Harriet's legacies: Race, historical memory, and futures in Canada. By RonaldCummings, NataleeCaple, Montreal: McGill‐Queen's University Press. 2022. pages 440. $37.95 (hardback). ISBN: 978‐0228010654
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Published in 2022, almost two centuries since the Underground Railroad's most famous conductor was born, Ronald Cummings and Natalee Caple's Harriet's legacies seeks to explore the ways in which Harriet Tubman, as both a person and a symbol, continues to resonate across time and space. Taking a wide-ranging and deeply interdisciplinary approach to Harriet Tubman's legacies in Canada, Cummings and Caple's edited collection goes about the important and complex work of asserting Canada's place in the African diaspora, as well as the African diaspora's place in Canada. Ever since Black Canada was famously left out of Paul Gilroy's conceptualization of the Black Atlantic, scholars of Black Canada have been writing about and thinking through a dual erasure of Black Canadian experience. On the one hand, Black Canada is often unrecognized by other communities in the African diaspora, constituting an external invisibility. On the other, within Canada, Blackness is often perceived as recent and peripheral to Canadian history, constituting an internal marginalization. In such a context, the way that Cummings and Caple take up Harriet Tubman manages to disrupt both these narratives, by recentring Harriet Tubman as a diasporic rather than simply African American figure and by asserting that Harriet Tubman's time in Canada was important and not outside of her political life, as is sometimes depicted. This volume is timely because, as the editors point out, there has been a resurgence of interest in Harriet Tubman as found in film, television, and popular discourse, particularly online. But rather than focusing on these depictions, the collection heads in a perhaps surprising direction as it situates Harriet Tubman as a starting point for an almost overwhelming variety of approaches to Black Canada, past and present. Some chapters have more obvious connections to Harriet Tubman, like Karolyn Smardz Frost's fascinating chapter “The Cataract House Hotel: Underground to Canada through the Niagara River borderlands,” which concerns the region of Canada that Harriet Tubman lived in, and Afua Cooper's “The miracle of Ann Maria Jackson, slave fugitive and heroine of the Underground Railroad,” which brings a vital gendered lens to historical research about the Underground Railroad. Other chapters approach Harriet Tubman's legacy through creative engagement, notably Kaie Kellough's beautiful “She balances the border” and Alexis Pauline Gumbs’ thoughtful “M is for migrant: Scenes in response to three questions and a statement from M. Jacqui Alexander's Pedagogies of Crossing.” Still others take up the collection's broader mission of disrupting the dual erasure I described through a range of disciplines and discourses. This is in keeping with the editors’ conceptualization of legacy through a framework of diasporic affiliation, which highlights that making connections and kinship can be powerful acts of desire. Chapters in this category are particularly diverse as they include literary and cultural criticism, community history, and medical humanities. Of particular interest to geographers would be Nalini Mohabir's rich “Dionne Brand, map-maker,” which explores Brand's use of maps in her watershed work of creative nonfiction, A map to the door of no return, although the collection's overall meaningful engagement with place and space, both literal and psychic, makes many of the other chapters well worth digging into. The volume's final section, which is primarily concerned with creative cultural production, particularly dub poetry and Black feminist publishing, highlights Harriet's legacies’ final core investment: futurity. The editors rightly assert that the legacies of Harriet Tubman “must be seen at once as ongoing, collective practices of antiracism and freedom seeking” (p. 36). If Harriet Tubman's own life was shaped by an unshakable belief in the possibility of a better future for specific enslaved individuals and for people of African descent more broadly, and I believe it was, then the imperative to be future-facing is a natural outcome of situating oneself within her legacy. Notably, this orientation is based on identifying “the past, present, and future as sites of insecurity” (p. 36); the future is not a space of unbounded possibility but rather is still shaped by the same unsettled forces that have formed the past and present. Yet the collaborative thinking, affiliative longing, and creative visioning that this volume models and brings together powerfully demonstrate how a nonlinear view of legacy can enrich our turn towards the future even in the face of so much uncertainty.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.036 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".