MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379421883 · doi:10.1353/see.2002.0247

Joseph Brodsky and the Soviet Muse by David s> MacFadyen (review)

2002· article· en· W4379421883 sur OpenAlex
George S. Smith

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Slavonic and East European Review · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueVladimir Nabokov Literary Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFyodorCharacter (mathematics)Ideal (ethics)PhilosophyQueen (butterfly)RomanceLiteratureNothingArtReading (process)Art historyParagraphLawEpistemologyPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

I24 SEER, 8o, I, 2002 on readerreception also yield valuable insightsinto the workingsof the novel and Nabokov's aesthetics, with the familiar Nabokovian stance of total authorialcontrolset againstthe notion of the empowered reader. It isBlackwell'smain thesis,the allimportanceof Zina and her contribution to the novel we are reading, that remainsshadowy. The lengthy introduction of the character and build-up to the final manifestation leads to nothing tangible,with attention deflectedin the penultimate chapterto a discourseon Platonic and Romantic love. Such criticismmay sound damning. It isn't. For Blackwell's whole point is that Zina is intentionally merely a shadowy presence. The female editorial hand is not even as visible as Ada's in Nabokov's later development of this compositional idea. Zina's inner world remainslargelya secretto Fyodor, since love (Dolinin's suggestionthis,which regrettablyBlackwelltucksinto a footnote, n. 50, p. I93) preservesa person's inner mystery and renders him/her opaque, not transparent.Zina's importance , and the importance and integrity of Blackwell'sreading, is the empty spaceshecreates,beyond thelineofthepage, forotherreaders'understanding. The privileging of Zina as ideal reader is, as he states in his concluding paragraph,the 'figure'spowerasan imageoftransitionto higherconsciousness generally,to a lesslimited stateof existence' (p. i68). School ofSlavonic andEastEuropean Studies JANE GRAYSON University College London MacFadyen, David. Joseph Brodskyand the SovietMuse. McGill-Queen's UniversityPress,Montreal, Kingston, London and Ithaca, 2000. 209 pp. Notes. Bibliography.Index. ?35.50. A pendant to David MacFadyen's JosephBrodskyand the Baroque,which appeared from the same press in i999, this book also deals with the initial stage of Brodsky's writing, that is, up to his arrest and internal exile in I963-64. The author has had access to the Brodskyarchive in the National Library,St Petersburg,and also conducted interviewswith some of the friends of Brodsky'syouth. In his eight short chapters he addresses an enormous number of topics and authors, all of them familiar points of reference in existing statements about and studies of the cultural circumstances of Brodsky's intellectual and creative formation:jazz, Anglo-American prose fiction, Frost, Slutsky,Bagritsky,Galczyfiski,poetry for children, Pasternak, Tsvetaeva, Byron, and finally Derzhavin. The only substantialexception to the familiarlitany is a passage (pp. I76-8I) concerning two poems: 'Traktory na rassvete', which Brodskypublished in the local newspaper in exile, and 'Narod', which he evidently thought would serve as the 'locomotive' that would pull his proposed collection of I965 past the Soviet gatekeepers and into print. Otherwise, notwithstandingthe coy referencesto privileged sources, there is nothing that takes our understandingof these topics substantiallybeyond what has already been said by others. In particular, to judge from the fragmentsthat are cited here, the contemporariesof Brodskyinterviewedby MacFadyen have added very little to what they have already said to other REVIEWS I25 interlocutorsand/or publishedin theirvariouswritingsabout the poet -and all this in addition to the poet's own copious dicta. Even worse, MacFadyen appears to have swallowed these contemporaries' frequently asserted but unsustainable conviction that their generation of Russians was better read than any other, and he parrotsyet again their provincial legends about their expert knowledgeofjazz and other forbiddenfruit.As for scholars,theirwork is as a rule simply ignored or not acknowledged. To takejust one example: MacFadyen abruptlyassertsthat 'Xolmy has also been assessedin terms of its debtto the balladicgenre'(p. 158).Bywhom, when, andwhere, isone entitled to ask?Nothing is discussedhere with the penetration and detail it deserves. Instead,the successivetopics areperemptorilyidentified,superficiallyassessed with the aid of elementary secondary sources that do duty for authentic knowledgeof the originalmaterial,and straitjacketedinto conceptual schemes that are never properlyestablished.The most egregious example of the latter is 'the Soviet Muse'. This phrase appearsin the book's title and is picked up and dropped at severalpoints in the course of the text; the readeris given no real idea about what it is meant to mean, beyond something vague about masculinity that the author apparently thinks will take on substance if he repeatsit often enough. The text of this book reads throughout like a first draft produced by an enthusiastic but ill-trained graduate student full of mistranslations, ungrounded assertions, arbitrary associations, premature generalizations, invertedlogic, and awkwardlypretentiousformulations.There are occasional descentsinto simplenonsense, such as the sentence 'Pasternak,having spoken...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,268
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,782

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,256
Écart entre enseignants0,231 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle