MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4378603641 · doi:10.1353/vpr.2022.0038

Julia Wedgwood, the Unexpected Victorian: The Life and Writing of a Remarkable Female Intellectual by Sue Brown

2022· article· en· W4378603641 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mercedes Sheldon

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian periodicals review · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAustralian History and Society
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiographyContext (archaeology)Art historyPopularityHistoryClassicsLawPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Julia Wedgwood, the Unexpected Victorian: The Life and Writing of a Remarkable Female Intellectual by Sue Brown Mercedes Sheldon (bio) Sue Brown, Julia Wedgwood, the Unexpected Victorian: The Life and Writing of a Remarkable Female Intellectual (London: Anthem Press, 2022), pp. viii + 384, $150/ £100 hardcover. Born into the newly prominent Wedgwood family, Julia Wedgwood (1833–1913) grew up surrounded by such nineteenth-century intellectuals as her uncle Charles Darwin, Harriet Martineau, Jane Carlyle, and Charles Kingsley, among others. After her father discouraged her burgeoning career as a novelist, Wedgwood undertook what became a financially successful career as a periodical essayist, nonfiction reviewer, and profile writer. In the mid-1880s, she also wrote reviews of contemporary fiction. Her work ignored gendered boundaries, covering philosophy, theology, natural history, and the classics. Sue Brown concludes her biography of this wide-ranging author by noting that "[Julia Wedgwood] brought to her work a rare combination of charm and authority, high intelligence and mysticism, wide but uneven reading and a seriousness she never tried to hide as well as a constant willingness to learn and explore" (307). Brown's biography seeks to revise scholarly attitudes toward Wedgwood, which have been fundamentally shaped by her death in 1913 when she had "outlived her period of greatest influence and popularity as a writer" (304). Brown's biography surveys Wedgwood's influence and popularity as they developed across her lifetime and in the context of luminaries such as F. D. Maurice, Elizabeth Gaskell, Mary and George Boole, and Richard Hutton as well as prominent debates on suffrage, women's education, vivisection, and the role of science within religion. Brown traces the complex shifts in Wedgwood's thinking about each of these through close readings of her private letters, her letters to monthly periodicals, and her essays for a range of upmarket monthlies. Brown's close reading of Wedgwood's periodical writing is of particular interest to readers of Victorian Periodicals Review. Although Brown does not undertake analysis of periodicals as either their own subject or as specific discursive spaces, she effectively situates Wedgwood within the milieu of the periodical press during the latter half of the long nineteenth century. Wedgwood published signed and unsigned articles in a variety of periodicals, including the Spectator, Contemporary Review, and Macmillan's Magazine. Brown draws on Wedgwood's correspondence to determine some of Wedgwood's article attributions. As Brown acknowledges in a footnote, "Identifying J. W.'s contributions to the Spectator is not easy now that R. H. Hutton's notebooks listing contributors in the 1870s and 1880s have been lost" (331n67). Brown notes that attribution becomes further complicated by Wedgwood's "boldness, [which has] tended to [End Page 472] conceal the place she held in the demanding world of upmarket periodical writing in the late Victorian age. Because we do not expect to find a woman writing about the variety of subjects Julia chose, we have not always seen her there" (307). Brown makes a compelling case for seeking Wedgwood's voice within the periodicals marketplace, although that case is secondary to her larger purpose of re-establishing "the scale of [Wedgwood's] achievement in both her private and public life. … She refused to conform with expectations about how Victorian spinsters should organize their lives, [giving] her the freedom to pursue her career as a writer, focusing on the big subjects that engrossed her" (306). One such subject was evolution: Wedgwood's two-part review of On the Origin of Species (1859) in Macmillan's Magazine (June 1860, July 1861) earned "generous praise from Darwin as one of the few who had fully understood his book" (81). The monograph is organized around four major phases of Wedgwood's life. Part 1 begins with microbiographies of her maternal and paternal grandfathers, her parents, and several of her Wedgwood aunts, including Emma and her uncle-by-marriage Charles Darwin. This section concludes with chapter 4, "The Young Novelist," which discusses Wedgwood's two early and only attempts at fiction: Framleigh Hall (1858), published under the pseudonym W. J., and An Old Debt (1858), published under the pseudonym Florence Dawson. As was the case for many women writers, her family disapproved...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,820
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,298
Écart entre enseignants0,270 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueVictorian periodicals reviewMême sujetAustralian History and SocietyTravaux en français237 207