EFFECT OF COGNITIVE REMEDIATION THERAPY PACKAGE ON COGNITIVE FUNCTIONS AND QUALITY OF LIFE AMONG ELDERLY AT SELECTED OLD AGE HOMES
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Old age, also called senescence, in human beings, the nal stage of the normal life span. Cognitive function declines with advancing age particularly in elderly people. Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is an intermediate phase between normal cognitive ageing and overt dementia. ·To assess and compare Objectives: pre & post-test level of cognitive functions and quality of life among elderly before cognitive remediation therapy package, both in experimental and control group.·To evaluate the effectiveness of cognitive remediation therapy package on cognitive functions and quality of life among elderly, both in experimental and control group. To correlate the mean differed score of cognitive functions and quality of life among elderly, both in experimental and control group Methodology: A quasi experimental research design was adopted. After screening a total 20 elderly people, 10 for each experimental and control group were selected were selected by using non probability purposive sampling technique in a selected old age homes. The pre test data was collected through the structured interview schedule, cognitive functions were assessed by Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale and quality of life was assessed by WHO bref scale. Cognitive remediation therapy was given for a period of 6 weeks and post test was conducted. Collected data were analysed by using descriptive and inferential statistics. There Results: was a statistically signicant difference in the post test level of cognitive functions and quality of life after administration of cognitive remediation package. Effectiveness of cognitive remediation therapy package of Cognitive functions score was from 60% to 80%, percentage gain score was 20% and QOL score was from 50% to 66%, percentage gain score was 16%.The comparison mean score was statically signicant in post test cognitive functions and QOL score. (p=0.001). There was a signicant positive fair corelation between cognitive functions and QOL in experimental group, there was a signicant positive poor corelation between cognitive functions and QOL in control group. The overall statisticall Conclusion: y signicant difference in the level cognitive functions and quality of life was revealing the effectiveness of the intervention. Nurse directed cognitive remediation therapy was effective in signicantly enhancing the cognitive functions and quality of life thereby reducing the impact of cognitive impairment among elderly
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».