MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379619797 · doi:10.1353/his.2023.a899617

The Power of Scenery: Frederick Law Olmsted and the Origin of the National Parks by Dennis Drabelle (review)

2023· article· en· W4379619797 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
John Sandlos

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoire sociale · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPower (physics)Landscape architectBlueprintWoodlandPublic parkHistoryNational parkLawArchaeologyGeographyLandscape architectureArtPolitical scienceVisual artsCivil engineeringEngineeringEnvironmental planning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Power of Scenery: Frederick Law Olmsted and the Origin of the National Parks by Dennis Drabelle John Sandlos Drabelle, Dennis–The Power of Scenery: Frederick Law Olmsted and the Origin of the National Parks. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 2021. 272 p. Frederick Law Olmsted may not be a household name in North America, but thousands of people are exposed to the footprint of his ideas about landscape and environment in city parks throughout the continent. Most famous as the designer of New York’s Central Park, Olmsted established a blueprint for city parks that brought nature to the urban core, preserving remnant woodlands, establishing cultivated plots of vegetation that were appropriate to the surrounding landscape, and above all else, creating spaces that were open to an urban public craving a natural oasis from the surrounding built environment. Through the direct influence of Olmsted’s landscape architectural firm, or many of his acolytes who trained there, literally hundreds of urban parks in North America have incorporated his key design principles. Even my somewhat remote hometown of St. John’s, Newfoundland, hosts the very “Olmstedian” Bowering Park (designed in part by Canadian devotee Frederick Todd), which features lazy winding pathways, rustic pavilions, a curvy shoreline enclosing a bucolic duck pond, and a mix of gardens, fields, and forests that evoke a stroll through the countryside. If these city parks seem a far cry from big wild spaces, Dennis Drabelle’s The Power of Scenery makes a case for including Olmsted in the pantheon of conservation heroes—among them, Henry David Thoreau, George Catlin, and John Muir—who originally developed the idea of the national park. To make this argument, Drabelle focuses on Olmsted’s brief residency (1863–1965) in California as manager of the unsuccessful Mariposa gold mining venture. Here, he was appointed a commissioner of the Yosemite Valley land grant (which first designated the land a public reserve), penning a report on the Yosemite Valley that advocated managing the park along fairly strict preservationist lines, welcoming visitors to appreciate the natural beauty of the place but restricting the kind of commercial developments that had, according to Olmsted, defiled Niagara Falls. The report also called for an appropriation of funds from the state government to fund at least [End Page 209] some infrastructure for the newly envisioned Yosemite Park, but several other commissioners balked at the suggestion and urged the state governor to bury the report. Despite such suppression, Drabelle traces the dissemination of Olmsted’s ideas on the public preservation of natural reserves through the writer Samuel Bowles, who published sections of the Yosemite document in a popular book, Across the Continent, and advocated for the protection of Yosemite and Yellowstone region. According to Drabelle, then, one can follow a direct line from Olmsted’s visionary report to the creation of Yellowstone National Park in 1872, Yosemite’s eventual designation as a national park in 1890, and the general promulgation of the national park ideal throughout the United States, Canada, and eventually the globe. Drabelle’s book will certainly be of great interest to anybody interested in the origins of the national parks. With vivid and lively prose, he skillfully weaves a portrait of the intellectual milieu that generated the national park movement, including America’s inferiority complex with respect to the great cultural monuments and cities of Europe (and hence the desire to create monuments out of nature), the growing aesthetic veneration of the sublime mountainous landscapes of the West, and the desire to retain public ownership of natural wonders as a hedge against their commercialization. Across the Continent succeeds at capturing the passion of the early national park advocates, mobilizing from a wealth of sources the words, deeds, and passions of the early wilderness preservation movement. Drabelle is somewhat less successful at putting Olmsted at the centre of this narrative. Much of the book’s storyline focuses intently on other aspects of Olmsted’s career: the early days designing Central Park, and later projects such as the creation of park landscapes at Niagara Falls and the Biltmore Estate in North Carolina, all somewhat peripheral to his work on the national parks. Indeed, Olmsted...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistoire socialeSame topicAmerican Environmental and Regional HistoryFrench-language works237,207