MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4378473515 · doi:10.1016/j.jdin.2023.05.006

Real-world effectiveness and safety of risankizumab in patients with plaque psoriasis in whom guselkumab failed recently: A multicenter retrospective study of switching within the interleukin-23 inhibitor class

2023· article· en· W4378473515 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJAAD International · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineImmunology and Microbiology
ThématiquePsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Établissements canadiensWomen's College HospitalProbity Medical ResearchSKiN HealthDermatrials ResearchSunnybrook Health Science CentreHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineInterleukin 23PsoriasisPlaque psoriasisDermatologyMulticenter studyInterleukin 17Internal medicineRandomized controlled trialCytokine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

To the Editor: The benefit of switching between biologics is being documented by a growing body of evidence in the plaque psoriasis literature.1Piaserico S. Cazzaniga S. Chimenti S. et al.Efficacy of switching between tumor necrosis factor-alfa inhibitors in psoriasis: results from the Italian Psocare Registry.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014; 70: 257-262Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (53) Google Scholar,2Georgakopoulos J.R. Phung M. Ighani A. Yeung J. Efficacy and safety of switching to ixekizumab in secukinumab nonresponders with plaque psoriasis: a multicenter retrospective study of interleukin 17A antagonist therapies.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018; 79: 155-157Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar However, intraclass switching is a new phenomenon, and its real-world effectiveness and safety remain understudied. A pertinent gap in the literature also exists regarding long-term outcomes of switching between the 2 interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitors guselkumab and risankizumab. This study examined the effectiveness and safety of administering risankizumab to patients with plaque psoriasis who have had an inadequate response to guselkumab. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of patients aged ≥18 years with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (baseline Physician Global Assessment score of 3 or 4) who received risankizumab following an inadequate response to guselkumab. Responders were those who achieved 90% improvement in baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI90) or Physician Global Assessment scores of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). The baseline demographics and clinical outcomes are summarized in Table I. At weeks 16 and 52, 69.7% (23/33) and 75% (18/24) of patients, respectively, were considered responders. Additionally, 86.4% (19/22) and 82.4% (14/17) of patients achieved an absolute PASI of ≤2 at weeks 16 and 52, respectively. These results agree with PASI90 outcomes reported in phase 3 randomized controlled trials in which risankizumab was investigated in IL-23–naïve patients (IMMerge: 73.8% and 86.6% at weeks 16 and 52, respectively; UltIMMa-1: 75.3% and 81.9% at weeks 16 and 52, respectively; UltIMMa-2: 74.8% and 80.6% at weeks 16 and 52, respectively).3Warren R.B. Blauvelt A. Poulin Y. et al.Efficacy and safety of risankizumab vs. secukinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (IMMerge): results from a phase III, randomized, open-label, efficacy–assessor-blinded clinical trial.Br J Dermatol. 2021; 184: 50-59Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar,4Gordon K.B. Strober B. Lebwohl M. et al.Efficacy and safety of risankizumab in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (UltIMMa-1 and UltIMMa-2): results from two double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled and ustekinumab-controlled phase 3 trials.Lancet. 2018; 392: 650-661Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (350) Google ScholarTable IBaseline demographics and characteristics of patients at the risankizumab treatment initiation baseline visit and the relevant clinical outcomes after 16 and 52 weeks of treatmentVariableValueSex, n (%) Male16/33 (48.5) Female17/33 (51.5)Mean age, years ± SD54.3 ± 14.8Number of previously failed biologic therapies, mean ± SD2.39 ± 1.41Number of days treated with guselkumab ± SD284.97 ± 376.26Effectiveness Risankizumab responders, n (%)≥PASI90 or PGA 0/116 wk23/33 (69.7)52 wk18/24 (75)≥PASI75 or PGA 0/116 wk24/33 (72.7)52 wk18/24 (75)Mean PASI change16 wk5.31 ± 3.8652 wk3.18 ± 4.2PASI < 116 wk15/23 (65.2)52 wk10/19 (52.6)PASI ≤ 216 wk19/22 (86.4)52 wk14/17 (82.4)BSA < 1%16 wk14/27 (51.9)52 wk15/21 (71.4)Safety Reported adverse events, n (%)Thromboembolism1/24 (4.17)Injection-site reaction1/33 (3.03)BSA, Body surface area; PASI, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PGA, Physician Global Assessment. Open table in a new tab BSA, Body surface area; PASI, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PGA, Physician Global Assessment. Among primary guselkumab nonresponders, 60% (9/15) of patients responded to risankizumab at week 16 (Fig 1) and 46.7% (7/15) maintained their responses at week 52. Among secondary guselkumab nonresponders, 77.8% (14/18) responded at week 16 and 22.2% (4/18) maintained their response at week 52. Our findings suggest a lack of correlation between the reason for discontinuing guselkumab and the patients’ response after switching to risankizumab. This is consistent with a previous study conducted by our group that explored the effects of biologic switching between ixekizumab and secukinumab, 2 IL-17A inhibitors2Georgakopoulos J.R. Phung M. Ighani A. Yeung J. Efficacy and safety of switching to ixekizumab in secukinumab nonresponders with plaque psoriasis: a multicenter retrospective study of interleukin 17A antagonist therapies.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018; 79: 155-157Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar; however, this, in part, contradicts findings seen in previous reports of biologic switching.1Piaserico S. Cazzaniga S. Chimenti S. et al.Efficacy of switching between tumor necrosis factor-alfa inhibitors in psoriasis: results from the Italian Psocare Registry.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014; 70: 257-262Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (53) Google Scholar Adverse events (AEs) to risankizumab were uncommon, with 1 AE reported in each of the 16- and 52-week cohorts. Injection-site reaction led to discontinuation of risankizumab in 1 patient prior to 16 weeks; in another patient, a non–life-threatening venous thromboembolism developed between 16 and 52 weeks, with risankizumab being subsequently discontinued because of an unsatisfactory response. Neither of the 2 aforementioned patients reported AEs while on guselkumab. In summary, we present the largest cohort of patients with long-term follow-up, highlighting the favorable real-world effectiveness and safety of risankizumab for plaque psoriasis in guselkumab-failure patients. The results of our study support the growing body of literature regarding the promising effectiveness and safety profiles of risankizumab, with the added perspective of switching from guselkumab.5Borroni R.G. Malagoli P. Gargiulo L. et al.Real-life effectiveness and safety of risankizumab in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a 40-week multicentric retrospective study.Acta Derm Venereol. 2021; 101adv00605Crossref PubMed Google Scholar Although our clinical experience encourages dermatologists to consider the benefit of IL-23 inhibitor intraclass switching, additional prospective studies with larger sample sizes are required to postulate stronger evidence. Dr Yeung has been an advisor, consultant, speaker, and/or investigator for AbbVie, Allergan, Amgen, Arcutis, Astellas, Bausch Health, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Celgene, Centocor, Coherus, Dermavant, Dermira, Forward, Galderma, GlaxoSmithKline, Incyte, Janssen, Kyowa, Leo Pharma, Lilly, Medimmune, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi Genzyme, SunPharma, Takeda, UCB, Valeant (Bausch Health), and Xenon. Dr Prajapati has served as an investigator for AbbVie, Amgen, Arcutis, Arena, Asana, Bausch Health, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Concert, Dermavant, Dermira, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Incyte, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Nimbus Lakshmi, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Reistone, Sanofi Genzyme, UCB, and Valeant and has served as a consultant, advisor, and/or speaker for AbbVie, Actelion, Amgen, Aralez, Arcutis, Aspen, Bausch Health, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Cipher, Eli Lilly, Galderma, GlaxoSmithKline, Homeocan, Janssen, LEO Pharma, L'Oreal, Medexus, Novartis, Pediapharm, Pfizer, Sanofi Genzyme, SunPharma, Tribute, UCB, and Valeant. Dr Vender received grants/research support from Abbvie, Amgen, Bausch Health, Centocor, Dermira, Dermavant, Galderma, GSK, Leo, Lilly, Takeda, Novartis, Merck, Pfizer, Regeneron, UCB; received honoraria as a speaker for AbbVie, Amgen, Janssen, Galderma, GSK, Leo, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Bausch-Health, Actelion, Celgene, Cipher, and UCB; and was a consultant for Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Galderma, GSK, Leo, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Paladin Labs Inc., Pfizer, Bausch-Health, Actelion, Celgene, Cipher, and UCB. Drs Mufti, Maliyar, and Georgakopoulos and Authors Bagit, Rankin, Le, and Rimke have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,009
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,608

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,245
Écart entre enseignants0,237 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle