MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379421883 · doi:10.1353/see.2002.0247

Joseph Brodsky and the Soviet Muse by David s> MacFadyen (review)

2002· article· en· W4379421883 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
George S. Smith

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Slavonic and East European Review · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueVladimir Nabokov Literary Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFyodorCharacter (mathematics)Ideal (ethics)PhilosophyQueen (butterfly)RomanceLiteratureNothingArtReading (process)Art historyParagraphLawEpistemologyPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

I24 SEER, 8o, I, 2002 on readerreception also yield valuable insightsinto the workingsof the novel and Nabokov's aesthetics, with the familiar Nabokovian stance of total authorialcontrolset againstthe notion of the empowered reader. It isBlackwell'smain thesis,the allimportanceof Zina and her contribution to the novel we are reading, that remainsshadowy. The lengthy introduction of the character and build-up to the final manifestation leads to nothing tangible,with attention deflectedin the penultimate chapterto a discourseon Platonic and Romantic love. Such criticismmay sound damning. It isn't. For Blackwell's whole point is that Zina is intentionally merely a shadowy presence. The female editorial hand is not even as visible as Ada's in Nabokov's later development of this compositional idea. Zina's inner world remainslargelya secretto Fyodor, since love (Dolinin's suggestionthis,which regrettablyBlackwelltucksinto a footnote, n. 50, p. I93) preservesa person's inner mystery and renders him/her opaque, not transparent.Zina's importance , and the importance and integrity of Blackwell'sreading, is the empty spaceshecreates,beyond thelineofthepage, forotherreaders'understanding. The privileging of Zina as ideal reader is, as he states in his concluding paragraph,the 'figure'spowerasan imageoftransitionto higherconsciousness generally,to a lesslimited stateof existence' (p. i68). School ofSlavonic andEastEuropean Studies JANE GRAYSON University College London MacFadyen, David. Joseph Brodskyand the SovietMuse. McGill-Queen's UniversityPress,Montreal, Kingston, London and Ithaca, 2000. 209 pp. Notes. Bibliography.Index. ?35.50. A pendant to David MacFadyen's JosephBrodskyand the Baroque,which appeared from the same press in i999, this book also deals with the initial stage of Brodsky's writing, that is, up to his arrest and internal exile in I963-64. The author has had access to the Brodskyarchive in the National Library,St Petersburg,and also conducted interviewswith some of the friends of Brodsky'syouth. In his eight short chapters he addresses an enormous number of topics and authors, all of them familiar points of reference in existing statements about and studies of the cultural circumstances of Brodsky's intellectual and creative formation:jazz, Anglo-American prose fiction, Frost, Slutsky,Bagritsky,Galczyfiski,poetry for children, Pasternak, Tsvetaeva, Byron, and finally Derzhavin. The only substantialexception to the familiarlitany is a passage (pp. I76-8I) concerning two poems: 'Traktory na rassvete', which Brodskypublished in the local newspaper in exile, and 'Narod', which he evidently thought would serve as the 'locomotive' that would pull his proposed collection of I965 past the Soviet gatekeepers and into print. Otherwise, notwithstandingthe coy referencesto privileged sources, there is nothing that takes our understandingof these topics substantiallybeyond what has already been said by others. In particular, to judge from the fragmentsthat are cited here, the contemporariesof Brodskyinterviewedby MacFadyen have added very little to what they have already said to other REVIEWS I25 interlocutorsand/or publishedin theirvariouswritingsabout the poet -and all this in addition to the poet's own copious dicta. Even worse, MacFadyen appears to have swallowed these contemporaries' frequently asserted but unsustainable conviction that their generation of Russians was better read than any other, and he parrotsyet again their provincial legends about their expert knowledgeofjazz and other forbiddenfruit.As for scholars,theirwork is as a rule simply ignored or not acknowledged. To takejust one example: MacFadyen abruptlyassertsthat 'Xolmy has also been assessedin terms of its debtto the balladicgenre'(p. 158).Bywhom, when, andwhere, isone entitled to ask?Nothing is discussedhere with the penetration and detail it deserves. Instead,the successivetopics areperemptorilyidentified,superficiallyassessed with the aid of elementary secondary sources that do duty for authentic knowledgeof the originalmaterial,and straitjacketedinto conceptual schemes that are never properlyestablished.The most egregious example of the latter is 'the Soviet Muse'. This phrase appearsin the book's title and is picked up and dropped at severalpoints in the course of the text; the readeris given no real idea about what it is meant to mean, beyond something vague about masculinity that the author apparently thinks will take on substance if he repeatsit often enough. The text of this book reads throughout like a first draft produced by an enthusiastic but ill-trained graduate student full of mistranslations, ungrounded assertions, arbitrary associations, premature generalizations, invertedlogic, and awkwardlypretentiousformulations.There are occasional descentsinto simplenonsense, such as the sentence 'Pasternak,having spoken...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,021
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,069

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0040,004
Science ouverte0,0020,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0210,007

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,256
Écart entre enseignants0,231 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2002
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Slavonic and East European ReviewMême sujetVladimir Nabokov Literary StudiesTravaux en français237 207