MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4377941410 · doi:10.1093/jsxmed/qdad061.004

(004) Examining the Experience of Sexual Dysfunction and Spiritual Abuse among cis-Gender Muslim Women In North America

2023· article· en· W4377941410 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Syed Rahman, Abhinav Lamba, Nadiah Mohajir, Hassoum Ceesay, Y Khayr, Wajiha Z. Akhtar-Khaleel, Gershon Spitz

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Sexual Medicine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntimate Partner and Family Violence
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnowball samplingPopulationMedicineSexual abusePsychiatryPsychologyDemographyClinical psychologyGerontologySuicide preventionPoison controlEnvironmental healthSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Unwanted sexual advances and sexual contact can lead to a lifetime of trauma. The NSVIS survey demonstrates that 43.6% of women (nearly 52.2 million) experienced some form of unwanted sexual contact sexual in their lifetime in the United States and 21.3% or an estimated 25.5 million women in the U.S. reported completed or attempted rape at some point in their lifetime (Smith et al., 2018). Additionally, prevalence rates for sexual pain for women in the U.S. vary and can be as high as 40% depending on the study. Muslim women are an underrepresented and underserved population in North America who often do not seek care for their sexual traumas and sexual difficulties. There are likely many factors involved and in order to better serve them with minimal bias, it is important for healthcare providers to understand their vast experiences in spiritual abuse and sexual dysfunction and reasons for not seeking care. Objective To understand the experiences of cis-gender Muslim women in North America with regards to sexual pain and spiritual trauma, along with looking at barriers to treatment and how to better serve this population. Methods A cross-sectional, IRB approved, online and anonymous survey was implemented in the United States and Canada for self-identified Muslim responders ages 18-45 in 2020. Survey was 151 questions that were based on validated survey instruments and implemented on Qualtrics. Snowball and purposive sampling was utilized to identify a total of 771 self-identified Muslims between the ages of 18-45. Participants were recruited via social media, listserv outreach, office visits and community partners. Demographics were assessed as well as religiosity, sexual function and dysfunction, sexual abuse and treatments. Descriptive statistics were utilized for analysis. Results The majority of respondents were heterosexual females, were part of the Sunni sect of Islam, had a bachelor’s degree or higher, and were of South Asian, Asian, Middle Eastern, or Arab ancestry. Aspects of sexual functioning such as the frequency of sexual desire, arousal during sexual intercourse, achievement of orgasm, and pain during or after vaginal penetration were assessed. Of the 158 respondents who reported having experienced sexual pain, 65.0% did not seek treatment for it. The main reasons included a sense of fear or shame, unawareness, disbelief that the situation would improve, and resolution of the pain on its own. 530 participants were asked if religion or spirituality have been used to: force them to make decisions they are opposed to (76.4%), force them to engage in a non-consensual sexual act (14.3%), isolate from others (57.9%), minimize the abuse they experienced (48.7%), or prevent them from speaking out against abuse (54.0%) Conclusions This data provides insight into a Muslim cohort’s frequency of sexual burdens which include dysfunction and abuse. Sexual abuse and sexual pain are common among cis-gender Muslim women in North America and it is underreported. Most of the patients who reported abuse and pain, did not seek treatment. Barriers to treatment may include cultural stigmas around sex, lack of cultural competence among providers, implicit bias, lack of awareness of it being a problem or there being solutions, and costs. Understanding how spiritual abuse can influence patients’ familial, romantic, and sexual relationships may help providers to administer culturally competent care to Muslim patients. Disclosure No

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Sexual Medicine→Same topicIntimate Partner and Family Violence→French-language works237,207→