MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379622760 · doi:10.1353/mlr.2002.a828080

Homo Narrans: The Poetics and Anthropology of Oral Literature by John D. Niles (review)

2002· article· en· W4379622760 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andrew Taylor

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Modern Language Review · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueDigital Humanities and Scholarship
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFolklorePoeticsOralityOral poetryPoetryOral traditionTributeLiteratureHistoryArtFolkloristicsAppropriationAnthropologyArt historySociologyLiteracyPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

REVIEWS Homo Narrans: The Poetics and Anthropology of Oral Literature. By John D. Niles. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 1999. ix + 28opp. $45; ?33.50. Homo Narrans is a tribute to what John Niles calls the 'strong tradition bearer', the poet-singer who draws upon a long-standing tradition yet modines it according to personal values and in response to a particular audience. Niles resists any tendency to sentimentalize folk artists. As he argues, after a biting account of the packaging of Appalachian folklore, 'the "folk" are not the people who used to inhabit mountain cabins sixty or seventy years ago. They are our neighbors, ourselves' (p. 45). His primary examples are modern Scottish travellers, including Jeannie Robertson, whose 'discovery' in the 1950s marks the Scottish folk-song revival, her daughter Lizzie Higgins, Lizzie's cousin Stanley Robertson, and the enthusiasticDuncan Williamson. They are dedicated and often competitive performers and critical listeners. Raised in communities in which everyone is expected to be able to sing and tell stories, these men and women have been born with exceptional abilities which they have cultivated assiduously. A fuller appreciation of their art, Niles argues, can illuminate the Old English term giedd, which is not quite modern English 'poetry', but a broad term for heightened language and one that always retains strong associations with orality. This in turn will illuminate the art of Beowulf, a written poem that draws on oral traditions. Niles provides a well-documented and unusually readable and sensible synthesis of much of the work that has been done on oral culture. Admittedly, many of his conclusions will be relatively familiar. That the notion of a pure oral folk art that can only be corrupted by writing or by print is romantic nonsense; that the oral performer reinforces communal values; that the audiences play a crucial role in passing on a tradition; that oral performance is a somatic art, grounded in the performer's body: all this is widely accepted. There is, however, much fresh material in Homo Narrans, including lengthy interviews with Duncan Williamson and Stanley Robert? son, going back to the 1980s. These give new insight into the relation between songs and social fictions, as when Williamson describes his show of anger at his daughters' elopements, which were carried out according to well-establishedcustoms ofthe kind echoed in many ballads. The interviews also show the powers of critical listening and memorization of the skilled singer. These abilities are described most fully in the case of Williamson, who actually visualizes the singers he has learnt from, as they go through their songs word by word, just as if sending him a phone message, to use his own metaphor. Many of Niles's informants do not just imitate earlier singers, but have a strong sense that in singing they commune directly with the dead who taught them, often parents and grandparents. Here too, Niles's detailed interviews turn what might now seem the commonplaces of the field into something far richer. Homo Narrans is more or less equally divided between two of Niles's great loves, Scottish folk-song and Beowulf. Like many scholars, Niles favours a late date forthe poem's composition, some time during the tenth century, when there was a revival of vernacular learning and a political need to integrate Angles, Saxons, and Danes. He sees Beowulf as a work that combines the older tradition of ritualized discourse or giedd with tenth-century statecraft. For the reader of Beowulf, Niles provides a deeper understanding of what such a cultural transition might have entailed. He also helps bring the figure of the scop to life, showing just how far traditional singers may vary in their practice, how they combine their individual taste with their role as the guardians of a communal tradition, how eagerly, even greedily, they reach for new stories, which for them are as valuable as currency, and how they negotiate through periods ofimmense technological and social changes. At the same time, Niles offersan MLR, 97.4, 2002 925 eloquent tribute to Scottish folk-song, not as the artless expression of some primitive innocence but as a modern form of giedd. University of Ottawa Andrew Taylor The...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,007
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,024

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0030,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,003
Communication savante0,0040,006
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,037
Tête enseignante GPT0,264
Écart entre enseignants0,226 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2002
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Modern Language ReviewMême sujetDigital Humanities and ScholarshipTravaux en français237 207