Measurement of vitamin D sulfates in breastmilk by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Vitamin D is an essential micronutrient for infant calcium metabolism and bone development. Concentrations of vitamin D in breastmilk are low, despite higher anti-rachitic activity and correlations between infant and maternal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25D) (Taylor, et al., 2008; Oberhelman, et al., 2013). The sulfate-conjugated form of 25D is present in blood at concentrations approximately 40% of unmodified 25D. We hypothesized that sulfate conjugates, vitamin D 3 -sulfate (VitD-S) and 25-hydroxyvitamin D 3 -sulfate (25D-S), are present in milk and increase during supplementation. The objectives are (1) developing an LC-MS/MS assay to quantify VitD-S and 25D-S in milk, and (2) determine if these vitamin D sulfates increase with daily vitamin D supplementation. Methods: An LC-MS/MS method was developed to measure VitD-S and 25D-S in milk and in serum. Standards (Toronto Chemicals, Toronto, ON, CA) and internal standard (Glycomyr, Ames, IA) were used to optimize methods. Briefly, Milk (500 uL) and serum (250 uL) were extracted with methanol (MeOH) and resuspended in 150 uL 70% MeOH. Analytes were separated by C18 column with 70% to 100% MeOH with ammonium acetate (NH 4 OAc) organic phase gradient followed by MS/MS with optimized mass transitions and ESI in negative mode on SCIEX API 5000. An ongoing study is under way for breastmilk and serum collections from healthy lactating women consuming <600 IU vitamin D 3 /day at enrollment (day 1) and after 28 days of oral 5000 IU vitamin D 3 /day (day 28). This study was approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board. Results: Preliminary analyses have been completed for 3 study participants. Serum 25D status had a trending increase from 30±2 ng/mL 25D on day 1 to 40±2 ng/mL 25D on day 28 ( P=0.1, paired t-test). Limit of detection [signal to noise (s/n) >3] for sulfates were 0.5 ng/mL 25D-S (s/n=7.3) and 0.25 ng/mL VitD-S (s/n=6.2). Upon enrollment, breastmilk sulfates were 3.25±0.12 ng/mL VitD-S (s/n=83.7±20.6) and 0.18±0.02 ng/mL 25D-S (s/n=13.6±3.3), and serum sulfates were 7.5±0.8 ng/mL VitD-S (s/n=39.4±22.5) and 53.2±10.4 ng/mL 25D-S (s/n=22.5±7.2). No statistical differences were observed between day 1 and day 28 in milk or serum sulfates for the 3 participants. However, VitD-S concentrations demonstrated a significant negative correlation between serum and milk ( r=0.87, P=0.03), and serum 25D-S was 21.3 ng/mL greater than unmodified serum 25D ( P=0.009, n=6). This study is ongoing, and data presented will include a greater number of study participants. Conclusions: We have developed an LC-MS/MS assay to measure VitD-S and 25D-S and found that VitD-S and 25D-S are present in freshly expressed breastmilk and in serum from women consuming <600 IU vitamin D 3 /day. F32 DK128987 & The Mayo Clinic Parker D. Sanders & Isabella G. Sanders Endowed Professorship. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2023 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».