MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4377693696 · doi:10.1353/cye.2018.0005

Access to Play for Children in Situations of Crisis Play: Rights and Practice—A Tool Kit for Staff, Managers and Policy Makers

2018· article· en· W4377693696 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mary Ann Rintoul

Notice bibliographique

RevueChildren Youth and Environments · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueChildren's Rights and Participation
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPremisePublic relationsConvention on the Rights of the ChildPolitical sciencePsychologyHuman rightsLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Review: Access to Play for Children in Situations of Crisis… 187 Access to Play for Children in Situations of Crisis Play: Rights and Practice—A Tool Kit for Staff, Managers and Policy Makers Martin King-Sheard and Marianne Mannello, Edited by Theresa Casey (2017) International Play Association: Promoting the Child’s Right to Play, 80 pages Available from http://ipaworld.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/IPA-A4-ACCESSTO -PLAY-IN-SITUATIONS-OF-CRISIS-TOOLKIT-LR.pdf The main objective of the Access to Play in Crisis (APC) tool kit is to provide a practical document for those who work with children in challenging circumstances or situations of crisis (humanitarian, natural and man-made disasters) to support children’s opportunities for play. The premise for the tool kit is based on the Child’s Right to Play (article 31 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child), which bookends the document (introduction and final page) and clearly underpins the content throughout. The tool kit has a total of 26 tools (13 for staff, nine for managers and four for policy makers). This document has the potential to be an effective tool and comprehensive guideline across cultures for adults who have a presence in the lives of children and to further understand adults’ role in supporting every child’s right to play, regardless of the circumstance. The authors outline a compelling rationale at the outset to underscore the fundamental importance of play in children’s lives with suggestions on how to use the tool kit and indicators for adults’ roles and responsibilities. This is an effective way to introduce the resource as it informs the reader immediately of the nature of the tool kit and its variety in application. After the introduction, Section 1 begins logically with information for all those working in crisis situations and then provides more specific information in sections written for staff, managers, and policy makers, respectively. Section 1 highlights play as every child’s right, its importance within the context of crisis, the optimum environments in which children should be afforded quality play experiences, specific challenges to playing, and the play rights of children with disabilities. The inclusion of the note on terminology with regards to “disabled children” (the UK social model focusing on social forces rather than individual traits) is a pertinent point to highlight. The APC tool kit is intended for an international audience, and this note is a pro-active acknowledgement that this terminology has the potential to be problematic depending on the reader’s location. For further information on the “person-first language” commonly used in North America and Australia, see Peers, Spencer-Cavaliere and Eales (2014). The authors provide an extensive Section 2 specifically for staff working with children in crisis, which could be entirely relevant for staff facilitating play in noncrisis situations as well. The authors should be commended for this informative section highlighting many valuable playwork practices empowering practitioners to do the important work of play, while supporting a child-centered focus rather than an adult-imposed agenda. The tool kit appropriately outlines much of the background needed to realize the value of play in situations of crisis as children will often process the events in their current circumstance through playing. In my work Book Review: Access to Play for Children in Situations of Crisis… 188 supervising undergraduate students during play facilitation service-learning experiences in various parts of the world, we have been witness to the tremendous healing effects of play for children in challenging situations. Even here at home in Canada at a local playday designed to facilitate opportunities for children undergoing displacement from their community ravaged by wildfires in Alberta, we saw children playing feverishly, building cardboard homes and cities, with labels such as, “my new home.” Parents stood by, supported one another and observed as their children processed the cruel reality of losing their homes and the uncertainty of never returning to their city, or life as they knew it. This APC tool kit has realworld practical advice that would have been directly relevant to the play leaders during this disaster, and thereby affirming their actions as they facilitated a meaningful and rich...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,435
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,636

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,031
Tête enseignante GPT0,336
Écart entre enseignants0,306 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueChildren Youth and EnvironmentsMême sujetChildren's Rights and ParticipationTravaux en français237 207