MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380084899 · doi:10.1002/hon.3164_420

Final safety and efficacy results of copanlisib monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory iNHL: 6‐year follow‐up of CHRONOS‐1

2023· article· en· W4380084899 on OpenAlexaff
Martin Dreyling, Armando Santoro, Luigina Mollica, Sirpa Leppä, George Follows, Georg Lenz, W. S. Kim, Arnon Nagler, Panayiotis Panayiotidis, Judit Demeter, Muhıt Özcan, Marina Kosinova, Mariano Provencio, Massimo Magagnoli, Krimo Bouabdallah, Dae Seog Heo, Colin Phipps Diong, Javier Muñoz, A. Cao, Florian Hiemeyer, Florence Odongo, J. Garcia‐Vargas, Barrett H. Childs, Pier Luigi Zinzani

Bibliographic record

VenueHematological Oncology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
FundersGilead SciencesEisaiSanofiServierAmgenPfizerCelgeneAstraZenecaEli Lilly and Company
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineAdverse effectRituximabFollicular lymphomaClinical endpointPhases of clinical researchLymphomaRefractory (planetary science)GastroenterologySurgeryOncologyChemotherapyClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor copanlisib was approved for use in the US in 2017 as monotherapy in patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma (FL) who have progressed after ≥2 therapies based on results from the Phase II CHRONOS-1 study in patients with relapsed or refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) (Dreyling et al. J Clin Oncol 2017). Here, we describe efficacy and safety data at the 6-year follow-up. Methods: CHRONOS-1 enrolled patients with FL, marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), and Waldenström macroglobulinemia/lymphoplasmacytoid lymphoma (WM/LPL) who had received ≥2 therapies. Copanlisib 60 mg was administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. The primary efficacy endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per independent radiologic review (Cheson et al. J Clin Oncol 2007). Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). CTCAE v4.03 was used to grade adverse events (AEs). Results: 142 patients with iNHL (104 FL, 23 MZL, 8 SLL, 6 WM/LPL, 1 other) received treatment. 99.3% of patients had discontinued treatment by the data cut-off (June 30, 2022). During follow-up, 74% of patients (n = 105) received ≥1 line of subsequent systemic anti-cancer therapy, including 46% of patients treated with rituximab-based regimens. ORR was 59.9% (n = 85) with complete responses in 23 patients (16.2%). Median DoR was 14.9 months (mos) (range 0–80.6). With a median follow-up of 14 mos (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.3, 20.7), median PFS was 11.3 mos (range 0–82.1) with a 2-year PFS rate of 33%. With a median follow-up of 82.3 mos (95% CI: 79.3, 84.2), median OS was 59.1 mos (73 events, range 0.2–100.6) with a 6-year OS rate of 45% (Figure). Median duration of treatment was 6.0 mos (range 0.23–81.0). Transformation to aggressive lymphoma (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma) was not observed. Treatment was discontinued primarily due to radiologic disease progression (35.2%; n = 50) and AEs not associated with clinical disease progression (28.2%; n = 40). Copanlisib safety data were consistent with the 2-year follow-up (Dreyling et al. Am J Hematol 2020). The most common treatment-emergent AEs (all grades/grades 3–4) were infusion-related hyperglycemia (50.7%/39.4%), diarrhea (35.9%/8.5%), hypertension (29.6%/23.9%), neutropenia (29.6%/24.7%), and pyrexia (26.8%/4.2%). The research was funded by Bayer AG with medical writing and editorial assistance from Complete HealthVizion Keyword: Indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma Conflicts of interests pertinent to the abstract. M. Dreyling Consultant or advisory role: AstraZeneca, BeiGene, BMS/Celgene, Gilead/Kite, Janssen, Lilly/Loxo, Novartis, Roche Honoraria: AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Gilead/Kite, Janssen, Roche, Lilly, Novartis Research funding: AbbVie, Bayer, BMS/Celgene, Gilead/Kite, Janssen, Roche A. Santoro Consultant or advisory role: BMS (BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB)/SERVIER/GILEAD/PFIZER/EISAI/BAYER/MSD (MERCK SHARP & DOHME), SANOFI/ INCYTE Other remuneration: Speaker's Bureau: TAKEDA/BMS/ROCHE/ABB-VIE/AMGEN/CELGENE/SERVIER/GILEAD/ASTRAZENECA/PFIZER/LILLY/SANDOZ/EISAI/NOVARTIS/BAYER/MSD S. Leppä Consultant or advisory role: Gilead Sciences, Novartis, Roche, BeiGene, Orion Clinical, Incyte, Pfizer, SOBI Honoraria: Gilead Sciences, Novartis, Incyte Research funding: Roche, Bayer, Celgene, Novartis, Genmab, Hutchison MediPharma G. A. Follows Consultant or advisory role: AbbVie, Roche, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Centessa Honoraria: AbbVie, Roche, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Lilly Educational grants: Takeda G. Lenz Employment or leadership position: President elect German Lymphoma Alliance, Board of director German Lymphoma Alliance Consultant or advisory role: Roche, Janssen, Celgene, AstraZeneca, BMS, AbbVie, MorphoSys, Karyopharm, ADC, PentixaPharm, Hexal/Sandoz, Genase, Gilead, Bayer, Novartis, Takeda, NanoString, Incyte, Genmab, Constellation, Miltenyi, Sobi, Immagene, Lilly Honoraria: Roche, Bayer, Takeda, AbbVie, MorphoSys, Hexal/Sandoz, Janssen, Celgene, BMS, Incyte, Sobi Research funding: Roche, Gilead, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Celgene, Novartis, MorphoSys Educational grants: Janssen, BMS, AbbVie P. Panayiotidis Other remuneration: Bayer AG, clinical trial support M. Özcan Research funding: AbbVie, Bayer, Janssen, Roche, Takeda, MSD, Pfizer, Acerta Educational grants: AbbVie M. Kosinova Other remuneration: Bayer AG, clinical trial support M. Provencio Consultant or advisory role: AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb Company, Eli Lilly, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen Global Services, LLC, Laboratorios Pfizer Ltda., Merck, Takeda Oncology. Research funding: Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb Company, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Pierre Fabre Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Takeda Oncology. Educational grants: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb Company, Eli Lilly, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Pierre Fabre Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Other remuneration: PATENTS, ROYALTIES, OTHER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: P201731067. Prognosis methods for patients with folicular lymphoma. España. 16/05/2017. FIBHUPH; PCT/ES2018/070463. Method for designing J. Munoz Consultant or advisory role: Pharmacyclics/AbbVie, Bayer, Gilead/Kite Pharma, Pfizer, Janssen, Juno/Celgene, BMS, Kyowa, Alexion, Fosun Kite, Innovent, Seattle Genetics, Debiopharm, Karyopharm, Genmab, ADC Therapeutics, Epizyme, BeiGene, Servier, Novartis, MorphoSys/Incyte, MEI, Zodiac, TG Therapeutics, Lilly/Loxo Honoraria: Targeted Oncology, OncView, Curio, Kyowa, Physicians' Education Resource, and Seattle Genetics Research funding: Bayer, Gilead/Kite Pharma, Celgene, Merck, Portola, Incyte, Genentech, Pharmacyclics, Seattle Genetics, Janssen, Millennium Other remuneration: Speaker's Bureau: Gilead/Kite Pharma, Kyowa, Bayer, Pharmacyclics/Janssen, Seattle Genetics, Acrotech/Aurobindo, BeiGene, Verastem, AstraZeneca, Celgene/BMS, Genentech/Roche A. Cao Employment or leadership position: Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. F. Hiemeyer Employment or leadership position: Bayer AG F. Odongo Employment or leadership position: Bayer SA J. Garcia-Vargas Employment or leadership position: Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. B. H. Childs Employment or leadership position: Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. P. L. Zinzani Consultant or advisory role: SECURA BIO, CELLTRION, GILEAD, JANSSEN- CILAG, BMS, SERVIER, SANDOZ, MSD, ASTRAZENECA, TAKEDA, ROCHE, EUSAPHARMA, KYOWA KIRIN, NOVARTIS, ADC Therap., Incyte, BeiGene Other remuneration: Speaker's Bureau: CELLTRION, GILEAD, JANSSEN- CILAG, BMS, SERVIER, SANDOZ, MSD, ASTRAZENECA, TAKEDA, ROCHE, EUSAPHARMA, KYOWA KIRIN, NOVARTIS, ADC Therap., Incyte, BeiGene

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.350

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHematological OncologySame topicLymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207