EFFECT OF COGNITIVE REMEDIATION THERAPY PACKAGE ON COGNITIVE FUNCTIONS AND QUALITY OF LIFE AMONG ELDERLY AT SELECTED OLD AGE HOMES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Old age, also called senescence, in human beings, the nal stage of the normal life span. Cognitive function declines with advancing age particularly in elderly people. Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is an intermediate phase between normal cognitive ageing and overt dementia. ·To assess and compare Objectives: pre & post-test level of cognitive functions and quality of life among elderly before cognitive remediation therapy package, both in experimental and control group.·To evaluate the effectiveness of cognitive remediation therapy package on cognitive functions and quality of life among elderly, both in experimental and control group. To correlate the mean differed score of cognitive functions and quality of life among elderly, both in experimental and control group Methodology: A quasi experimental research design was adopted. After screening a total 20 elderly people, 10 for each experimental and control group were selected were selected by using non probability purposive sampling technique in a selected old age homes. The pre test data was collected through the structured interview schedule, cognitive functions were assessed by Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale and quality of life was assessed by WHO bref scale. Cognitive remediation therapy was given for a period of 6 weeks and post test was conducted. Collected data were analysed by using descriptive and inferential statistics. There Results: was a statistically signicant difference in the post test level of cognitive functions and quality of life after administration of cognitive remediation package. Effectiveness of cognitive remediation therapy package of Cognitive functions score was from 60% to 80%, percentage gain score was 20% and QOL score was from 50% to 66%, percentage gain score was 16%.The comparison mean score was statically signicant in post test cognitive functions and QOL score. (p=0.001). There was a signicant positive fair corelation between cognitive functions and QOL in experimental group, there was a signicant positive poor corelation between cognitive functions and QOL in control group. The overall statisticall Conclusion: y signicant difference in the level cognitive functions and quality of life was revealing the effectiveness of the intervention. Nurse directed cognitive remediation therapy was effective in signicantly enhancing the cognitive functions and quality of life thereby reducing the impact of cognitive impairment among elderly
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".