MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P187 Safety and efficacy of ixekizumab treatment in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: 3-year results from the COAST programme

2023· article· en· W4366831744 on OpenAlexaff
Atul Deodhar, Denis Poddubnyy, Proton Rahman, Rebecca Bolce, Soyi Liu Leage, Andris Kronbergs, Caroline Johnson, Ann N. Leung, Désirée van der Heijde

Bibliographic record

VenueLara D. Veeken · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersUCB PharmaBiogenEli Lilly and CompanyPfizerNational Psoriasis FoundationAmgen
KeywordsIxekizumabMedicinePlaceboInternal medicineSecukinumabPathologyAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background/Aims Ixekizumab (IXE) has demonstrated efficacy at week (wk) 16 which was maintained through 2 years (yrs) and was associated with a consistent safety profile in patients (pts) with r- and nr-axSpA, who are bDMARD-naïve and TNFi-experienced. We aimed to report safety and efficacy from the COAST programme at 3 yrs: 1 yr of the originating studies (COAST-V/W/X) and 2 yrs of COAST-Y. Methods COAST-Y (NCT03129100) is the phase 3, long-term extension study of the 3 originating studies COAST-V/W/X. Pts continued with the dose received at the end of the originating trial at week (wk) 52, either with 80 mg IXE every 4 wks (Q4W) or every 2 wks (Q2W). Pts assigned to adalimumab (ADA) or placebo (PBO) were re-randomised to IXE Q4W or Q2W at wk 16 in COAST-V and -W. Pts who received PBO for 52 wks in COAST-X were switched to IXE Q4W to continue in COAST-Y. Starting at wk 116 (wk 64 of COAST-Y), pts receiving IXE Q4W could have their dose escalated to Q2W based on investigator's opinion. This analysis focused on pts receiving ≥1 dose of IXE Q4W, observed data while on IXE Q2W dose escalation are excluded. Continuous data are summarised as observed. Safety data while on IXE were analysed for pts who received ≥1 dose of IXE; observed data while on PBO or ADA are excluded. Results A total of 932 pts received ≥1 dose of IXE, 414 received ≥1 dose of IXE Q4W, and 562/932 (60%) pts completed 3 yrs of follow-up (PBO→IXE Q4W, 63/119 (53%); ADA→IXE Q4W, 29/44 (66%); and IXE Q4W→IXE Q4W, 114/251(45%)). Through 3 yrs, the most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events were infections [incidence rate (IR) 25.7/100 patient years (PY)] and injection site reactions [IR 7.4/100 PY], the majority of which were mild/moderate in severity. Serious adverse events were reported at an IR of 4.8/100 PY, of which osteoarthritis was the most frequent at 0.4/100 PY. A total of 3 deaths were reported among all pts who received ≥1 dose of IXE [IR 0.1/100 PY]. For all patients, baseline disease activity (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score; ASDAS) was high. A similar improvement in disease activity through 3 yrs was confirmed across additional efficacy endpoints. Conclusion This analysis in COAST-Y demonstrated that the safety profile is consistent with the established safety profile, with no new safety signals observed. Patients on IXE Q4W had sustained improvement through 3 years. Disclosure A. Deodhar: Consultancies; A. Deodhar has served as a speaker and/or consultant for: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Galapagos NV, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma. D. Poddubnyy: Shareholder/stock ownership; D. Poddubnyy has served as a speaker and/or consultant for: AbbVie, BIOCAD, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis, and UCB Pharma. Grants/research support; D.P. has received grant and/or research support from: AbbVie, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, and Pfizer. P. Rahman: Consultancies; P. Rahman has served as a speaker for: Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, Novartis, and Pfizer. Grants/research support; P.R. has received grant and/or research support from: Janssen and Novartis. R. Bolce: Shareholder/stock ownership; R. Bolce is an employee and shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company. S. Liu Leage: Shareholder/stock ownership; S. Liu-Leage is an employee and shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company. A. Kronbergs: Shareholder/stock ownership; A. Kronbergs is an employee and shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company. C. Johnson: Shareholder/stock ownership; C. Johnson is an employee and shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company. A. Leung: Corporate appointments; A. Leung is an employee of: Syneos Health; and a contractor for: Eli Lilly and Company. D. van der Heijde: Consultancies; D. van der Heijde has served as a consultant for: AbbVie, Bayer Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cyxone, Eisai, Eli Lilly and Company, Galapagos NV, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma. Other; D. van der Heijde is the director of: Imaging Rheumatology BV. A. Kiprianos (Non-author Presenter): Shareholder/stock ownership; A. Kiprianos is an employee and shareholder in Lilly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLara D. VeekenSame topicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207