MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379624382 · doi:10.1353/mlr.2005.a826744

The Sounds of Contemporary French: Articulation and Diversity by Aidan Coveney (review)

2005· article· en· W4379624382 on OpenAlex
David Hornsby

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Modern Language Review · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPhonetics and Phonology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArticulation (sociology)FrenchHistoryDiversity (politics)HumanitiesLinguisticsAnthropologyArtSociologyPhilosophyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

226 Reviews on the need for future research into the effectsof the Haitian revolution. One area in particular which is neglected by the strictly historical focus is the cultural influence of the revolution. Nevertheless, this is an impressive, timely collection, one which draws together evidence from France, Britain, Germany, Guadeloupe, Colombia, Cuba, Louisiana, and the eastern seaboard of the United States to suggest the farreaching , multifarious influences ofthe firstsuccessful slave revolt in the New World. University of the West Indies Martin Munro The Sounds of Contemporary French: A rticulation and Diversity. By Aidan Coveney. Exeter: Elm Bank Publications. x + 2i4pp. ?19.99. ISBN 1-902454-02-2. The stated aim of this volume is to 'define a part of what it means to be a native speaker of French' (p. ix). Using labiograms taken from filmed material produced by Bothorel and others at the University of Strasbourg (Andre Bothorel, Pela Si? mon, Francois Wioland, and Jean-Pierre Zerling, Cineradiographie des voyelles et consonnes du francais (Strasbourg: Institut de Phonetique, 1986)), Aidan Coveney offers a detailed articulatory description of the phonemes of French. There are interesting cross-linguistic comparisons, showing how these speech sounds are represented in other languages, and historical light is thrown where appropriate on the development of modern French phonemes, helping to explain their sometimes idiosyncratic real? ization in the orthographic system (see e.g. the discussion of/o/ and /ce/,p. 88). The description of French consonants (Chapter 2) reveals a picture farmore diverse and complex than most accounts suggest. Particularly enlightening here are the ana? lyses of the palatal nasal /ji/,usually assumed rather simplistically to be giving way to \nj\in what Coveney calls supra-local French, and ofthe many variants of/r/ used in differentvarieties of French worldwide. A similarly meticulous description of vowels follows in Chapter 3, which takes up around a third of the book. Here Coveney again addresses issues which are generally ignored in introductory works. Fronting of back vowels, famously reported by Martinet (1958) as C'est jeuli, le Mareuc (reprinted in Andre Martinet, Le Franfais sansfard (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1969), pp. 191-208), is subjected to close analysis, and the tongue position of frontrounded vowels relative to their unrounded counterparts?a question overlooked in traditional accounts, which distinguish only the four phonemic vowel heights?is also examined in detail. There is a full and clear overview of lip-rounding in French vowels, and a very interesting description of Canadian vowels at the end of the chapter. While Chapters 2 and 3 describe the sounds in isolation, Chapter 4 considers the effectsof connected-speech processes. Again Coveney discusses a wide range of phenomena in impressive detail, from vowel harmonization to consonant-cluster simplification and assimilation, showing how sociolinguistic factors such as register may play a role. The author intends his work 'primarily for readers in Modern Languages, in the UK and other anglophone countries' (p. ix), but he does not specify at what level, and undergraduates without a prior grounding in phonetics will probably find it dif? ficult. Of all descriptive linguists, writers on phonetics have perhaps the hardest task. However precisely they are presented in articulatory terms, ultimately one needs to hear the sounds described in order to appreciate the differences between them, and Coveney's thorough and well-researched work can hardly be blamed if this reviewer was leftstruggling with his uvular trills and apical taps. A more important criticism, however, given the importance accorded to the Strasbourg data, is that the labiograms are sometimes a little difficultto follow, particularly when multiple lines are used on the same diagram to represent differentsounds. The book is none the less written with admirable clarity,and teachers especially will welcome the frequent comparisons MLRy ioo.i, 2005 227 between French sounds and their English counterparts. Filling a pressing need for a good accessible guide in English to the phonetics of French, this impressive volume is a very welcome contribution. University of Kent David Hornsby Thinking French Translation: A Course in Translation Method. French to English. By Sandor Hervey and Ian Higgins. Second Edition. London and New York: Routledge. 2002. xvi + 287pp. ?65 (pbk ?18.99). ISBN 0-415-25521...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.659
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it