The Power of Scenery: Frederick Law Olmsted and the Origin of the National Parks by Dennis Drabelle (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: The Power of Scenery: Frederick Law Olmsted and the Origin of the National Parks by Dennis Drabelle John Sandlos Drabelle, Dennis–The Power of Scenery: Frederick Law Olmsted and the Origin of the National Parks. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 2021. 272 p. Frederick Law Olmsted may not be a household name in North America, but thousands of people are exposed to the footprint of his ideas about landscape and environment in city parks throughout the continent. Most famous as the designer of New York’s Central Park, Olmsted established a blueprint for city parks that brought nature to the urban core, preserving remnant woodlands, establishing cultivated plots of vegetation that were appropriate to the surrounding landscape, and above all else, creating spaces that were open to an urban public craving a natural oasis from the surrounding built environment. Through the direct influence of Olmsted’s landscape architectural firm, or many of his acolytes who trained there, literally hundreds of urban parks in North America have incorporated his key design principles. Even my somewhat remote hometown of St. John’s, Newfoundland, hosts the very “Olmstedian” Bowering Park (designed in part by Canadian devotee Frederick Todd), which features lazy winding pathways, rustic pavilions, a curvy shoreline enclosing a bucolic duck pond, and a mix of gardens, fields, and forests that evoke a stroll through the countryside. If these city parks seem a far cry from big wild spaces, Dennis Drabelle’s The Power of Scenery makes a case for including Olmsted in the pantheon of conservation heroes—among them, Henry David Thoreau, George Catlin, and John Muir—who originally developed the idea of the national park. To make this argument, Drabelle focuses on Olmsted’s brief residency (1863–1965) in California as manager of the unsuccessful Mariposa gold mining venture. Here, he was appointed a commissioner of the Yosemite Valley land grant (which first designated the land a public reserve), penning a report on the Yosemite Valley that advocated managing the park along fairly strict preservationist lines, welcoming visitors to appreciate the natural beauty of the place but restricting the kind of commercial developments that had, according to Olmsted, defiled Niagara Falls. The report also called for an appropriation of funds from the state government to fund at least [End Page 209] some infrastructure for the newly envisioned Yosemite Park, but several other commissioners balked at the suggestion and urged the state governor to bury the report. Despite such suppression, Drabelle traces the dissemination of Olmsted’s ideas on the public preservation of natural reserves through the writer Samuel Bowles, who published sections of the Yosemite document in a popular book, Across the Continent, and advocated for the protection of Yosemite and Yellowstone region. According to Drabelle, then, one can follow a direct line from Olmsted’s visionary report to the creation of Yellowstone National Park in 1872, Yosemite’s eventual designation as a national park in 1890, and the general promulgation of the national park ideal throughout the United States, Canada, and eventually the globe. Drabelle’s book will certainly be of great interest to anybody interested in the origins of the national parks. With vivid and lively prose, he skillfully weaves a portrait of the intellectual milieu that generated the national park movement, including America’s inferiority complex with respect to the great cultural monuments and cities of Europe (and hence the desire to create monuments out of nature), the growing aesthetic veneration of the sublime mountainous landscapes of the West, and the desire to retain public ownership of natural wonders as a hedge against their commercialization. Across the Continent succeeds at capturing the passion of the early national park advocates, mobilizing from a wealth of sources the words, deeds, and passions of the early wilderness preservation movement. Drabelle is somewhat less successful at putting Olmsted at the centre of this narrative. Much of the book’s storyline focuses intently on other aspects of Olmsted’s career: the early days designing Central Park, and later projects such as the creation of park landscapes at Niagara Falls and the Biltmore Estate in North Carolina, all somewhat peripheral to his work on the national parks. Indeed, Olmsted...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,019 | 0,009 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».