MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379805338 · doi:10.1353/nai.2014.a843654

2010 NAISA Presidential Address: Practicing Native American and Indigenous Studies

2014· article· en· W4379805338 sur OpenAlex
Robert Warrior

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueNative American and Indigenous Studies · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIndigenousGratitudeMedia studiesPower (physics)Presidential systemPolitical scienceHistorySociologyLawPsychologyPoliticsSocial psychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

NAIS 1:1 SPRING 2014 2010 NAISA Presidential Address 3 ROBERT WARRIOR 2010 NAISA Presidential Address Practicing Native American and Indigenous Studies IN MAY 2007, I used this short, formal greeting in wazhashe i-e, or the Osage language, to open the plenary session that initiated the discussion of how or whether we should organize ourselves into what has become the Native American and Indigenous Studies Association, and I am pleased, standing here in the homelands of the O’odham people, to open my remarks this afternoon with this same greeting. I also want to dedicate these remarks today to everyone at the Osage Nation Language Program, especially the department ’s director, H. Mongrain Lookout, who taught me to say these words and many more.1 Many of you were part of that meeting in the Memorial Union at the University of Oklahoma, and I am gratified that you and so many others are here today. In greeting you in this way, I am gathering you all with a commitment of respect for who you are, where you come from, and what you have to contribute to our shared work. It also indicates my gratitude for your willingness to listen to what I have to say. I want to start with a quotation from Beatrice Medicine, a Dakota scholar whose work is familiar to many of you. As she said forty years ago about the Red Power movement that was sweeping North America, “The most critical and crucial component for Indian power might be termed, for lack of a better phrase, ‘intellectual’ power. . . . This portion of power would stem from wisdom and an awareness of the structure of power in the dominant society. Additionally, constant analysis, discussions, and weighing of the many fluctuating issues in the Indian world would seem essential.”2 Medicine said this four decades ago at the First Convocation of American I want to address everyone as friends and relatives I want to say a few words I am addressing you all. Robert Warrior NAIS 1:1 SPRING 2014 4 Indian Scholars at Princeton University here in the United States. That gathering was a remarkable event during a remarkable time, and many of the more than two hundred participants went on to make signal contributions to Indigenous life in the Americas and beyond. N. Scott Momaday and Vine Deloria Jr., who gave plenary addresses, are towering figures in Native studies in the United States. Alfonso Ortiz, who gave the third plenary and who taught then at Princeton, was a scholar of giant intellect . The published proceedings also include presentations by Cahuilla historian Rupert Costo, Luiseño painter Fritz Scholder, Diné educator and codetalker Samuel Billison, and Robert Bennett , the Oneida man who was the first Native person to run the U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs since Ely Parker in the middle of the nineteenth century. The convocation was decidedly focused on American Indian people in the United States, but Cree songwriter Buffy Sainte-Marie participated and Ojibway language teacher Harvey­ McCue, who was then at Trent University, showed up throughout the proceedings , representing what was happening then in Canadian institutions. Pare Hopa, the Cambridge-trained Maori anthropologist, was there as well. Each of these people contributed mightily in her or his own way to twentieth -century American Indian and Indigenous life.3 The gathering in Princeton deserves a much more prominent place among other meetings that have brought together scholars, writers, artists, and other intellectuals for the purpose of furthering Indigenous life, not just in the United States but throughout the world. Recalling it energizes me as someone who finds in such historical moments critical lessons as we tackle our own moment in history. The Princeton convocation, then, is one locus of our intellectual , scholarly, and artistic past. Several people who were there in 1970 are with us this afternoon at my invitation, and I would like you to join me in recognizing them for their myriad contributions to the work we now do.4 FIGURE 1. Beatrice Medicine (Lakota), pictured here later in her career. Although she wrote presciently and incisively about many issues crucial to the development of the field, her contributions to the...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,363
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0170,008
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,035
Tête enseignante GPT0,385
Écart entre enseignants0,350 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle