High-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging at 7 Tesla: Single-shot readout trajectories and their impact on signal-to-noise ratio, spatial resolution and accuracy
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Diffusion MRI (dMRI) is a valuable imaging technique to study the connectivity and microstructure of the brain in vivo. However, the resolution of dMRI is limited by the low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of this technique. Various multi-shot acquisition strategies have been developed to achieve sub-millimeter resolution, but they require long scan times which can be restricting for patient scans. Alternatively, the SNR of single-shot acquisitions can be increased by using a spiral readout trajectory to minimize the sequence echo time. Imaging at ultra-high fields (UHF) could further increase the SNR of single-shot dMRI; however, the shorter T2* of brain tissue and the greater field non-uniformities at UHFs will degrade image quality, causing image blurring, distortions, and signal loss. In this study, we investigated the trade-off between the SNR and resolution of different k-space trajectories, including echo planar imaging (EPI), partial Fourier EPI, and spiral trajectories, over a range of dMRI resolutions at 7T. The effective resolution, spatial specificity and sharpening effect were measured from the point spread function (PSF) of the simulated diffusion sequences for a nominal resolution range of 0.6–1.8 mm. In-vivo partial brain scans at a nominal resolution of 1.5 mm isotropic were acquired using the three readout trajectories to validate the simulation results. Field probes were used to measure dynamic magnetic fields offline up to the 3rd order of spherical harmonics. Image reconstruction was performed using static ΔB0 field maps and the measured trajectories to correct image distortions and artifacts, leaving T2* effects as the primary source of blurring. The effective resolution was examined in fractional anisotropy (FA) maps calculated from a multi-shell dataset with b-values of 300, 1000, and 2000 s/mm2 in 5, 16, and 48 directions, respectively. In-vivo scans at nominal resolutions of 1, 1.2, and 1.5 mm were acquired and the SNR of the different trajectories calculated using the multiple replica method to investigate the SNR. Finally, in-vivo whole brain scans with an effective resolution of 1.5 mm isotropic were acquired to explore the SNR and efficiency of different trajectories at a matching effective resolution. FA and intra-cellular volume fraction (ICVF) maps calculated using neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) were used for the comparison. The simulations and in vivo imaging results showed that for matching nominal resolutions, EPI trajectories had the highest specificity and effective resolution with maximum image sharpening effect. However, spirals have a significantly higher SNR, in particular at higher resolutions and even when the effective image resolutions are matched. Overall, this work shows that the higher SNR of single-shot spiral trajectories at 7T allows us to achieve higher effective resolutions compared to EPI and PF-EPI to map the microstructure and connectivity of small brain structures.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».