MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381416244 · doi:10.1162/jinh_r_01947

<i>India: A History in Objects</i> by T. Richard Blurton

2023· article· en· W4381416244 on OpenAlexaff
Harsha V. Dehejia

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Interdisciplinary History · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAnthropological Studies and Insights
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCasualMisnomerObject (grammar)CivilizationHistorySubject (documents)IndusAestheticsLiteratureSociologyVisual artsArtPhilosophyLawComputer scienceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

India: A History in Objects is yet another book that tries to understand India through its objects. Yet, an object is more than an object, particularly in India. In addition to a patron and a creator, it likely had an environment that fostered it, a textual source that inspired it, and a timeless creative tradition that sustained it. Such an object creates relationships with objects around it, usually as part of a religious or cultural tradition, meant mainly for its subjective, inward, aesthetic experience.An encyclopedic work like this one can have much to offer about its subject matter even if it lacks academic depth and treats objects of art as mere ephemeral curiosities. To be fair, Blurton makes this point himself at the outset. The title of the book is also a misnomer; the objects are not from every museum that makes a contribution to the history of the subcontinent; it is primarily a guide to the Indian art collection at the British Museum, intended for casual visitors, not for scholars doing serious research. With more than 500 illustrations, the book is a visual delight, despite its lack of academic vigor. Through a bird’s-eye view, Blurton attempts to connect today’s India with its past.Blurton presents a vast chronology from the Indus Civilization to the British Raj, covering many of the intervening dynasties. As mainly a visual tour, with only a simple and attenuated text, it will saturate readers’ eyes more than it will stimulate their intellects. The captions of the images are succinct but sufficient.Blurton does well to include not only objects from the Hindu tradition but also from the Buddhist, Jain, and Islamic traditions, in India as well as elsewhere in the sub-continent. His broad sweep fittingly encompasses objects in daily use, like the pan box and huqqa base; a feature of Indian art is its seamless blending of the quotidian and the classical.By including both photography and objects, Blurton is able to draw attention to a wide variety of art forms. He restores some degree of academic strength to the book via his introductions to such noteworthy chapters as “Dynasties and the Rise of Buddhism,” “Shiva Nataraja,” “Rural Cultures,” and Film and Cinema. By restricting himself to the British Museum, however, he is unable to incorporate significant objects within the genres that he presents. In the section entitled “Paintings From the Punjab Hills,” he makes no reference to Kangra and Raja Sansar Chand, among other places. In the genre of Rajput Paintings, he fails to give the ateliers of Bikaner, Kishangarh, Bundi, et al. their due. The chapter about Ragamala paintings makes no mention of the Ragamala texts or the seed mantras from which the paintings emanated. The absence of any allusion to underlying, seminal primary works—whether temples, poetry, paintings, or sculpture—is a consistent problem in the book. A comprehensive bibliography would have been helpful to serious students of Indian art.Overall, this book belongs on a coffee table rather than on a library bookshelf, but it makes enjoyable reading, lightly touching many objects and their histories. Readers can open the book to any page and embark on a pleasure trip. The book will certainly appeal to anyone interested in the long history of beautiful objects created on the Indian sub-continent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0080.007
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Interdisciplinary HistorySame topicAnthropological Studies and InsightsFrench-language works237,207