Notice bibliographique
Résumé
India: A History in Objects is yet another book that tries to understand India through its objects. Yet, an object is more than an object, particularly in India. In addition to a patron and a creator, it likely had an environment that fostered it, a textual source that inspired it, and a timeless creative tradition that sustained it. Such an object creates relationships with objects around it, usually as part of a religious or cultural tradition, meant mainly for its subjective, inward, aesthetic experience.An encyclopedic work like this one can have much to offer about its subject matter even if it lacks academic depth and treats objects of art as mere ephemeral curiosities. To be fair, Blurton makes this point himself at the outset. The title of the book is also a misnomer; the objects are not from every museum that makes a contribution to the history of the subcontinent; it is primarily a guide to the Indian art collection at the British Museum, intended for casual visitors, not for scholars doing serious research. With more than 500 illustrations, the book is a visual delight, despite its lack of academic vigor. Through a bird’s-eye view, Blurton attempts to connect today’s India with its past.Blurton presents a vast chronology from the Indus Civilization to the British Raj, covering many of the intervening dynasties. As mainly a visual tour, with only a simple and attenuated text, it will saturate readers’ eyes more than it will stimulate their intellects. The captions of the images are succinct but sufficient.Blurton does well to include not only objects from the Hindu tradition but also from the Buddhist, Jain, and Islamic traditions, in India as well as elsewhere in the sub-continent. His broad sweep fittingly encompasses objects in daily use, like the pan box and huqqa base; a feature of Indian art is its seamless blending of the quotidian and the classical.By including both photography and objects, Blurton is able to draw attention to a wide variety of art forms. He restores some degree of academic strength to the book via his introductions to such noteworthy chapters as “Dynasties and the Rise of Buddhism,” “Shiva Nataraja,” “Rural Cultures,” and Film and Cinema. By restricting himself to the British Museum, however, he is unable to incorporate significant objects within the genres that he presents. In the section entitled “Paintings From the Punjab Hills,” he makes no reference to Kangra and Raja Sansar Chand, among other places. In the genre of Rajput Paintings, he fails to give the ateliers of Bikaner, Kishangarh, Bundi, et al. their due. The chapter about Ragamala paintings makes no mention of the Ragamala texts or the seed mantras from which the paintings emanated. The absence of any allusion to underlying, seminal primary works—whether temples, poetry, paintings, or sculpture—is a consistent problem in the book. A comprehensive bibliography would have been helpful to serious students of Indian art.Overall, this book belongs on a coffee table rather than on a library bookshelf, but it makes enjoyable reading, lightly touching many objects and their histories. Readers can open the book to any page and embark on a pleasure trip. The book will certainly appeal to anyone interested in the long history of beautiful objects created on the Indian sub-continent.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,007 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».