High-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging at 7 Tesla: Single-shot readout trajectories and their impact on signal-to-noise ratio, spatial resolution and accuracy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diffusion MRI (dMRI) is a valuable imaging technique to study the connectivity and microstructure of the brain in vivo. However, the resolution of dMRI is limited by the low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of this technique. Various multi-shot acquisition strategies have been developed to achieve sub-millimeter resolution, but they require long scan times which can be restricting for patient scans. Alternatively, the SNR of single-shot acquisitions can be increased by using a spiral readout trajectory to minimize the sequence echo time. Imaging at ultra-high fields (UHF) could further increase the SNR of single-shot dMRI; however, the shorter T2* of brain tissue and the greater field non-uniformities at UHFs will degrade image quality, causing image blurring, distortions, and signal loss. In this study, we investigated the trade-off between the SNR and resolution of different k-space trajectories, including echo planar imaging (EPI), partial Fourier EPI, and spiral trajectories, over a range of dMRI resolutions at 7T. The effective resolution, spatial specificity and sharpening effect were measured from the point spread function (PSF) of the simulated diffusion sequences for a nominal resolution range of 0.6–1.8 mm. In-vivo partial brain scans at a nominal resolution of 1.5 mm isotropic were acquired using the three readout trajectories to validate the simulation results. Field probes were used to measure dynamic magnetic fields offline up to the 3rd order of spherical harmonics. Image reconstruction was performed using static ΔB0 field maps and the measured trajectories to correct image distortions and artifacts, leaving T2* effects as the primary source of blurring. The effective resolution was examined in fractional anisotropy (FA) maps calculated from a multi-shell dataset with b-values of 300, 1000, and 2000 s/mm2 in 5, 16, and 48 directions, respectively. In-vivo scans at nominal resolutions of 1, 1.2, and 1.5 mm were acquired and the SNR of the different trajectories calculated using the multiple replica method to investigate the SNR. Finally, in-vivo whole brain scans with an effective resolution of 1.5 mm isotropic were acquired to explore the SNR and efficiency of different trajectories at a matching effective resolution. FA and intra-cellular volume fraction (ICVF) maps calculated using neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) were used for the comparison. The simulations and in vivo imaging results showed that for matching nominal resolutions, EPI trajectories had the highest specificity and effective resolution with maximum image sharpening effect. However, spirals have a significantly higher SNR, in particular at higher resolutions and even when the effective image resolutions are matched. Overall, this work shows that the higher SNR of single-shot spiral trajectories at 7T allows us to achieve higher effective resolutions compared to EPI and PF-EPI to map the microstructure and connectivity of small brain structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".