Biochemical recurrence (BCR) among patients (pts) with prostate cancer (PC) after radiation therapy (RT).
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
e17111 Background: RT is a frequent primary treatment for pts with clinically localized PC. Despite its frequent success, 30-50% of pts eventually present with BCR, defined as rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA). BCR is associated with a higher risk of developing distant metastasis and ultimately death from PC. Understanding BCR occurrence and its impact on clinical outcomes is important for optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for recurrent disease. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study using nationally representative Electronic Medical Records (EMR) data from Optum© from 1/2010-9/2021. Eligible pts were adults who underwent RT after PC diagnosis, had ≥ 3 available PSA values after initiating RT, and had EMR activity for at least 6 mo before and 12 mo after RT. Pts with a history of prior malignancy except nonmelanoma skin cancers and pts with metastatic PC (mPC) at baseline (BL) or within 3 months after RT were excluded. The BL period was 6 mo before RT initiation. Primary outcome was frequency of BCR, defined as rising PSA (PSA ≥ nadir + 2 ng/mL); secondary analyses included % of pts who progressed to mPC, castration-resistant PC (CRPC), and death after BCR and factors impacting time to BCR. Results: 9,292 RT pts were included in this analysis. Key pt characteristics/outcomes are shown in the Table. Median (range) age was 69.0 (40-88) y, 83.2% of pts were White, and 13.4% were Black. Median PSA nadir was 0.11 ng/mL, 32.5% of pts had received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) during BL period, and median (Q1-Q3) follow-up from RT initiation was 3.8 (2.4-5.7) y. Overall, 10.2% of pts developed BCR. Among BCR pts (n = 949), 51.2% had a PSA doubling time (PSADT) < 6 mo and 16.9% had a PSADT between 6-10 mo; 35.0% developed mPC, 30.2% developed CRPC, and 23.4% died. In multivariate Cox regression models, the BL factor associated with the highest risk of developing BCR was PSA ≥ 20 ng/mL. Conversely, the risk of developing BCR was lower for pts who received ADT during BL. Conclusions: This real-world (RW) study evaluates BCR occurrence in pts who underwent RT with a curative intent from a large US database. The study confirms BL PSA as an important prognostic marker for BCR, while use of ADT before RT is associated with a lower risk of BCR. A considerable % of pts with BCR developed mPC (35%) or died (23%) during the study period. Novel treatment strategies are needed to delay BCR and further progression to advanced PC in pts with high-risk localized disease. [Table: see text]
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».