MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4380634236 · doi:10.1111/cag.12861

Harriet's legacies: Race, historical memory, and futures in Canada. By RonaldCummings, NataleeCaple, Montreal: McGill‐Queen's University Press. 2022. pages 440. $37.95 (hardback). ISBN: 978‐0228010654

2023· article· en· W4380634236 sur OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Asha Jeffers

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensDalhousie University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésQueen (butterfly)AshaHistoryRace (biology)CitationFutures contractMedia studiesArt historyLibrary scienceSociologyGender studiesTheologyComputer sciencePhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Published in 2022, almost two centuries since the Underground Railroad's most famous conductor was born, Ronald Cummings and Natalee Caple's Harriet's legacies seeks to explore the ways in which Harriet Tubman, as both a person and a symbol, continues to resonate across time and space. Taking a wide-ranging and deeply interdisciplinary approach to Harriet Tubman's legacies in Canada, Cummings and Caple's edited collection goes about the important and complex work of asserting Canada's place in the African diaspora, as well as the African diaspora's place in Canada. Ever since Black Canada was famously left out of Paul Gilroy's conceptualization of the Black Atlantic, scholars of Black Canada have been writing about and thinking through a dual erasure of Black Canadian experience. On the one hand, Black Canada is often unrecognized by other communities in the African diaspora, constituting an external invisibility. On the other, within Canada, Blackness is often perceived as recent and peripheral to Canadian history, constituting an internal marginalization. In such a context, the way that Cummings and Caple take up Harriet Tubman manages to disrupt both these narratives, by recentring Harriet Tubman as a diasporic rather than simply African American figure and by asserting that Harriet Tubman's time in Canada was important and not outside of her political life, as is sometimes depicted. This volume is timely because, as the editors point out, there has been a resurgence of interest in Harriet Tubman as found in film, television, and popular discourse, particularly online. But rather than focusing on these depictions, the collection heads in a perhaps surprising direction as it situates Harriet Tubman as a starting point for an almost overwhelming variety of approaches to Black Canada, past and present. Some chapters have more obvious connections to Harriet Tubman, like Karolyn Smardz Frost's fascinating chapter “The Cataract House Hotel: Underground to Canada through the Niagara River borderlands,” which concerns the region of Canada that Harriet Tubman lived in, and Afua Cooper's “The miracle of Ann Maria Jackson, slave fugitive and heroine of the Underground Railroad,” which brings a vital gendered lens to historical research about the Underground Railroad. Other chapters approach Harriet Tubman's legacy through creative engagement, notably Kaie Kellough's beautiful “She balances the border” and Alexis Pauline Gumbs’ thoughtful “M is for migrant: Scenes in response to three questions and a statement from M. Jacqui Alexander's Pedagogies of Crossing.” Still others take up the collection's broader mission of disrupting the dual erasure I described through a range of disciplines and discourses. This is in keeping with the editors’ conceptualization of legacy through a framework of diasporic affiliation, which highlights that making connections and kinship can be powerful acts of desire. Chapters in this category are particularly diverse as they include literary and cultural criticism, community history, and medical humanities. Of particular interest to geographers would be Nalini Mohabir's rich “Dionne Brand, map-maker,” which explores Brand's use of maps in her watershed work of creative nonfiction, A map to the door of no return, although the collection's overall meaningful engagement with place and space, both literal and psychic, makes many of the other chapters well worth digging into. The volume's final section, which is primarily concerned with creative cultural production, particularly dub poetry and Black feminist publishing, highlights Harriet's legacies’ final core investment: futurity. The editors rightly assert that the legacies of Harriet Tubman “must be seen at once as ongoing, collective practices of antiracism and freedom seeking” (p. 36). If Harriet Tubman's own life was shaped by an unshakable belief in the possibility of a better future for specific enslaved individuals and for people of African descent more broadly, and I believe it was, then the imperative to be future-facing is a natural outcome of situating oneself within her legacy. Notably, this orientation is based on identifying “the past, present, and future as sites of insecurity” (p. 36); the future is not a space of unbounded possibility but rather is still shaped by the same unsettled forces that have formed the past and present. Yet the collaborative thinking, affiliative longing, and creative visioning that this volume models and brings together powerfully demonstrate how a nonlinear view of legacy can enrich our turn towards the future even in the face of so much uncertainty.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,069
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,503

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0030,008
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0180,011
Communication savante0,0160,007
Science ouverte0,0020,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0360,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,167
Écart entre enseignants0,162 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission3
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes→Même sujetCanadian Identity and History→Travaux en français237 207→