MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379417038 · doi:10.1353/uni.2010.a404272

Alice Beyond Wonderland: Essays for the Twenty-First Century (review)

2010· article· en· W4379417038 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zoë Jaques

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œLion and the unicorn · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicThemes in Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdventureAlice (programming language)MythologyArt historyHistoryEnthusiasmSociologyClassicsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Alice Beyond Wonderland: Essays for the Twenty-First Century Zoe Jaques (bio) Hollingsworth, Cristopher , ed. Alice Beyond Wonderland: Essays for the Twenty-First Century. Iowa City: Iowa UP, 2009. Anyone who teaches Alice's Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass will be familiar with students asking, often within the first ten minutes of a seminar, some variation on that enduring question: "Was Dodgson dodgy?" As a result, most tutors find themselves embroiled in discussions about the validity of exploring the text in the light of Charles Lutwidge Dodgson's notorious interest in young girls. In these instances, instructors do well to call upon Karoline Leach's observation that "beyond the familiar story of 'little girls,' primness, virginity and reclusive weirdness, [Dodgson's] documented life seems rich, adult, replete with evidence of broad-mindedness, ambiguity and tolerance" (15). Nevertheless, escaping from the pervasive Carroll myth has long been difficult for scholars and students of Alice, not least because of the apparent dualities of Carroll and Dodgson himself. As Cristopher Hollingsworth notes in his introduction, it is appropriate that Leach offers a preface to Alice Beyond Wonderland: Essays for the Twenty-First Century. Just as Leach sought to challenge traditional views about Carroll, this volume explores what Hollingsworth terms "the Wonderland complex." As he rightly observes, "Whatever was 'in' Carroll's books has been free and busy in the wider world for some time" (xix), and thus the task becomes not to measure Carroll's predilections but to explore the large and abstract cultural system "organized around the 'story space' of Wonderland" (xix). The project of the volume is therefore an ambitious one. The editor recognizes the facts that the Alice books are "ontologically variegated" (xxi) and defy "a singular unifying perspective" (xxii), and that the approach to them must be "bold, inclusive, and experimental" (xxii). The collection is thus divided into three sections on Literature, Image, and Culture—divisions that are not especially bold or experimental, but which seek to examine Carroll's fiction with fresh eyes. The essays are all gathered (in some cases rather loosely) around the topic of space, perhaps anticipating (although not mentioning) Gillian Beer's own Wonderland study, Alice in Space (U of Chicago P, forthcoming). Hollingsworth suggests that the collection is organized "to accord with the opening arc of Alice's Adventures, a defining movement from the mundane to the wonderful that is known to nearly everyone" (xxii). The worrisome implication here is that the first section of the book might accord with the implied mundane start to Alice's journey. Thankfully, Hollingsworth tempers [End Page 364] his statement, suggesting that "[t]hough my 'path to Wonderland' treats narrative literature as old-fashioned, the five texts gathered under this rubric are anything but" (xxiii). Indeed, the Literature section tackles topics ranging from hyperspace philosophy in the Alice books to reading Alice's Adventures and Looking-Glass from the perspective of old age rather than youth. In the opening essay, "Underworld Portmanteaux: Dante's Hell and Carroll's Wonderland in Women's Memoirs of Mental Illness," Rachel Falconer explores how Carroll's Wonderland space is "portmanteau-ed" (using Humpty Dumpty's expression) with the imagery of Dante's Hell in contemporary women's autobiographies. Falconer suggests that the effect of yoking together the underworlds of Carroll and Dante is "to produce a complex underworld space that is at once authorizing and radicalizing, punishing and (potentially) ludic" (3). The essay principally explores these issues in Marya Hornbacher's Wasted: A Memoir of Anorexia and Bulimia (1998), a text written by a then twenty-three-year-old about her remarkable girlhood, but also draws upon a wider range of autobiographical and semi-fictional memoirs. For Falconer, the hybridization of austere Dantean allusion with the playful child-centered Alice creates a type of écriture feminine in which young women might locate meaning, learn survival, and reflect on their experiences of the metaphorical underworld of mental illness. As in most critical collections, there is some fluctuation in the relevance of the essays, and the second contribution by Christine Roth, "Looking Through the Spyglass: Lewis Carroll, James Barrie, and the Empire of Childhood," offers a somewhat less...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.917
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œLion and the unicornSame topicThemes in Literature AnalysisFrench-language works237,207