MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4367834190 · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.17522

Gestational surrogacy for women with recurrent pregnancy loss due to refractory chronic histiocytic intervillositis

2023· article· en· W4367834190 sur OpenAlexaff
Emily F. Cornish, Claudia A. A. Belardo, Roger W. Turnell, Thomas McDonnell, David Williams

Notice bibliographique

RevueBJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Alberta
Organismes subventionnairesUniversity College LondonMedical Research CouncilNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchVersus ArthritisMcDonald's Corporation
Mots-clésMedicinePregnancyObstetricsLive birthMiscarriageGynecologyContext (archaeology)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Chronic histiocytic intervillositis (CHI) is a rare placental disorder that affects approximately 1 in 600 pregnancies.1 It is diagnosed when at least 5% of the intervillous space is occupied by maternal CD68+ immune cells (histiocytes) and is often accompanied by massive perivillous fibrin deposition.2 CHI is strongly associated with miscarriage (24%), stillbirth (29%), fetal growth restriction (72%) and preterm birth (68%).2 It carries a high risk of recurrence in subsequent pregnancies.1, 2 The aetiology of CHI is unclear, but its association with maternal autoimmunity and its histological similarity to rejected solid organ allografts suggest a maternal immune 'rejection' of the placenta.3 While maternal immunosuppression reduces the histological severity of CHI and can improve live birth rate,4 some patients have refractory disease in which every successive pregnancy is affected. Eventually, some of these women resort to gestational surrogacy. There is, however, only one published case of successful surrogate pregnancy in this context.5 Here, we report the outcomes of 17 surrogate pregnancies in which the embryos came from 13 women with recurrent adverse pregnancy outcomes due to CHI. Women with one or more histologically proven cases of CHI who had subsequently undergone IVF and gestational surrogacy were eligible for inclusion. Eligible women were identified through an international online CHI support group. Pregnancy outcome data from autologous and surrogate pregnancies were collected. Birthweight centiles were calculated using the INTERGROWTH-21st calculator (http://intergrowth21.ndog.ox.ac.uk/en/ManualEntry). This study was approved by the London Research Ethics Committee (Fulham, 19/LO/0105). All participants provided written informed consent for publication. Thirteen women with recurrent CHI participated in the study. These women had carried 54 pregnancies themselves (51 singletons, 3 dichorionic-diamniotic twins). These pregnancies resulted in high rates of adverse perinatal outcomes (Table 1). Of the nine babies born alive, two died in the neonatal period (2/9, 22%), meaning only 7/54 pregnancies (13%) resulted in surviving children. In 8/54 (15%) pregnancies, the mother received antenatal immunosuppression including one or more of prednisolone, hydroxychloroquine, tacrolimus and intravenous immunoglobulin. Following attempts to carry a pregnancy themselves, all 13 women underwent IVF using their own oocytes and their partner's sperm, followed by embryo transfer into a surrogate mother. This led to 17 successful surrogate conceptions (12 singletons, 5 dichorionic-diamniotic twins), of which 15/17 (88%) ended in term or near-term live birth with normal birthweight. The two remaining pregnancies ended in first-trimester miscarriage, one due to fetal trisomy 21 and the other with no identified cause. There were two failed embryo transfers. None of the surrogate mothers received immunosuppression. Given the good outcomes of the completed surrogate pregnancies, only 4/17 placentas were sent for histopathological analysis and none showed signs of CHI. Before undergoing IVF and gestational surrogacy, one woman had a late miscarriage and two early miscarriages due to CHI. She then had two successful surrogate pregnancies. The first was described in the cited article by Reus et al.5 but the second has not yet been reported, hence her inclusion in this cohort. The parents of the fetus with trisomy 21 subsequently underwent further IVF using donor oocytes and had healthy dichorionic-diamniotic twins delivered at 36 weeks' gestation by a surrogate mother. ; median (IQR) This study demonstrates that when a surrogate mother carries the embryo of a couple affected by refractory CHI, pregnancy outcomes are normalised. Although surrogacy is not universally available or acceptable, it should therefore be considered as an alternative route to parenthood for these women. Changing the maternal 'host' appears to be highly effective in preventing recurrent CHI. This observation reinforces the hypothesis that CHI is driven by an abnormal maternal immune response to the placenta, as opposed to being a primary placental disorder. EFC, CAAB and DJW conceived and planned the study. TM and RT contributed to study design. EFC and CAAB collected data. EFC, TM, RT and DJW analysed the data. All authors contributed to writing and editing the article. The authors are grateful to all the participants who contributed to the study. EFC is supported by an MRC Clinical Research Training Fellowship (MR/V028731/1), which funds investigation into the pathogenesis of chronic histiocytic intervillositis. TM is supported by an MRF fellowship (MRF-057-0004-RG-MCDO-C0800). DJW is supported by the National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre. None declared. This study was approved by the London Research Ethics Committee (Fulham, 19/LO/0105) on 6 February 2019. The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Étude de cas · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,007

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,031
Tête enseignante GPT0,321
Écart entre enseignants0,290 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeÉtude de cas
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations8
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & GynaecologyMême sujetPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesTravaux en français237 207