MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379417038 · doi:10.1353/uni.2010.a404272

Alice Beyond Wonderland: Essays for the Twenty-First Century (review)

2010· article· en· W4379417038 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zoë Jaques

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œLion and the unicorn · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueThemes in Literature Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAdventureAlice (programming language)MythologyArt historyHistoryEnthusiasmSociologyClassicsPsychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Alice Beyond Wonderland: Essays for the Twenty-First Century Zoe Jaques (bio) Hollingsworth, Cristopher , ed. Alice Beyond Wonderland: Essays for the Twenty-First Century. Iowa City: Iowa UP, 2009. Anyone who teaches Alice's Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass will be familiar with students asking, often within the first ten minutes of a seminar, some variation on that enduring question: "Was Dodgson dodgy?" As a result, most tutors find themselves embroiled in discussions about the validity of exploring the text in the light of Charles Lutwidge Dodgson's notorious interest in young girls. In these instances, instructors do well to call upon Karoline Leach's observation that "beyond the familiar story of 'little girls,' primness, virginity and reclusive weirdness, [Dodgson's] documented life seems rich, adult, replete with evidence of broad-mindedness, ambiguity and tolerance" (15). Nevertheless, escaping from the pervasive Carroll myth has long been difficult for scholars and students of Alice, not least because of the apparent dualities of Carroll and Dodgson himself. As Cristopher Hollingsworth notes in his introduction, it is appropriate that Leach offers a preface to Alice Beyond Wonderland: Essays for the Twenty-First Century. Just as Leach sought to challenge traditional views about Carroll, this volume explores what Hollingsworth terms "the Wonderland complex." As he rightly observes, "Whatever was 'in' Carroll's books has been free and busy in the wider world for some time" (xix), and thus the task becomes not to measure Carroll's predilections but to explore the large and abstract cultural system "organized around the 'story space' of Wonderland" (xix). The project of the volume is therefore an ambitious one. The editor recognizes the facts that the Alice books are "ontologically variegated" (xxi) and defy "a singular unifying perspective" (xxii), and that the approach to them must be "bold, inclusive, and experimental" (xxii). The collection is thus divided into three sections on Literature, Image, and Culture—divisions that are not especially bold or experimental, but which seek to examine Carroll's fiction with fresh eyes. The essays are all gathered (in some cases rather loosely) around the topic of space, perhaps anticipating (although not mentioning) Gillian Beer's own Wonderland study, Alice in Space (U of Chicago P, forthcoming). Hollingsworth suggests that the collection is organized "to accord with the opening arc of Alice's Adventures, a defining movement from the mundane to the wonderful that is known to nearly everyone" (xxii). The worrisome implication here is that the first section of the book might accord with the implied mundane start to Alice's journey. Thankfully, Hollingsworth tempers [End Page 364] his statement, suggesting that "[t]hough my 'path to Wonderland' treats narrative literature as old-fashioned, the five texts gathered under this rubric are anything but" (xxiii). Indeed, the Literature section tackles topics ranging from hyperspace philosophy in the Alice books to reading Alice's Adventures and Looking-Glass from the perspective of old age rather than youth. In the opening essay, "Underworld Portmanteaux: Dante's Hell and Carroll's Wonderland in Women's Memoirs of Mental Illness," Rachel Falconer explores how Carroll's Wonderland space is "portmanteau-ed" (using Humpty Dumpty's expression) with the imagery of Dante's Hell in contemporary women's autobiographies. Falconer suggests that the effect of yoking together the underworlds of Carroll and Dante is "to produce a complex underworld space that is at once authorizing and radicalizing, punishing and (potentially) ludic" (3). The essay principally explores these issues in Marya Hornbacher's Wasted: A Memoir of Anorexia and Bulimia (1998), a text written by a then twenty-three-year-old about her remarkable girlhood, but also draws upon a wider range of autobiographical and semi-fictional memoirs. For Falconer, the hybridization of austere Dantean allusion with the playful child-centered Alice creates a type of écriture feminine in which young women might locate meaning, learn survival, and reflect on their experiences of the metaphorical underworld of mental illness. As in most critical collections, there is some fluctuation in the relevance of the essays, and the second contribution by Christine Roth, "Looking Through the Spyglass: Lewis Carroll, James Barrie, and the Empire of Childhood," offers a somewhat less...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,917
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,223
Écart entre enseignants0,213 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue˜The œLion and the unicornMême sujetThemes in Literature AnalysisTravaux en français237 207