MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379433229 · doi:10.1353/see.2008.0059

For Prophet and Tsar: Islam and Empire in Russia and Central Asia by Robert D. Crews (review)

2008· article· en· W4379433229 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Slavonic and East European Review · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCuban History and Society
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPrideHistoryLiteratureEnlightenmentValue (mathematics)EmpireLinguisticsSociologyLawEpistemologyPhilosophyPolitical scienceArtAncient historyMathematics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

REVIEWS 553 of Radishchev's main work; it ends with a consideration of Zhukovskii's Siberian diary. This book has its origins in a 1995 doctoral thesis. It is perhaps regret table that in revising the author was unable to take into account more recent work, since this is an area in which advances have been made and worthwhile arguments about the shape of the Russian Enlightenment are happening. In particular, not engaging with Andreas Schonle's account of the same corpus of texts (Authenticity andFiction in the Russian Literary Journey, iygo-1840, Cambridge, MA, 2000) seems like a missed opportunity to underscore the difference in these two complementary studies. But its value lies, above all, in the comprehensive coverage it gives to the canonical texts of Russian travel writing and more obscure works. Throughout Dickinson is attentive to the tension between the prescriptive nature of travel writing, which combined the utilitarian function of the travel guide, and itsother functions as a narra tive of personal growth and, most importantly forDickinson, a statement of national pride inRussia's achievement of parity with theWestern countries encountered by these writers. BreakingGroundhas littlenew to say about any of its constituent texts, but it offers a comprehensive account of the genre as a whole. The study ismarred by conceptual fuzziness in places. Dickinson consistently refers to the texts considered in thisbook as travel literature.But in fact her corpus of texts contains works that are not literaryand fall into the category of travelwriting of a much larger description. There isa tendency to use the term 'Grand Tour' too loosely as neither Kiukhel'beker nor Karamzin follow the the highly prescribed itineraryassociated with that rite of passage in the education of British elitemen. The term 'scientific' as a description of Radishchev's technique really needs to be unpacked in order to be helpful. Is itany different from empirical? Is itLinnaean or does it show the impact of advances, largely in the area of the chemical sciences, in theAcademy of Sciences? Given Radishchev's interest in natural philosophy itwould have been helpful to know. At times, her close readings are arguably off themark and do not corroborate the conclusions. Batiushkov's account of his military travels smack more of jingoism than literary sophistication. But ifone takes them more seriously as 'travel writing', then Dickinson's reading is open to questioning since Cirey, where Batiushkov found himself, is more than the place where Voltaire spent many of 'his most productive years'. It is the place where he wrote his most important works on Newtonian physics, which is surely to the point when Batiushkov records how he and his comrades affirm theirRussian identityby boasting of the immortal Lomonosov. These criticisms notwithstanding, this book makes an insightful contribution to a burgeoning area of research. StEdmundHall, Oxford Andrew Kahn Crews, Robert D. For ProphetandTsar: Islam andEmpire in Russia and Central Asia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2006. viii + 463 pp. Maps. Illustrations. Notes. Index. $29.95: ?19.95. The last ten years have seen something of a revolution in the study of Russia's Imperial past. Beginning, perhaps, with thework ofJames Forsyth and Yuri 554 SEER, 86, 3, JULY 2008 Slezkine on Siberia (Forsyth,A History of the Native Peoples ofSiberia,Cambridge, 1992; Slezkine, Arctic Mirrors: Russia and the Small Peoples of the North, Ithaca, NY, 1994), we now have excellent regional studies of the Volga-Kama Region and the Steppe ? Allen J. Frank's Muslim Religious InstitutionsinImperialRus sia (Leiden, 2001), Virginia Martin's Law and Custom in theSteppe (London, 2001); Robert Geraci's Window on the East (Ithaca, NY, 2001); Paul Werth's At the Margins ofOrthodoxy(Ithaca, NY, 2002); Michael Khodarkovsky's Russia's Steppe Frontier (Bloomington, IN, 2002) and Willard Sunderland's Taming the Wild Field: Colonization and Empire on the Russian Steppe (Ithaca, NY 2004) ? the Caucasus ? Moshe Gammer's Muslim Resistance to the Tsar (London, 1994), Austin Jersild's Orientalism and Empire (Montreal, 2002) and Nicholas Breyfogle's Heretics and Colonizers:ForgingRussia's Empire in theSouth Caucasus (Ithaca, NY, 2005) ? and Central Asia ? Adeeb Khalid's The Politics of Muslim Cultural Reform (Berkeley, CA, 1997), Daniel Brower's Turkestan and theFate of theRussian Empire (London...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,535
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,506

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,273
Écart entre enseignants0,245 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle