MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379803936 · doi:10.1353/nai.2022.a863595

Law's Indigenous Ethics by John Borrows (review)

2022· article· en· W4379803936 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Keith Richotte

Bibliographic record

VenueNative American and Indigenous Studies · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLaw in Society and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousDecolonizationRhetoricDoctrinePolitical scienceLawSociologyEnvironmental ethicsPhilosophyPoliticsLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Law's Indigenous Ethics by John Borrows Keith Richotte Jr. (bio) Law's Indigenous Ethics by John Borrows University of Toronto Press, 2020 THERE IS MUCH (very understandable) rhetoric in Indigenous studies about decolonizing various institutions and structures. Yet guidance on how to go about decolonizing is far less abundant than the calls to do so. The very ambitiousness of such a project is matched only by its daunting nature. How does one go about the work of decolonization? Obviously many have sought to accomplish such ends in many contexts and have done so long before we had the language that we presently use in the academy. Nonetheless, chronicles of acts of resistance and calls for change far outnumber models for how to effectuate the type of change that would benefit the Indigenous world. Consequently, we are fortunate to have a scholar such as John Borrows to offer guidance as we continue to collectively try to figure it out. The prolific Borrows's new book, Law's Indigenous Ethics, should be read by anyone who is interested in how to think about the decolonization project in a practical, actionable way. Admittedly, to those only looking at the cover and a blurb it might seem to have a limited audience: it is a work about Canadian law and Aboriginal peoples, particularly the Anishinaabe. Yet this critical text can speak to a broad audience because it takes seriously the question of how we might strategize decolonizing efforts in the future. The legal cases and doctrine as well as the Canadian context are central to Borrows's argument, but they are not barriers to those whose work and region of study do not overlap. Borrows is an exceptionally skillful and gentle writer, and his wisdom will be obvious to anyone who is not intimidated by his framing devices. On the topic of framing devices, Borrows divides his text into seven chapters, each one thematically consistent with what the author describes as the "Seven Grandmother/Grandfather Teachings of the Anishinaabe" (14): Zaagi'idiwin (love), Debwewin (truth), Zoongide'ewin (bravery), Dabaadendizowin (humility), Nibwaakaawin (wisdom), Gwayakwaadiziwin (honesty), and Manaaji'idiwin (respect). By examining a legal question that is concerned with land through these lenses, Borrows demonstrates how and where it is possible to invert the colonially imposed structures of law and [End Page 146] legal reasoning to offer Indigenous legal reasoning that can lead to a more just, coherent, and integrated body of law for everyone involved. This is not to suggest that Borrows naively asserts that the Seven Grandmother/Grandfather Teachings will cure the Indigenous world or the colonial state of their own accord. Rather, he makes a more sophisticated and reasonable argument that the Seven Teachings offer another mode of legal reasoning to solve modern problems. Each chapter demonstrates how this can be accomplished. Nor is Borrows unaware that the Seven Teachings are criticized in some parts of the Indigenous world as modern inventions that are insufficiently connected to past practices or philosophical conceptions. As is his way, Borrows converts this alleged weakness into a strength. He forcefully demonstrates both that the decolonization effort must first begin at home and the possibilities that are available by asserting an active Indigenous legal philosophy. "Indigenous law can be a living and dynamic force if not tethered to what is regarded as being integral to aboriginal communities prior to European contact or sovereignty. The Seven Grandmother/Grandfather Teachings could broaden our legal imagination if they are regarded as current expressions of Indigenous authority in the modern world, regardless of whether their origin is old or new" (15). Law's Indigenous Ethics is an excellent book that has many uses. A terrific text for courses in Canadian law, comparative law, and comparative Indigenous problem solving, it perhaps most usefully offers a proactive vision for anyone interested in decolonization efforts throughout the Indigenous world. [End Page 147] Keith Richotte KEITH RICHOTTE JR., Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians, is associate justice of the Turtle Mountain Court of Appeals and associate professor of American studies, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Copyright © 2022 Regents of the University of Minnesota

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.566
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNative American and Indigenous StudiesSame topicLaw in Society and CultureFrench-language works237,207