MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379624382 · doi:10.1353/mlr.2005.a826744

The Sounds of Contemporary French: Articulation and Diversity by Aidan Coveney (review)

2005· article· en· W4379624382 sur OpenAlex
David Hornsby

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Modern Language Review · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiquePhonetics and Phonology Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésArticulation (sociology)FrenchHistoryDiversity (politics)HumanitiesLinguisticsAnthropologyArtSociologyPhilosophyPolitical scienceLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

226 Reviews on the need for future research into the effectsof the Haitian revolution. One area in particular which is neglected by the strictly historical focus is the cultural influence of the revolution. Nevertheless, this is an impressive, timely collection, one which draws together evidence from France, Britain, Germany, Guadeloupe, Colombia, Cuba, Louisiana, and the eastern seaboard of the United States to suggest the farreaching , multifarious influences ofthe firstsuccessful slave revolt in the New World. University of the West Indies Martin Munro The Sounds of Contemporary French: A rticulation and Diversity. By Aidan Coveney. Exeter: Elm Bank Publications. x + 2i4pp. ?19.99. ISBN 1-902454-02-2. The stated aim of this volume is to 'define a part of what it means to be a native speaker of French' (p. ix). Using labiograms taken from filmed material produced by Bothorel and others at the University of Strasbourg (Andre Bothorel, Pela Si? mon, Francois Wioland, and Jean-Pierre Zerling, Cineradiographie des voyelles et consonnes du francais (Strasbourg: Institut de Phonetique, 1986)), Aidan Coveney offers a detailed articulatory description of the phonemes of French. There are interesting cross-linguistic comparisons, showing how these speech sounds are represented in other languages, and historical light is thrown where appropriate on the development of modern French phonemes, helping to explain their sometimes idiosyncratic real? ization in the orthographic system (see e.g. the discussion of/o/ and /ce/,p. 88). The description of French consonants (Chapter 2) reveals a picture farmore diverse and complex than most accounts suggest. Particularly enlightening here are the ana? lyses of the palatal nasal /ji/,usually assumed rather simplistically to be giving way to \nj\in what Coveney calls supra-local French, and ofthe many variants of/r/ used in differentvarieties of French worldwide. A similarly meticulous description of vowels follows in Chapter 3, which takes up around a third of the book. Here Coveney again addresses issues which are generally ignored in introductory works. Fronting of back vowels, famously reported by Martinet (1958) as C'est jeuli, le Mareuc (reprinted in Andre Martinet, Le Franfais sansfard (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1969), pp. 191-208), is subjected to close analysis, and the tongue position of frontrounded vowels relative to their unrounded counterparts?a question overlooked in traditional accounts, which distinguish only the four phonemic vowel heights?is also examined in detail. There is a full and clear overview of lip-rounding in French vowels, and a very interesting description of Canadian vowels at the end of the chapter. While Chapters 2 and 3 describe the sounds in isolation, Chapter 4 considers the effectsof connected-speech processes. Again Coveney discusses a wide range of phenomena in impressive detail, from vowel harmonization to consonant-cluster simplification and assimilation, showing how sociolinguistic factors such as register may play a role. The author intends his work 'primarily for readers in Modern Languages, in the UK and other anglophone countries' (p. ix), but he does not specify at what level, and undergraduates without a prior grounding in phonetics will probably find it dif? ficult. Of all descriptive linguists, writers on phonetics have perhaps the hardest task. However precisely they are presented in articulatory terms, ultimately one needs to hear the sounds described in order to appreciate the differences between them, and Coveney's thorough and well-researched work can hardly be blamed if this reviewer was leftstruggling with his uvular trills and apical taps. A more important criticism, however, given the importance accorded to the Strasbourg data, is that the labiograms are sometimes a little difficultto follow, particularly when multiple lines are used on the same diagram to represent differentsounds. The book is none the less written with admirable clarity,and teachers especially will welcome the frequent comparisons MLRy ioo.i, 2005 227 between French sounds and their English counterparts. Filling a pressing need for a good accessible guide in English to the phonetics of French, this impressive volume is a very welcome contribution. University of Kent David Hornsby Thinking French Translation: A Course in Translation Method. French to English. By Sandor Hervey and Ian Higgins. Second Edition. London and New York: Routledge. 2002. xvi + 287pp. ?65 (pbk ?18.99). ISBN 0-415-25521...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,659
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,291

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,040
Tête enseignante GPT0,346
Écart entre enseignants0,307 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle