MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379433229 · doi:10.1353/see.2008.0059

For Prophet and Tsar: Islam and Empire in Russia and Central Asia by Robert D. Crews (review)

2008· article· en· W4379433229 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alexander Morrison

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Slavonic and East European Review · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCuban History and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrideHistoryLiteratureEnlightenmentValue (mathematics)EmpireLinguisticsSociologyLawEpistemologyPhilosophyPolitical scienceArtAncient historyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

REVIEWS 553 of Radishchev's main work; it ends with a consideration of Zhukovskii's Siberian diary. This book has its origins in a 1995 doctoral thesis. It is perhaps regret table that in revising the author was unable to take into account more recent work, since this is an area in which advances have been made and worthwhile arguments about the shape of the Russian Enlightenment are happening. In particular, not engaging with Andreas Schonle's account of the same corpus of texts (Authenticity andFiction in the Russian Literary Journey, iygo-1840, Cambridge, MA, 2000) seems like a missed opportunity to underscore the difference in these two complementary studies. But its value lies, above all, in the comprehensive coverage it gives to the canonical texts of Russian travel writing and more obscure works. Throughout Dickinson is attentive to the tension between the prescriptive nature of travel writing, which combined the utilitarian function of the travel guide, and itsother functions as a narra tive of personal growth and, most importantly forDickinson, a statement of national pride inRussia's achievement of parity with theWestern countries encountered by these writers. BreakingGroundhas littlenew to say about any of its constituent texts, but it offers a comprehensive account of the genre as a whole. The study ismarred by conceptual fuzziness in places. Dickinson consistently refers to the texts considered in thisbook as travel literature.But in fact her corpus of texts contains works that are not literaryand fall into the category of travelwriting of a much larger description. There isa tendency to use the term 'Grand Tour' too loosely as neither Kiukhel'beker nor Karamzin follow the the highly prescribed itineraryassociated with that rite of passage in the education of British elitemen. The term 'scientific' as a description of Radishchev's technique really needs to be unpacked in order to be helpful. Is itany different from empirical? Is itLinnaean or does it show the impact of advances, largely in the area of the chemical sciences, in theAcademy of Sciences? Given Radishchev's interest in natural philosophy itwould have been helpful to know. At times, her close readings are arguably off themark and do not corroborate the conclusions. Batiushkov's account of his military travels smack more of jingoism than literary sophistication. But ifone takes them more seriously as 'travel writing', then Dickinson's reading is open to questioning since Cirey, where Batiushkov found himself, is more than the place where Voltaire spent many of 'his most productive years'. It is the place where he wrote his most important works on Newtonian physics, which is surely to the point when Batiushkov records how he and his comrades affirm theirRussian identityby boasting of the immortal Lomonosov. These criticisms notwithstanding, this book makes an insightful contribution to a burgeoning area of research. StEdmundHall, Oxford Andrew Kahn Crews, Robert D. For ProphetandTsar: Islam andEmpire in Russia and Central Asia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2006. viii + 463 pp. Maps. Illustrations. Notes. Index. $29.95: ?19.95. The last ten years have seen something of a revolution in the study of Russia's Imperial past. Beginning, perhaps, with thework ofJames Forsyth and Yuri 554 SEER, 86, 3, JULY 2008 Slezkine on Siberia (Forsyth,A History of the Native Peoples ofSiberia,Cambridge, 1992; Slezkine, Arctic Mirrors: Russia and the Small Peoples of the North, Ithaca, NY, 1994), we now have excellent regional studies of the Volga-Kama Region and the Steppe ? Allen J. Frank's Muslim Religious InstitutionsinImperialRus sia (Leiden, 2001), Virginia Martin's Law and Custom in theSteppe (London, 2001); Robert Geraci's Window on the East (Ithaca, NY, 2001); Paul Werth's At the Margins ofOrthodoxy(Ithaca, NY, 2002); Michael Khodarkovsky's Russia's Steppe Frontier (Bloomington, IN, 2002) and Willard Sunderland's Taming the Wild Field: Colonization and Empire on the Russian Steppe (Ithaca, NY 2004) ? the Caucasus ? Moshe Gammer's Muslim Resistance to the Tsar (London, 1994), Austin Jersild's Orientalism and Empire (Montreal, 2002) and Nicholas Breyfogle's Heretics and Colonizers:ForgingRussia's Empire in theSouth Caucasus (Ithaca, NY, 2005) ? and Central Asia ? Adeeb Khalid's The Politics of Muslim Cultural Reform (Berkeley, CA, 1997), Daniel Brower's Turkestan and theFate of theRussian Empire (London...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Slavonic and East European ReviewSame topicCuban History and SocietyFrench-language works237,207