MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4377941410 · doi:10.1093/jsxmed/qdad061.004

(004) Examining the Experience of Sexual Dysfunction and Spiritual Abuse among cis-Gender Muslim Women In North America

2023· article· en· W4377941410 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Syed Rahman, Abhinav Lamba, Nadiah Mohajir, Hassoum Ceesay, Y Khayr, Wajiha Z. Akhtar-Khaleel, Gershon Spitz

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journal of Sexual Medicine · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueIntimate Partner and Family Violence
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSnowball samplingPopulationMedicineSexual abusePsychiatryPsychologyDemographyClinical psychologyGerontologySuicide preventionPoison controlEnvironmental healthSociology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Unwanted sexual advances and sexual contact can lead to a lifetime of trauma. The NSVIS survey demonstrates that 43.6% of women (nearly 52.2 million) experienced some form of unwanted sexual contact sexual in their lifetime in the United States and 21.3% or an estimated 25.5 million women in the U.S. reported completed or attempted rape at some point in their lifetime (Smith et al., 2018). Additionally, prevalence rates for sexual pain for women in the U.S. vary and can be as high as 40% depending on the study. Muslim women are an underrepresented and underserved population in North America who often do not seek care for their sexual traumas and sexual difficulties. There are likely many factors involved and in order to better serve them with minimal bias, it is important for healthcare providers to understand their vast experiences in spiritual abuse and sexual dysfunction and reasons for not seeking care. Objective To understand the experiences of cis-gender Muslim women in North America with regards to sexual pain and spiritual trauma, along with looking at barriers to treatment and how to better serve this population. Methods A cross-sectional, IRB approved, online and anonymous survey was implemented in the United States and Canada for self-identified Muslim responders ages 18-45 in 2020. Survey was 151 questions that were based on validated survey instruments and implemented on Qualtrics. Snowball and purposive sampling was utilized to identify a total of 771 self-identified Muslims between the ages of 18-45. Participants were recruited via social media, listserv outreach, office visits and community partners. Demographics were assessed as well as religiosity, sexual function and dysfunction, sexual abuse and treatments. Descriptive statistics were utilized for analysis. Results The majority of respondents were heterosexual females, were part of the Sunni sect of Islam, had a bachelor’s degree or higher, and were of South Asian, Asian, Middle Eastern, or Arab ancestry. Aspects of sexual functioning such as the frequency of sexual desire, arousal during sexual intercourse, achievement of orgasm, and pain during or after vaginal penetration were assessed. Of the 158 respondents who reported having experienced sexual pain, 65.0% did not seek treatment for it. The main reasons included a sense of fear or shame, unawareness, disbelief that the situation would improve, and resolution of the pain on its own. 530 participants were asked if religion or spirituality have been used to: force them to make decisions they are opposed to (76.4%), force them to engage in a non-consensual sexual act (14.3%), isolate from others (57.9%), minimize the abuse they experienced (48.7%), or prevent them from speaking out against abuse (54.0%) Conclusions This data provides insight into a Muslim cohort’s frequency of sexual burdens which include dysfunction and abuse. Sexual abuse and sexual pain are common among cis-gender Muslim women in North America and it is underreported. Most of the patients who reported abuse and pain, did not seek treatment. Barriers to treatment may include cultural stigmas around sex, lack of cultural competence among providers, implicit bias, lack of awareness of it being a problem or there being solutions, and costs. Understanding how spiritual abuse can influence patients’ familial, romantic, and sexual relationships may help providers to administer culturally competent care to Muslim patients. Disclosure No

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,041
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,081

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,063
Tête enseignante GPT0,330
Écart entre enseignants0,267 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Journal of Sexual MedicineMême sujetIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceTravaux en français237 207