MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379930955 · doi:10.1353/aiq.2014.a564176

Playing Indian in the Works of Rebecca Belmore, Marilyn Dumont, and Ray Young Bear

2014· article· en· W4379930955 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe American Indian Quarterly · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIndigenousColonialismIdentity (music)Indian artIndian EnglishHollywoodFace (sociological concept)Indian literatureNative americanCONQUESTHistorySociologyMedia studiesAnthropologyArtLiteratureAestheticsArt historySocial scienceAncient history

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Playing Indian in the Works of Rebecca Belmore, Marilyn Dumont, and Ray Young Bear Laura Beard (bio) In Playing Indian, Philip J. Deloria discusses the ways in which non-Natives have performed their own ideas and notions of Indian identities to their own purposes. He traces Indian play from colonial times through to contemporary ones and reminds readers that while the Indianness being claimed in this Indian play “was critical to American identities, it necessarily went hand in hand with the dispossession and conquest of actual Indian people.”1 Cynthia L. Landrum echoes Deloria’s observation, noting that “the presence of actual Indians, persistently struggling to maintain land and sovereignty in the face of these constructs, necessitates the continued reconstruction of the savage over time and geography.”2 Non-Native peoples play Indian—in Hollywood movies, in dime-store novels, on television, as mascots for sports teams, in Halloween costumes—but Indians can play Indian as well. Indeed, playing with the “flattened-out pastiche” of Native stereotypes characterizes the work of many twentieth-century Native artists.3 This essay explores the cultural productions of Indigenous artists who sometimes “play Indian” in creating their own images of themselves and their communities. While Deloria’s discussion focused on the ways in which non-Natives perform notions of Native identity, many Native authors, artists, and performers have explored the discomforts of being expected to “play Indian” for members of a dominant society. Highlighted here are self-reflective works of three artists who are particularly pertinent to a discussion of the topic of playing Indian. Anishinaabe artist Rebecca Belmore uses a variety of art forms—including sculpture, installation, video, and performance—to address such issues as the stereotyping of Native people, the commoditization of Native bodies for souvenir items, [End Page 492] and the violence against Native women. Marilyn Dumont is a Métis poet from northeastern Alberta who uses her poetry in part to expose the injustices imposed upon Indigenous peoples in Canada. Mesquakie artist Ray Young Bear is a poet, novelist, drummer, and singer whose autobiographical metafiction explores the cross-cultural conflicts created by living within a tribal community with a strong sense of place and being a writer published by what he calls The Outside World. Although these artists come from different Native communities and traditions, looking at them together allows us to see how contemporary Native artists “play Indian” in order to critique the cultural performances of others who would seek to appropriate, absorb, and transform that social, cultural, political, and ethical space at the expense of real live Indian people. Their examples of playing Indian are thus critical in both senses of the word: crucial examples of the genre but also ones that raise objections to many components of the long-standing North American tradition of playing Indian. Rebecca Belmore (member of the Lac Seul First Nation, born in Upsala, Ontario) has been called one of “the most consistently productive and provocative Native North American artists over the past twenty years,” one who has “consistently nailed moments of crisis in public debates in Canada.”4 Social and political engagement is key to Belmore’s work, work that is often site specific and time specific. Belmore’s art is both powerful and powerfully integrated into the physical, social, and political landscapes in which she enacts her performances. Belmore’s self-portrait, True Grit, a Souvenir, is a six-foot-tall souvenir cushion on which she portrays herself posed in a football jersey, jeans, and cowboy boots. The portrait has been placed on a giant pillow with a floral background and a fringed edge. With both halves of the title engaging and resisting elements of popular and commercial culture, the artwork challenges any easy expectations about what Native art or Native identity should be.5 Belmore here refuses to play Indian to meet the desires or expectations of the non-Native society, yet she reminds her viewers that Natives are constantly being used as potentially profitable merchandise.6 As she notes in her artist’s statement, “I used myself as the central figure, the northern motif, the native Indian as marketable commodity, the artist as product. The souvenir is: ‘Rebecca Belmore...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,738
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,883

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,221
Écart entre enseignants0,215 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle