MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378603641 · doi:10.1353/vpr.2022.0038

Julia Wedgwood, the Unexpected Victorian: The Life and Writing of a Remarkable Female Intellectual by Sue Brown

2022· article· en· W4378603641 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mercedes Sheldon

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian periodicals review · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAustralian History and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiographyContext (archaeology)Art historyPopularityHistoryClassicsLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Julia Wedgwood, the Unexpected Victorian: The Life and Writing of a Remarkable Female Intellectual by Sue Brown Mercedes Sheldon (bio) Sue Brown, Julia Wedgwood, the Unexpected Victorian: The Life and Writing of a Remarkable Female Intellectual (London: Anthem Press, 2022), pp. viii + 384, $150/ £100 hardcover. Born into the newly prominent Wedgwood family, Julia Wedgwood (1833–1913) grew up surrounded by such nineteenth-century intellectuals as her uncle Charles Darwin, Harriet Martineau, Jane Carlyle, and Charles Kingsley, among others. After her father discouraged her burgeoning career as a novelist, Wedgwood undertook what became a financially successful career as a periodical essayist, nonfiction reviewer, and profile writer. In the mid-1880s, she also wrote reviews of contemporary fiction. Her work ignored gendered boundaries, covering philosophy, theology, natural history, and the classics. Sue Brown concludes her biography of this wide-ranging author by noting that "[Julia Wedgwood] brought to her work a rare combination of charm and authority, high intelligence and mysticism, wide but uneven reading and a seriousness she never tried to hide as well as a constant willingness to learn and explore" (307). Brown's biography seeks to revise scholarly attitudes toward Wedgwood, which have been fundamentally shaped by her death in 1913 when she had "outlived her period of greatest influence and popularity as a writer" (304). Brown's biography surveys Wedgwood's influence and popularity as they developed across her lifetime and in the context of luminaries such as F. D. Maurice, Elizabeth Gaskell, Mary and George Boole, and Richard Hutton as well as prominent debates on suffrage, women's education, vivisection, and the role of science within religion. Brown traces the complex shifts in Wedgwood's thinking about each of these through close readings of her private letters, her letters to monthly periodicals, and her essays for a range of upmarket monthlies. Brown's close reading of Wedgwood's periodical writing is of particular interest to readers of Victorian Periodicals Review. Although Brown does not undertake analysis of periodicals as either their own subject or as specific discursive spaces, she effectively situates Wedgwood within the milieu of the periodical press during the latter half of the long nineteenth century. Wedgwood published signed and unsigned articles in a variety of periodicals, including the Spectator, Contemporary Review, and Macmillan's Magazine. Brown draws on Wedgwood's correspondence to determine some of Wedgwood's article attributions. As Brown acknowledges in a footnote, "Identifying J. W.'s contributions to the Spectator is not easy now that R. H. Hutton's notebooks listing contributors in the 1870s and 1880s have been lost" (331n67). Brown notes that attribution becomes further complicated by Wedgwood's "boldness, [which has] tended to [End Page 472] conceal the place she held in the demanding world of upmarket periodical writing in the late Victorian age. Because we do not expect to find a woman writing about the variety of subjects Julia chose, we have not always seen her there" (307). Brown makes a compelling case for seeking Wedgwood's voice within the periodicals marketplace, although that case is secondary to her larger purpose of re-establishing "the scale of [Wedgwood's] achievement in both her private and public life. … She refused to conform with expectations about how Victorian spinsters should organize their lives, [giving] her the freedom to pursue her career as a writer, focusing on the big subjects that engrossed her" (306). One such subject was evolution: Wedgwood's two-part review of On the Origin of Species (1859) in Macmillan's Magazine (June 1860, July 1861) earned "generous praise from Darwin as one of the few who had fully understood his book" (81). The monograph is organized around four major phases of Wedgwood's life. Part 1 begins with microbiographies of her maternal and paternal grandfathers, her parents, and several of her Wedgwood aunts, including Emma and her uncle-by-marriage Charles Darwin. This section concludes with chapter 4, "The Young Novelist," which discusses Wedgwood's two early and only attempts at fiction: Framleigh Hall (1858), published under the pseudonym W. J., and An Old Debt (1858), published under the pseudonym Florence Dawson. As was the case for many women writers, her family disapproved...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVictorian periodicals reviewSame topicAustralian History and SocietyFrench-language works237,207