MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379425087 · doi:10.1353/see.2016.0005

�slund, Anders Ukraine: What Went Wrong and How to Fix It (review)

2016· article· en· W4379425087 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
A. S. Wilson

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Slavonic and East European Review · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueRussia and Soviet political economy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésUkrainianPoliticsDemocracyQuarter (Canadian coin)OligarchyPolitical scienceLawSociologyEconomic historyHistoryPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

SEER, 94, 4, October 2016 784 every reading list on contemporary Ukraine, but while it delivers a lot of what everyone needs to know, it does not provide everything. School of Politics and International Relations Richard Sakwa University of Kent Åslund, Anders. Ukraine: What Went Wrong and How to Fix It. Peterson Institute for International Economics, Washington, D.C., 2015. xix + 273 pp. Map. Figures. Tables. Notes. Bibliography. Chronology. Index. $25.95:£24.50 (paperback). Anders Åslund is widely acknowledged as one of the world’s leading experts on the Ukrainian economy. This is a timely book for many reasons. It is important to know why the Yanukovych regime was so self-destructive economically. It is even more vital to disentangle the effects of the war in east Ukraine and the Russian trade war since 2013 from the long-term problems of the local economy in explaining the economic collapse of 2013–15. And it is most important to look at the underlying reasons for a quarter of a century of economic under-performance, and how that can be changed. There is an issue with compatibility with Åslund’s earlier works, particularly his How Ukraine Became a Market Economy and Democracy from 2009. Part of the story is of course regression under Yanukovych, who was elected in February 2010; but the book currently under review doesn’t really refer to the earlier volume. The new book makes claims like Ukraine built ‘a rent-seeking oligarchy that was never effectively challenged during Ukraine’s 23 years of independence from the Soviet Union’ before 2014 (p. 4); which may indeed be true, but Åslund does not revisit earlier arguments from 2009, such as Ukraine’s then ‘competitive oligarchy bred high growth and pluralism’ (How Ukraine…, p. 6) — at least before the rise of the Yanukovych ‘Family’. Time will tell whether some of the key judgements of this latest book are also premature: ‘this time is different in Ukraine’, ‘the power of the oligarchs has declined’, and ‘the threat of populism is also on the wane’ (pp. 22–32). One or two individual judgements may also raise eyebrows; such as the claim that Yuliya Tymoshenko as Prime Minister had no chance of making ‘any of the badly needed structural reforms’ in 2009, ‘in the face of united opposition from Yanukovych and Yushchenko’ (p. 75). If she had been bolder in partnership with the IMF, then the 2010 election might have been very different. But the heart of the book is its analysis of Ukraine’s rentier oligarchy, its corruption and its influence on bad policy-making. Åslund’s solutions are radical, but few would dispute the need for a decisive break with the REVIEWS 785 dysfunctional equilibrium of partial reform that has entrenched itself over the years. At the time of writing, February 2016, the new authorities were beset by scandals that demonstrated the power of the vicious circles and protective mechanisms that defended the old sistema. But drifting back into the old ways will be much more consequent than it was after the Orange Revolution in 2004. Whether Ukraine can win its (conventional) war against Russia’s ‘hybrid war’ in the east depends on whether it can win on the home front too. Åslund’s final warning is stark: ‘The new Ukrainian government is facing a tall order. No reformer has succeeded in doing everything, but this government needs to accomplish a great deal if Ukraine is to continue to exist as an independent state’ (p. 225). UCL SSEES Andrew Wilson Hønneland, Geir. Russia and the Arctic: Environment, Identity and Foreign Policy. Library of Arctic Studies. I. B. Tauris, London and New York, 2016. xiv + 205 pp. Maps. Notes. Bibliography. Index. £64.00. This book begins with a question: what do the Russians want in the Arctic? The question is set in context: ‘The Arctic is getting warmer, in more than one way’ (p. 1). Suddenly, after a long period in which the Arctic was barely considered except perhaps by military strategists during the Cold War, it has become a centre of international concern not only because of the effects of global warming on its fragile environment but also for other...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,886
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,749

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,290
Écart entre enseignants0,257 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Slavonic and East European ReviewMême sujetRussia and Soviet political economyTravaux en français237 207