MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379805338 · doi:10.1353/nai.2014.a843654

2010 NAISA Presidential Address: Practicing Native American and Indigenous Studies

2014· article· en· W4379805338 on OpenAlex
Robert Warrior

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNative American and Indigenous Studies · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousGratitudeMedia studiesPower (physics)Presidential systemPolitical scienceHistorySociologyLawPsychologyPoliticsSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

NAIS 1:1 SPRING 2014 2010 NAISA Presidential Address 3 ROBERT WARRIOR 2010 NAISA Presidential Address Practicing Native American and Indigenous Studies IN MAY 2007, I used this short, formal greeting in wazhashe i-e, or the Osage language, to open the plenary session that initiated the discussion of how or whether we should organize ourselves into what has become the Native American and Indigenous Studies Association, and I am pleased, standing here in the homelands of the O’odham people, to open my remarks this afternoon with this same greeting. I also want to dedicate these remarks today to everyone at the Osage Nation Language Program, especially the department ’s director, H. Mongrain Lookout, who taught me to say these words and many more.1 Many of you were part of that meeting in the Memorial Union at the University of Oklahoma, and I am gratified that you and so many others are here today. In greeting you in this way, I am gathering you all with a commitment of respect for who you are, where you come from, and what you have to contribute to our shared work. It also indicates my gratitude for your willingness to listen to what I have to say. I want to start with a quotation from Beatrice Medicine, a Dakota scholar whose work is familiar to many of you. As she said forty years ago about the Red Power movement that was sweeping North America, “The most critical and crucial component for Indian power might be termed, for lack of a better phrase, ‘intellectual’ power. . . . This portion of power would stem from wisdom and an awareness of the structure of power in the dominant society. Additionally, constant analysis, discussions, and weighing of the many fluctuating issues in the Indian world would seem essential.”2 Medicine said this four decades ago at the First Convocation of American I want to address everyone as friends and relatives I want to say a few words I am addressing you all. Robert Warrior NAIS 1:1 SPRING 2014 4 Indian Scholars at Princeton University here in the United States. That gathering was a remarkable event during a remarkable time, and many of the more than two hundred participants went on to make signal contributions to Indigenous life in the Americas and beyond. N. Scott Momaday and Vine Deloria Jr., who gave plenary addresses, are towering figures in Native studies in the United States. Alfonso Ortiz, who gave the third plenary and who taught then at Princeton, was a scholar of giant intellect . The published proceedings also include presentations by Cahuilla historian Rupert Costo, Luiseño painter Fritz Scholder, Diné educator and codetalker Samuel Billison, and Robert Bennett , the Oneida man who was the first Native person to run the U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs since Ely Parker in the middle of the nineteenth century. The convocation was decidedly focused on American Indian people in the United States, but Cree songwriter Buffy Sainte-Marie participated and Ojibway language teacher Harvey­ McCue, who was then at Trent University, showed up throughout the proceedings , representing what was happening then in Canadian institutions. Pare Hopa, the Cambridge-trained Maori anthropologist, was there as well. Each of these people contributed mightily in her or his own way to twentieth -century American Indian and Indigenous life.3 The gathering in Princeton deserves a much more prominent place among other meetings that have brought together scholars, writers, artists, and other intellectuals for the purpose of furthering Indigenous life, not just in the United States but throughout the world. Recalling it energizes me as someone who finds in such historical moments critical lessons as we tackle our own moment in history. The Princeton convocation, then, is one locus of our intellectual , scholarly, and artistic past. Several people who were there in 1970 are with us this afternoon at my invitation, and I would like you to join me in recognizing them for their myriad contributions to the work we now do.4 FIGURE 1. Beatrice Medicine (Lakota), pictured here later in her career. Although she wrote presciently and incisively about many issues crucial to the development of the field, her contributions to the...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.363
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0170.008
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it