MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379519347 · doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2023-eular.751

OP0075 EFFICACY, SAFETY, PHARMACOKINETICS AND IMMUNOGENICITY OF REPEATED DOSING OF GSK3858279 IN PATIENTS WITH KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS: A PHASE I, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY

2023· article· en· W4379519347 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jagtar Singh Nijjar, Katharine Abbott-Banner, Riju Ray, Sam Munoz Vicente, J. H. Bentley, Catherine Muya, Sarah Siederer, Eirini Panoilia, Debra C. Bass, D. Fernando, Edward C. Emery

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueInflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western AustraliaMedical University - VarnaUniversidade Nova de LisboaKeele Universitylékařská fakulta Univerzity KarlovyLunds UniversitetLeids Universitair Medisch CentrumRegeneron PharmaceuticalsUniversiteit LeidenUniversity of LimerickVrije Universiteit BrusselUniversity of LeedsEli Lilly and CompanyAstraZenecaMedical University SofiaUniversity of SurreyPfizerStrykerHøgskulen på VestlandetUniverzita Karlova v Praze
Mots-clésMedicineWOMACOsteoarthritisPlaceboClinical endpointInternal medicineAdverse effectPhysical therapyDosingCCL17Randomized controlled trialInflammationPathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background Chronic pain is an unmet need in osteoarthritis (OA) as current therapies have limited analgesia and side effects. The chemokine CCL17 mediates inflammatory pain and blocking CCL17 (via anti-CCL17 monoclonal antibodies [mAb] or CCL17 knock-out) reduces pain and joint disease in murine arthritis. GSK3858279 is a novel, high affinity, human mAb that functionally inhibits CCL17. Objectives To present efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetic (PK) and immunogenicity data from Part B of a first-in-human, 2 part, phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled study evaluating GSK3858279 for OA pain (NCT03485365). Methods Participants with knee OA per ACR criteria, Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) score ≥2 and average daily pain score 4–9 by 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) were randomised (1:1) to weekly subcutaneous (SC) GSK3858279 or PBO for 8 weeks. Co-primary endpoints were change from baseline (CFB) to Week 8 in average and worst knee pain intensity. Participants completed a daily pain NRS. Pain medication was prohibited, except paracetamol (≤3g/day) as rescue medication (not 24 h before a study visit). Exploratory endpoints included CFB in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and function scores. Samples for analysis of GSK3858279 serum concentration and immunogenicity were collected to Week 20. A Bayesian repeated measures model using non-informative priors was fitted to CFB data; 95% credible intervals (CrI) for treatment differences were calculated. Results All 48 participants in Part B completed the study (2 participants in the PBO arm discontinued treatment). Participant characteristics were comparable, however more participants in the GSK3858279 arm were male and KL grade 4 (Table 1). GSK3858279 was rapidly absorbed after SC administration (median Tmax ~2 days), with steady concentrations predicted by Week 8. Anti-GSK3858279 Abs were detected in 5/24 (21%) and 1/24 (4%) participants who received GSK3858279 and PBO, respectively; PK profiles for these participants were consistent with profiles in those without anti-drug Abs. For the co-primary endpoints of average and worst knee pain intensity, GSK3858279 showed greater improvement vs PBO at all timepoints (Figure 1). At Week 8, the difference (95% CrI) in CFB for GSK3858279 vs PBO was −1.18 (−2.15, −0.20) and −1.09 (−2.29, 0.12) for average and worst knee pain intensity, respectively (probability of true difference <0: >99% and 96%). GSK3858279 showed greater improvement in WOMAC pain and function scores vs PBO (Figure 1). At Day 57, the difference (95% CrI) in CFB for GSK3858279 vs PBO was −1.41 (−2.35, −0.46) for pain and −1.29 (−2.28, −0.29) for function (probability of true difference <0: >99% for both). Adverse events (AE) occurred in 21/24 (88%) and 15/24 (63%) participants, GSK3858279 and PBO, respectively. There were no serious AEs or deaths. Conclusion Weekly dosing for 8 weeks with GSK3858279 has clinical activity (improved pain scores) and a favourable safety profile in patients with OA knee pain. These compelling data warrant further study of the effectiveness and safety of GSK3858279 in people with OA pain. Acknowledgements GSK employees Patricia Coyle (study programming lead) and Sheina Santos (study data management lead). Medical writing support, under direction of the authors, was provided by Carol A. Richter, PhD, Ashfield MedComms, United Kingdom, an Inizio company, and was funded by GSK. Disclosure of Interests Jagtar Singh Nijjar Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Kathy Abbott-Banner Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Riju Ray Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Sam Munoz Vicente Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Jane H. Bentley Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Catherine Muya Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Sarah Siederer Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Eirini Panoilia Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Damon Bass Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Disala Fernando Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Edward C. Emery Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,007
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,023

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,002
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,290
Écart entre enseignants0,278 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetInflammatory mediators and NSAID effectsTravaux en français237 207