MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367834190 · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.17522

Gestational surrogacy for women with recurrent pregnancy loss due to refractory chronic histiocytic intervillositis

2023· article· en· W4367834190 on OpenAlexaff
Emily F. Cornish, Claudia A. A. Belardo, Roger W. Turnell, Thomas McDonnell, David Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueBJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersUniversity College LondonMedical Research CouncilNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchVersus ArthritisMcDonald's Corporation
KeywordsMedicinePregnancyObstetricsLive birthMiscarriageGynecologyContext (archaeology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic histiocytic intervillositis (CHI) is a rare placental disorder that affects approximately 1 in 600 pregnancies.1 It is diagnosed when at least 5% of the intervillous space is occupied by maternal CD68+ immune cells (histiocytes) and is often accompanied by massive perivillous fibrin deposition.2 CHI is strongly associated with miscarriage (24%), stillbirth (29%), fetal growth restriction (72%) and preterm birth (68%).2 It carries a high risk of recurrence in subsequent pregnancies.1, 2 The aetiology of CHI is unclear, but its association with maternal autoimmunity and its histological similarity to rejected solid organ allografts suggest a maternal immune 'rejection' of the placenta.3 While maternal immunosuppression reduces the histological severity of CHI and can improve live birth rate,4 some patients have refractory disease in which every successive pregnancy is affected. Eventually, some of these women resort to gestational surrogacy. There is, however, only one published case of successful surrogate pregnancy in this context.5 Here, we report the outcomes of 17 surrogate pregnancies in which the embryos came from 13 women with recurrent adverse pregnancy outcomes due to CHI. Women with one or more histologically proven cases of CHI who had subsequently undergone IVF and gestational surrogacy were eligible for inclusion. Eligible women were identified through an international online CHI support group. Pregnancy outcome data from autologous and surrogate pregnancies were collected. Birthweight centiles were calculated using the INTERGROWTH-21st calculator (http://intergrowth21.ndog.ox.ac.uk/en/ManualEntry). This study was approved by the London Research Ethics Committee (Fulham, 19/LO/0105). All participants provided written informed consent for publication. Thirteen women with recurrent CHI participated in the study. These women had carried 54 pregnancies themselves (51 singletons, 3 dichorionic-diamniotic twins). These pregnancies resulted in high rates of adverse perinatal outcomes (Table 1). Of the nine babies born alive, two died in the neonatal period (2/9, 22%), meaning only 7/54 pregnancies (13%) resulted in surviving children. In 8/54 (15%) pregnancies, the mother received antenatal immunosuppression including one or more of prednisolone, hydroxychloroquine, tacrolimus and intravenous immunoglobulin. Following attempts to carry a pregnancy themselves, all 13 women underwent IVF using their own oocytes and their partner's sperm, followed by embryo transfer into a surrogate mother. This led to 17 successful surrogate conceptions (12 singletons, 5 dichorionic-diamniotic twins), of which 15/17 (88%) ended in term or near-term live birth with normal birthweight. The two remaining pregnancies ended in first-trimester miscarriage, one due to fetal trisomy 21 and the other with no identified cause. There were two failed embryo transfers. None of the surrogate mothers received immunosuppression. Given the good outcomes of the completed surrogate pregnancies, only 4/17 placentas were sent for histopathological analysis and none showed signs of CHI. Before undergoing IVF and gestational surrogacy, one woman had a late miscarriage and two early miscarriages due to CHI. She then had two successful surrogate pregnancies. The first was described in the cited article by Reus et al.5 but the second has not yet been reported, hence her inclusion in this cohort. The parents of the fetus with trisomy 21 subsequently underwent further IVF using donor oocytes and had healthy dichorionic-diamniotic twins delivered at 36 weeks' gestation by a surrogate mother. ; median (IQR) This study demonstrates that when a surrogate mother carries the embryo of a couple affected by refractory CHI, pregnancy outcomes are normalised. Although surrogacy is not universally available or acceptable, it should therefore be considered as an alternative route to parenthood for these women. Changing the maternal 'host' appears to be highly effective in preventing recurrent CHI. This observation reinforces the hypothesis that CHI is driven by an abnormal maternal immune response to the placenta, as opposed to being a primary placental disorder. EFC, CAAB and DJW conceived and planned the study. TM and RT contributed to study design. EFC and CAAB collected data. EFC, TM, RT and DJW analysed the data. All authors contributed to writing and editing the article. The authors are grateful to all the participants who contributed to the study. EFC is supported by an MRC Clinical Research Training Fellowship (MR/V028731/1), which funds investigation into the pathogenesis of chronic histiocytic intervillositis. TM is supported by an MRF fellowship (MRF-057-0004-RG-MCDO-C0800). DJW is supported by the National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre. None declared. This study was approved by the London Research Ethics Committee (Fulham, 19/LO/0105) on 6 February 2019. The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & GynaecologySame topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesFrench-language works237,207