MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379421883 · doi:10.1353/see.2002.0247

Joseph Brodsky and the Soviet Muse by David s> MacFadyen (review)

2002· article· en· W4379421883 on OpenAlex
George S. Smith

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Slavonic and East European Review · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicVladimir Nabokov Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFyodorCharacter (mathematics)Ideal (ethics)PhilosophyQueen (butterfly)RomanceLiteratureNothingArtReading (process)Art historyParagraphLawEpistemologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I24 SEER, 8o, I, 2002 on readerreception also yield valuable insightsinto the workingsof the novel and Nabokov's aesthetics, with the familiar Nabokovian stance of total authorialcontrolset againstthe notion of the empowered reader. It isBlackwell'smain thesis,the allimportanceof Zina and her contribution to the novel we are reading, that remainsshadowy. The lengthy introduction of the character and build-up to the final manifestation leads to nothing tangible,with attention deflectedin the penultimate chapterto a discourseon Platonic and Romantic love. Such criticismmay sound damning. It isn't. For Blackwell's whole point is that Zina is intentionally merely a shadowy presence. The female editorial hand is not even as visible as Ada's in Nabokov's later development of this compositional idea. Zina's inner world remainslargelya secretto Fyodor, since love (Dolinin's suggestionthis,which regrettablyBlackwelltucksinto a footnote, n. 50, p. I93) preservesa person's inner mystery and renders him/her opaque, not transparent.Zina's importance , and the importance and integrity of Blackwell'sreading, is the empty spaceshecreates,beyond thelineofthepage, forotherreaders'understanding. The privileging of Zina as ideal reader is, as he states in his concluding paragraph,the 'figure'spowerasan imageoftransitionto higherconsciousness generally,to a lesslimited stateof existence' (p. i68). School ofSlavonic andEastEuropean Studies JANE GRAYSON University College London MacFadyen, David. Joseph Brodskyand the SovietMuse. McGill-Queen's UniversityPress,Montreal, Kingston, London and Ithaca, 2000. 209 pp. Notes. Bibliography.Index. ?35.50. A pendant to David MacFadyen's JosephBrodskyand the Baroque,which appeared from the same press in i999, this book also deals with the initial stage of Brodsky's writing, that is, up to his arrest and internal exile in I963-64. The author has had access to the Brodskyarchive in the National Library,St Petersburg,and also conducted interviewswith some of the friends of Brodsky'syouth. In his eight short chapters he addresses an enormous number of topics and authors, all of them familiar points of reference in existing statements about and studies of the cultural circumstances of Brodsky's intellectual and creative formation:jazz, Anglo-American prose fiction, Frost, Slutsky,Bagritsky,Galczyfiski,poetry for children, Pasternak, Tsvetaeva, Byron, and finally Derzhavin. The only substantialexception to the familiarlitany is a passage (pp. I76-8I) concerning two poems: 'Traktory na rassvete', which Brodskypublished in the local newspaper in exile, and 'Narod', which he evidently thought would serve as the 'locomotive' that would pull his proposed collection of I965 past the Soviet gatekeepers and into print. Otherwise, notwithstandingthe coy referencesto privileged sources, there is nothing that takes our understandingof these topics substantiallybeyond what has already been said by others. In particular, to judge from the fragmentsthat are cited here, the contemporariesof Brodskyinterviewedby MacFadyen have added very little to what they have already said to other REVIEWS I25 interlocutorsand/or publishedin theirvariouswritingsabout the poet -and all this in addition to the poet's own copious dicta. Even worse, MacFadyen appears to have swallowed these contemporaries' frequently asserted but unsustainable conviction that their generation of Russians was better read than any other, and he parrotsyet again their provincial legends about their expert knowledgeofjazz and other forbiddenfruit.As for scholars,theirwork is as a rule simply ignored or not acknowledged. To takejust one example: MacFadyen abruptlyassertsthat 'Xolmy has also been assessedin terms of its debtto the balladicgenre'(p. 158).Bywhom, when, andwhere, isone entitled to ask?Nothing is discussedhere with the penetration and detail it deserves. Instead,the successivetopics areperemptorilyidentified,superficiallyassessed with the aid of elementary secondary sources that do duty for authentic knowledgeof the originalmaterial,and straitjacketedinto conceptual schemes that are never properlyestablished.The most egregious example of the latter is 'the Soviet Muse'. This phrase appearsin the book's title and is picked up and dropped at severalpoints in the course of the text; the readeris given no real idea about what it is meant to mean, beyond something vague about masculinity that the author apparently thinks will take on substance if he repeatsit often enough. The text of this book reads throughout like a first draft produced by an enthusiastic but ill-trained graduate student full of mistranslations, ungrounded assertions, arbitrary associations, premature generalizations, invertedlogic, and awkwardlypretentiousformulations.There are occasional descentsinto simplenonsense, such as the sentence 'Pasternak,having spoken...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.268
Threshold uncertainty score0.782

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it