MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4380084899 · doi:10.1002/hon.3164_420

Final safety and efficacy results of copanlisib monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory iNHL: 6‐year follow‐up of CHRONOS‐1

2023· article· en· W4380084899 sur OpenAlexaff
Martin Dreyling, Armando Santoro, Luigina Mollica, Sirpa Leppä, George Follows, Georg Lenz, W. S. Kim, Arnon Nagler, Panayiotis Panayiotidis, Judit Demeter, Muhıt Özcan, Marina Kosinova, Mariano Provencio, Massimo Magagnoli, Krimo Bouabdallah, Dae Seog Heo, Colin Phipps Diong, Javier Muñoz, A. Cao, Florian Hiemeyer, Florence Odongo, J. Garcia‐Vargas, Barrett H. Childs, Pier Luigi Zinzani

Notice bibliographique

RevueHematological Oncology · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Organismes subventionnairesGilead SciencesEisaiSanofiServierAmgenPfizerCelgeneAstraZenecaEli Lilly and Company
Mots-clésMedicineInternal medicineAdverse effectRituximabFollicular lymphomaClinical endpointPhases of clinical researchLymphomaRefractory (planetary science)GastroenterologySurgeryOncologyChemotherapyClinical trial

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor copanlisib was approved for use in the US in 2017 as monotherapy in patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma (FL) who have progressed after ≥2 therapies based on results from the Phase II CHRONOS-1 study in patients with relapsed or refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) (Dreyling et al. J Clin Oncol 2017). Here, we describe efficacy and safety data at the 6-year follow-up. Methods: CHRONOS-1 enrolled patients with FL, marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), and Waldenström macroglobulinemia/lymphoplasmacytoid lymphoma (WM/LPL) who had received ≥2 therapies. Copanlisib 60 mg was administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. The primary efficacy endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per independent radiologic review (Cheson et al. J Clin Oncol 2007). Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). CTCAE v4.03 was used to grade adverse events (AEs). Results: 142 patients with iNHL (104 FL, 23 MZL, 8 SLL, 6 WM/LPL, 1 other) received treatment. 99.3% of patients had discontinued treatment by the data cut-off (June 30, 2022). During follow-up, 74% of patients (n = 105) received ≥1 line of subsequent systemic anti-cancer therapy, including 46% of patients treated with rituximab-based regimens. ORR was 59.9% (n = 85) with complete responses in 23 patients (16.2%). Median DoR was 14.9 months (mos) (range 0–80.6). With a median follow-up of 14 mos (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.3, 20.7), median PFS was 11.3 mos (range 0–82.1) with a 2-year PFS rate of 33%. With a median follow-up of 82.3 mos (95% CI: 79.3, 84.2), median OS was 59.1 mos (73 events, range 0.2–100.6) with a 6-year OS rate of 45% (Figure). Median duration of treatment was 6.0 mos (range 0.23–81.0). Transformation to aggressive lymphoma (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma) was not observed. Treatment was discontinued primarily due to radiologic disease progression (35.2%; n = 50) and AEs not associated with clinical disease progression (28.2%; n = 40). Copanlisib safety data were consistent with the 2-year follow-up (Dreyling et al. Am J Hematol 2020). The most common treatment-emergent AEs (all grades/grades 3–4) were infusion-related hyperglycemia (50.7%/39.4%), diarrhea (35.9%/8.5%), hypertension (29.6%/23.9%), neutropenia (29.6%/24.7%), and pyrexia (26.8%/4.2%). The research was funded by Bayer AG with medical writing and editorial assistance from Complete HealthVizion Keyword: Indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma Conflicts of interests pertinent to the abstract. M. Dreyling Consultant or advisory role: AstraZeneca, BeiGene, BMS/Celgene, Gilead/Kite, Janssen, Lilly/Loxo, Novartis, Roche Honoraria: AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Gilead/Kite, Janssen, Roche, Lilly, Novartis Research funding: AbbVie, Bayer, BMS/Celgene, Gilead/Kite, Janssen, Roche A. Santoro Consultant or advisory role: BMS (BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB)/SERVIER/GILEAD/PFIZER/EISAI/BAYER/MSD (MERCK SHARP & DOHME), SANOFI/ INCYTE Other remuneration: Speaker's Bureau: TAKEDA/BMS/ROCHE/ABB-VIE/AMGEN/CELGENE/SERVIER/GILEAD/ASTRAZENECA/PFIZER/LILLY/SANDOZ/EISAI/NOVARTIS/BAYER/MSD S. Leppä Consultant or advisory role: Gilead Sciences, Novartis, Roche, BeiGene, Orion Clinical, Incyte, Pfizer, SOBI Honoraria: Gilead Sciences, Novartis, Incyte Research funding: Roche, Bayer, Celgene, Novartis, Genmab, Hutchison MediPharma G. A. Follows Consultant or advisory role: AbbVie, Roche, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Centessa Honoraria: AbbVie, Roche, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Lilly Educational grants: Takeda G. Lenz Employment or leadership position: President elect German Lymphoma Alliance, Board of director German Lymphoma Alliance Consultant or advisory role: Roche, Janssen, Celgene, AstraZeneca, BMS, AbbVie, MorphoSys, Karyopharm, ADC, PentixaPharm, Hexal/Sandoz, Genase, Gilead, Bayer, Novartis, Takeda, NanoString, Incyte, Genmab, Constellation, Miltenyi, Sobi, Immagene, Lilly Honoraria: Roche, Bayer, Takeda, AbbVie, MorphoSys, Hexal/Sandoz, Janssen, Celgene, BMS, Incyte, Sobi Research funding: Roche, Gilead, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Celgene, Novartis, MorphoSys Educational grants: Janssen, BMS, AbbVie P. Panayiotidis Other remuneration: Bayer AG, clinical trial support M. Özcan Research funding: AbbVie, Bayer, Janssen, Roche, Takeda, MSD, Pfizer, Acerta Educational grants: AbbVie M. Kosinova Other remuneration: Bayer AG, clinical trial support M. Provencio Consultant or advisory role: AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb Company, Eli Lilly, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen Global Services, LLC, Laboratorios Pfizer Ltda., Merck, Takeda Oncology. Research funding: Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb Company, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Pierre Fabre Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Takeda Oncology. Educational grants: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb Company, Eli Lilly, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Pierre Fabre Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Other remuneration: PATENTS, ROYALTIES, OTHER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: P201731067. Prognosis methods for patients with folicular lymphoma. España. 16/05/2017. FIBHUPH; PCT/ES2018/070463. Method for designing J. Munoz Consultant or advisory role: Pharmacyclics/AbbVie, Bayer, Gilead/Kite Pharma, Pfizer, Janssen, Juno/Celgene, BMS, Kyowa, Alexion, Fosun Kite, Innovent, Seattle Genetics, Debiopharm, Karyopharm, Genmab, ADC Therapeutics, Epizyme, BeiGene, Servier, Novartis, MorphoSys/Incyte, MEI, Zodiac, TG Therapeutics, Lilly/Loxo Honoraria: Targeted Oncology, OncView, Curio, Kyowa, Physicians' Education Resource, and Seattle Genetics Research funding: Bayer, Gilead/Kite Pharma, Celgene, Merck, Portola, Incyte, Genentech, Pharmacyclics, Seattle Genetics, Janssen, Millennium Other remuneration: Speaker's Bureau: Gilead/Kite Pharma, Kyowa, Bayer, Pharmacyclics/Janssen, Seattle Genetics, Acrotech/Aurobindo, BeiGene, Verastem, AstraZeneca, Celgene/BMS, Genentech/Roche A. Cao Employment or leadership position: Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. F. Hiemeyer Employment or leadership position: Bayer AG F. Odongo Employment or leadership position: Bayer SA J. Garcia-Vargas Employment or leadership position: Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. B. H. Childs Employment or leadership position: Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. P. L. Zinzani Consultant or advisory role: SECURA BIO, CELLTRION, GILEAD, JANSSEN- CILAG, BMS, SERVIER, SANDOZ, MSD, ASTRAZENECA, TAKEDA, ROCHE, EUSAPHARMA, KYOWA KIRIN, NOVARTIS, ADC Therap., Incyte, BeiGene Other remuneration: Speaker's Bureau: CELLTRION, GILEAD, JANSSEN- CILAG, BMS, SERVIER, SANDOZ, MSD, ASTRAZENECA, TAKEDA, ROCHE, EUSAPHARMA, KYOWA KIRIN, NOVARTIS, ADC Therap., Incyte, BeiGene

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,032
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,350

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,040
Tête enseignante GPT0,317
Écart entre enseignants0,277 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHematological OncologyMême sujetLymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentTravaux en français237 207