MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Measurement of vitamin D sulfates in breastmilk by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry

2023· article· en· W4378674886 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carmen J. Reynolds, Roy B. Dyer, Sara S. Oberhelman, Brianna Konwinski, Ravinder J. Singh

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBreastfeeding Practices and Influences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVitamin D and neurologyChemistryBreast milkVitaminvitamin D deficiencyChromatographyMicronutrientInternal medicineEndocrinologyFood scienceBiochemistryMedicineOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Vitamin D is an essential micronutrient for infant calcium metabolism and bone development. Concentrations of vitamin D in breastmilk are low, despite higher anti-rachitic activity and correlations between infant and maternal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25D) (Taylor, et al., 2008; Oberhelman, et al., 2013). The sulfate-conjugated form of 25D is present in blood at concentrations approximately 40% of unmodified 25D. We hypothesized that sulfate conjugates, vitamin D 3 -sulfate (VitD-S) and 25-hydroxyvitamin D 3 -sulfate (25D-S), are present in milk and increase during supplementation. The objectives are (1) developing an LC-MS/MS assay to quantify VitD-S and 25D-S in milk, and (2) determine if these vitamin D sulfates increase with daily vitamin D supplementation. Methods: An LC-MS/MS method was developed to measure VitD-S and 25D-S in milk and in serum. Standards (Toronto Chemicals, Toronto, ON, CA) and internal standard (Glycomyr, Ames, IA) were used to optimize methods. Briefly, Milk (500 uL) and serum (250 uL) were extracted with methanol (MeOH) and resuspended in 150 uL 70% MeOH. Analytes were separated by C18 column with 70% to 100% MeOH with ammonium acetate (NH 4 OAc) organic phase gradient followed by MS/MS with optimized mass transitions and ESI in negative mode on SCIEX API 5000. An ongoing study is under way for breastmilk and serum collections from healthy lactating women consuming <600 IU vitamin D 3 /day at enrollment (day 1) and after 28 days of oral 5000 IU vitamin D 3 /day (day 28). This study was approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board. Results: Preliminary analyses have been completed for 3 study participants. Serum 25D status had a trending increase from 30±2 ng/mL 25D on day 1 to 40±2 ng/mL 25D on day 28 ( P=0.1, paired t-test). Limit of detection [signal to noise (s/n) >3] for sulfates were 0.5 ng/mL 25D-S (s/n=7.3) and 0.25 ng/mL VitD-S (s/n=6.2). Upon enrollment, breastmilk sulfates were 3.25±0.12 ng/mL VitD-S (s/n=83.7±20.6) and 0.18±0.02 ng/mL 25D-S (s/n=13.6±3.3), and serum sulfates were 7.5±0.8 ng/mL VitD-S (s/n=39.4±22.5) and 53.2±10.4 ng/mL 25D-S (s/n=22.5±7.2). No statistical differences were observed between day 1 and day 28 in milk or serum sulfates for the 3 participants. However, VitD-S concentrations demonstrated a significant negative correlation between serum and milk ( r=0.87, P=0.03), and serum 25D-S was 21.3 ng/mL greater than unmodified serum 25D ( P=0.009, n=6). This study is ongoing, and data presented will include a greater number of study participants. Conclusions: We have developed an LC-MS/MS assay to measure VitD-S and 25D-S and found that VitD-S and 25D-S are present in freshly expressed breastmilk and in serum from women consuming <600 IU vitamin D 3 /day. F32 DK128987 & The Mayo Clinic Parker D. Sanders & Isabella G. Sanders Endowed Professorship. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2023 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.871
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologySame topicBreastfeeding Practices and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207