MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379622760 · doi:10.1353/mlr.2002.a828080

Homo Narrans: The Poetics and Anthropology of Oral Literature by John D. Niles (review)

2002· article· en· W4379622760 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andrew Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Modern Language Review · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDigital Humanities and Scholarship
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFolklorePoeticsOralityOral poetryPoetryOral traditionTributeLiteratureHistoryArtFolkloristicsAppropriationAnthropologyArt historySociologyLiteracyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

REVIEWS Homo Narrans: The Poetics and Anthropology of Oral Literature. By John D. Niles. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 1999. ix + 28opp. $45; ?33.50. Homo Narrans is a tribute to what John Niles calls the 'strong tradition bearer', the poet-singer who draws upon a long-standing tradition yet modines it according to personal values and in response to a particular audience. Niles resists any tendency to sentimentalize folk artists. As he argues, after a biting account of the packaging of Appalachian folklore, 'the "folk" are not the people who used to inhabit mountain cabins sixty or seventy years ago. They are our neighbors, ourselves' (p. 45). His primary examples are modern Scottish travellers, including Jeannie Robertson, whose 'discovery' in the 1950s marks the Scottish folk-song revival, her daughter Lizzie Higgins, Lizzie's cousin Stanley Robertson, and the enthusiasticDuncan Williamson. They are dedicated and often competitive performers and critical listeners. Raised in communities in which everyone is expected to be able to sing and tell stories, these men and women have been born with exceptional abilities which they have cultivated assiduously. A fuller appreciation of their art, Niles argues, can illuminate the Old English term giedd, which is not quite modern English 'poetry', but a broad term for heightened language and one that always retains strong associations with orality. This in turn will illuminate the art of Beowulf, a written poem that draws on oral traditions. Niles provides a well-documented and unusually readable and sensible synthesis of much of the work that has been done on oral culture. Admittedly, many of his conclusions will be relatively familiar. That the notion of a pure oral folk art that can only be corrupted by writing or by print is romantic nonsense; that the oral performer reinforces communal values; that the audiences play a crucial role in passing on a tradition; that oral performance is a somatic art, grounded in the performer's body: all this is widely accepted. There is, however, much fresh material in Homo Narrans, including lengthy interviews with Duncan Williamson and Stanley Robert? son, going back to the 1980s. These give new insight into the relation between songs and social fictions, as when Williamson describes his show of anger at his daughters' elopements, which were carried out according to well-establishedcustoms ofthe kind echoed in many ballads. The interviews also show the powers of critical listening and memorization of the skilled singer. These abilities are described most fully in the case of Williamson, who actually visualizes the singers he has learnt from, as they go through their songs word by word, just as if sending him a phone message, to use his own metaphor. Many of Niles's informants do not just imitate earlier singers, but have a strong sense that in singing they commune directly with the dead who taught them, often parents and grandparents. Here too, Niles's detailed interviews turn what might now seem the commonplaces of the field into something far richer. Homo Narrans is more or less equally divided between two of Niles's great loves, Scottish folk-song and Beowulf. Like many scholars, Niles favours a late date forthe poem's composition, some time during the tenth century, when there was a revival of vernacular learning and a political need to integrate Angles, Saxons, and Danes. He sees Beowulf as a work that combines the older tradition of ritualized discourse or giedd with tenth-century statecraft. For the reader of Beowulf, Niles provides a deeper understanding of what such a cultural transition might have entailed. He also helps bring the figure of the scop to life, showing just how far traditional singers may vary in their practice, how they combine their individual taste with their role as the guardians of a communal tradition, how eagerly, even greedily, they reach for new stories, which for them are as valuable as currency, and how they negotiate through periods ofimmense technological and social changes. At the same time, Niles offersan MLR, 97.4, 2002 925 eloquent tribute to Scottish folk-song, not as the artless expression of some primitive innocence but as a modern form of giedd. University of Ottawa Andrew Taylor The...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.685
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Modern Language ReviewSame topicDigital Humanities and ScholarshipFrench-language works237,207