MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377693696 · doi:10.1353/cye.2018.0005

Access to Play for Children in Situations of Crisis Play: Rights and Practice—A Tool Kit for Staff, Managers and Policy Makers

2018· article· en· W4377693696 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mary Ann Rintoul

Bibliographic record

VenueChildren Youth and Environments · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChildren's Rights and Participation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPremisePublic relationsConvention on the Rights of the ChildPolitical sciencePsychologyHuman rightsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Review: Access to Play for Children in Situations of Crisis… 187 Access to Play for Children in Situations of Crisis Play: Rights and Practice—A Tool Kit for Staff, Managers and Policy Makers Martin King-Sheard and Marianne Mannello, Edited by Theresa Casey (2017) International Play Association: Promoting the Child’s Right to Play, 80 pages Available from http://ipaworld.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/IPA-A4-ACCESSTO -PLAY-IN-SITUATIONS-OF-CRISIS-TOOLKIT-LR.pdf The main objective of the Access to Play in Crisis (APC) tool kit is to provide a practical document for those who work with children in challenging circumstances or situations of crisis (humanitarian, natural and man-made disasters) to support children’s opportunities for play. The premise for the tool kit is based on the Child’s Right to Play (article 31 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child), which bookends the document (introduction and final page) and clearly underpins the content throughout. The tool kit has a total of 26 tools (13 for staff, nine for managers and four for policy makers). This document has the potential to be an effective tool and comprehensive guideline across cultures for adults who have a presence in the lives of children and to further understand adults’ role in supporting every child’s right to play, regardless of the circumstance. The authors outline a compelling rationale at the outset to underscore the fundamental importance of play in children’s lives with suggestions on how to use the tool kit and indicators for adults’ roles and responsibilities. This is an effective way to introduce the resource as it informs the reader immediately of the nature of the tool kit and its variety in application. After the introduction, Section 1 begins logically with information for all those working in crisis situations and then provides more specific information in sections written for staff, managers, and policy makers, respectively. Section 1 highlights play as every child’s right, its importance within the context of crisis, the optimum environments in which children should be afforded quality play experiences, specific challenges to playing, and the play rights of children with disabilities. The inclusion of the note on terminology with regards to “disabled children” (the UK social model focusing on social forces rather than individual traits) is a pertinent point to highlight. The APC tool kit is intended for an international audience, and this note is a pro-active acknowledgement that this terminology has the potential to be problematic depending on the reader’s location. For further information on the “person-first language” commonly used in North America and Australia, see Peers, Spencer-Cavaliere and Eales (2014). The authors provide an extensive Section 2 specifically for staff working with children in crisis, which could be entirely relevant for staff facilitating play in noncrisis situations as well. The authors should be commended for this informative section highlighting many valuable playwork practices empowering practitioners to do the important work of play, while supporting a child-centered focus rather than an adult-imposed agenda. The tool kit appropriately outlines much of the background needed to realize the value of play in situations of crisis as children will often process the events in their current circumstance through playing. In my work Book Review: Access to Play for Children in Situations of Crisis… 188 supervising undergraduate students during play facilitation service-learning experiences in various parts of the world, we have been witness to the tremendous healing effects of play for children in challenging situations. Even here at home in Canada at a local playday designed to facilitate opportunities for children undergoing displacement from their community ravaged by wildfires in Alberta, we saw children playing feverishly, building cardboard homes and cities, with labels such as, “my new home.” Parents stood by, supported one another and observed as their children processed the cruel reality of losing their homes and the uncertainty of never returning to their city, or life as they knew it. This APC tool kit has realworld practical advice that would have been directly relevant to the play leaders during this disaster, and thereby affirming their actions as they facilitated a meaningful and rich...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.435
Threshold uncertainty score0.636

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChildren Youth and EnvironmentsSame topicChildren's Rights and ParticipationFrench-language works237,207