A Comparative Enhanced Oil Recovery Study Between Low-Salinity Water and Hybrid Surfactant Process for a Carbonate Reservoir
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Over the years, water-based enhanced oil recovery (EOR) techniques have continuously been of interest for their superior technical and economic feasibility. Low-salinity water (LSW) flooding is an attractive EOR method as it can significantly improve the performance of the conventional waterflooding process all while being financially feasible at a reduced cost. Regardless of its widely acclaimed efficiency, its incapacity to substantially alter the fluid–fluid properties in the reservoir remains as one of the critical limitations of LSW flooding. The hybrid application of low-salinity water with surfactant (LSS) is a novel EOR approach with great efficiency in lowering oil-water interfacial tension (IFT) and altering the rock surface wettability. In this study, an extensive comparative analysis is held between LSW and LSS on a carbonate rock to evaluate the extent of the improvement achieved via the addition of the surfactant to the low-salinity water system. The experimental analysis between LSW and LSS is compiled based on the evaluation of fluid-fluid and rock-fluid interactions. The fluid-fluid interactions were assessed using IFT tests. The IFT between LSW and LSS solutions and crude oil was measured using the spinning drop tensiometer. The rock-fluid interactions were examined using zeta potential experiments, reservoir-condition HPHT coreflooding experiments in composite cores, and contact angle measurements in an exclusive and specifically-designed HPHT imbibition cell. The results of the IFT tests showed more effective oil-water interactions of the LSW when the surfactant was added to 1%diluted-seawater (1%dSW). IFT measurements of LSS solutions displayed significantly lower values which were substantially lower than LSW solution. The zeta potential experiments using the streaming potential method showed a clear trend of yielding more negative values for LSS solutions versus LSW at 1%dSW. The contact angle measurements confirmed a 17° difference for LSS when compared to LSW. These outcomes demonstrated that the wettability of the carbonate rock was altered from oil-wet to intermediate-wet with the addition of a low concentration of the surfactant. Coreflooding data proved conclusively that the addition of 0.2wt% of the surfactant to the LSW flooding yielded an additional 9.11% of oil recovery. The comprehensive experimental work followed in this study including contact angle and coreflooding data under HPHT conditions and zeta potentiometric studies on surface charges using whole brine-saturated cores make the findings more representative of field conditions. This paper is aimed to improve the understanding of the ability of a surfactant to improve the fluid-fluid interactions and alter the rock-fluid properties when added to LSW flooding.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle