PBO for 52 wks in COAST-X were switched to IXE Q4W to continue in COAST-Y. Starting at wk 116 (wk 64 of COAST-Y), pts receiving IXE Q4W could have their dose escalated to Q2W based on investigator's opinion. This analysis focused on pts receiving ≥1 dose of IXE Q4W, observed data while on IXE Q2W dose escalation are excluded. Continuous data are summarised as observed. Safety data while on IXE were analysed for pts who received ≥1 dose of IXE; observed data while on PBO or ADA are excluded. Results A total of 932 pts received ≥1 dose of IXE, 414 received ≥1 dose of IXE Q4W, and 562/932 (60%) pts completed 3 yrs of follow-up (PBO→IXE Q4W, 63/119 (53%); ADA→IXE Q4W, 29/44 (66%); and IXE Q4W→IXE Q4W, 114/251(45%)). Through 3 yrs, the most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events were infections [incidence rate (IR) 25.7/100 patient years (PY)] and injection site reactions [IR 7.4/100 PY], the majority of which were mild/moderate in severity. Serious adverse events were reported at an IR of 4.8/100 PY, of which osteoarthritis was the most frequent at 0.4/100 PY. A total of 3 deaths were reported among all pts who received ≥1 dose of IXE [IR 0.1/100 PY]. For all patients, baseline disease activity (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score; ASDAS) was high. A similar improvement in disease activity through 3 yrs was confirmed across additional efficacy endpoints. Conclusion This analysis in COAST-Y demonstrated that the safety profile is consistent with the established safety profile, with no new safety signals observed. Patients on IXE Q4W had sustained improvement through 3 years. Disclosure A. Deodhar: Consultancies; A. Deodhar has served as a speaker and/or consultant for: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Galapagos NV, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma. D. Poddubnyy: Shareholder/stock ownership; D. Poddubnyy has served as a speaker and/or consultant for: AbbVie, BIOCAD, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis, and UCB Pharma. Grants/research support; D.P. has received grant and/or research support from: AbbVie, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, and Pfizer. P. Rahman: Consultancies; P. Rahman has served as a speaker for: Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, Novartis, and Pfizer. Grants/research support; P.R. has received grant and/or research support from: Janssen and Novartis. R. Bolce: Shareholder/stock ownership; R. Bolce is an employee and shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company. S. Liu Leage: Shareholder/stock ownership; S. Liu-Leage is an employee and shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company. A. Kronbergs: Shareholder/stock ownership; A. Kronbergs is an employee and shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company. C. Johnson: Shareholder/stock ownership; C. Johnson is an employee and shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company. A. Leung: Corporate appointments; A. Leung is an employee of: Syneos Health; and a contractor for: Eli Lilly and Company. D. van der Heijde: Consultancies; D. van der Heijde has served as a consultant for: AbbVie, Bayer Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cyxone, Eisai, Eli Lilly and Company, Galapagos NV, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma. Other; D. van der Heijde is the director of: Imaging Rheumatology BV. A. Kiprianos (Non-author Presenter): Shareholder/stock ownership; A. Kiprianos is an employee and shareholder in Lilly.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,011

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,002
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,123
Tête enseignante GPT0,334
Écart entre enseignants0,211 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueLara D. VeekenMême sujetHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeTravaux en français237 207