MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379803936 · doi:10.1353/nai.2022.a863595

Law's Indigenous Ethics by John Borrows (review)

2022· article· en· W4379803936 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Keith Richotte

Notice bibliographique

RevueNative American and Indigenous Studies · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueLaw in Society and Culture
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIndigenousDecolonizationRhetoricDoctrinePolitical scienceLawSociologyEnvironmental ethicsPhilosophyPoliticsLinguistics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Law's Indigenous Ethics by John Borrows Keith Richotte Jr. (bio) Law's Indigenous Ethics by John Borrows University of Toronto Press, 2020 THERE IS MUCH (very understandable) rhetoric in Indigenous studies about decolonizing various institutions and structures. Yet guidance on how to go about decolonizing is far less abundant than the calls to do so. The very ambitiousness of such a project is matched only by its daunting nature. How does one go about the work of decolonization? Obviously many have sought to accomplish such ends in many contexts and have done so long before we had the language that we presently use in the academy. Nonetheless, chronicles of acts of resistance and calls for change far outnumber models for how to effectuate the type of change that would benefit the Indigenous world. Consequently, we are fortunate to have a scholar such as John Borrows to offer guidance as we continue to collectively try to figure it out. The prolific Borrows's new book, Law's Indigenous Ethics, should be read by anyone who is interested in how to think about the decolonization project in a practical, actionable way. Admittedly, to those only looking at the cover and a blurb it might seem to have a limited audience: it is a work about Canadian law and Aboriginal peoples, particularly the Anishinaabe. Yet this critical text can speak to a broad audience because it takes seriously the question of how we might strategize decolonizing efforts in the future. The legal cases and doctrine as well as the Canadian context are central to Borrows's argument, but they are not barriers to those whose work and region of study do not overlap. Borrows is an exceptionally skillful and gentle writer, and his wisdom will be obvious to anyone who is not intimidated by his framing devices. On the topic of framing devices, Borrows divides his text into seven chapters, each one thematically consistent with what the author describes as the "Seven Grandmother/Grandfather Teachings of the Anishinaabe" (14): Zaagi'idiwin (love), Debwewin (truth), Zoongide'ewin (bravery), Dabaadendizowin (humility), Nibwaakaawin (wisdom), Gwayakwaadiziwin (honesty), and Manaaji'idiwin (respect). By examining a legal question that is concerned with land through these lenses, Borrows demonstrates how and where it is possible to invert the colonially imposed structures of law and [End Page 146] legal reasoning to offer Indigenous legal reasoning that can lead to a more just, coherent, and integrated body of law for everyone involved. This is not to suggest that Borrows naively asserts that the Seven Grandmother/Grandfather Teachings will cure the Indigenous world or the colonial state of their own accord. Rather, he makes a more sophisticated and reasonable argument that the Seven Teachings offer another mode of legal reasoning to solve modern problems. Each chapter demonstrates how this can be accomplished. Nor is Borrows unaware that the Seven Teachings are criticized in some parts of the Indigenous world as modern inventions that are insufficiently connected to past practices or philosophical conceptions. As is his way, Borrows converts this alleged weakness into a strength. He forcefully demonstrates both that the decolonization effort must first begin at home and the possibilities that are available by asserting an active Indigenous legal philosophy. "Indigenous law can be a living and dynamic force if not tethered to what is regarded as being integral to aboriginal communities prior to European contact or sovereignty. The Seven Grandmother/Grandfather Teachings could broaden our legal imagination if they are regarded as current expressions of Indigenous authority in the modern world, regardless of whether their origin is old or new" (15). Law's Indigenous Ethics is an excellent book that has many uses. A terrific text for courses in Canadian law, comparative law, and comparative Indigenous problem solving, it perhaps most usefully offers a proactive vision for anyone interested in decolonization efforts throughout the Indigenous world. [End Page 147] Keith Richotte KEITH RICHOTTE JR., Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians, is associate justice of the Turtle Mountain Court of Appeals and associate professor of American studies, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Copyright © 2022 Regents of the University of Minnesota

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,566
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0090,003
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,041
Tête enseignante GPT0,371
Écart entre enseignants0,330 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNative American and Indigenous StudiesMême sujetLaw in Society and CultureTravaux en français237 207