Notice bibliographique
Résumé
russell: the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies n.s. (winter –): – The Bertrand Russell Research Centre, McMaster U. issn –; online – c:\users\ken\documents\type\red \rj red.docx -- : Reviews RUSSELL’S LIFE, LEGACY AND WORK Stefan Andersson stefankarlandersson@live.com Peter Stone, ed. Bertrand Russell’s Life and Legacy. Foreword by Tony Simpson . (Vernon Series in Philosophy.) Wilmington, de: Vernon P., . Pp. xvii, . isbn: ----. us$ (hb), us$ (pb), e-book $. eter Stone has been a member of the Bertrand Russell Society for over twenty years and recently served as its Vice President. His latest contribution to Russell studies, Bertrand Russell’s Life and Legacy, is an interesting collection of essays that consists of nine articles divided into four parts plus a foreword by Tony Simpson, who is the current head of the Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation. In his foreword Simpson quotes from Russell’s statement on the Middle East dated January , which was read on February, the day after Bertrand Russell’s death, to an International Conference of Parliamentarians meeting in Cairo. Since I came to know and befriend International Law jurist Richard Falk, who served as the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the situation in Palestine between and and have since read many of his books and articles plus sat in on several courses at Lund University on the conflict between the Israeli Government and the Palestinians, I am glad that Simpson brought up this topic. I am impressed by how sharp-sighted Russell was up to the end of a long life committed to political activism for peace and justice. When Russell said: “The tragedy of the people of Palestine is that their country was ‘given’ by a foreign Power to another people for the creation of a new State”,1 he pointed to the root of the problem. If Russell had been alive today, he would have condemned the recent killing of Jews in Pittsburgh, but even more lamented the murder of hundreds of unarmed young Palestinians protesting the Israeli’s Government’s policy and its Defence Forces’ enforcement of that policy. All his life Russell was a supporter of the underdog, and it is good to be able to listen to his cries for justice beyond the grave. 1 The Spokesman, no. (April ): . P Reviews c:\users\ken\documents\type\red \rj red.docx -- : The title of Life and Legacy is so encompassing that it is hard to exclude Russell’s work itself. This is particularly true for the articles in the second part, “Russell’s Philosophical World”, but also for the editor’s own contribution “Philosophical Biography Reconsidered”. I will return to this in dealing with Stone’s essay. The first part, “Russell the Man”, consists of two articles. The first “An Affair Remembered: Bertrand Russell and Joan Follwell, –”, which is by Eileen O’Mara Walsh and deals with her mother’s—Joan Follwell O’Mara’s—brief affair with Russell. Walsh published her own memoirs, The Third Daughter, in . In light of what has been revealed by the #MeToo movement, it is not more than fair that Russell’s many “affairs” should be scrutinized and evaluated. Although I have no reason to believe that Russell ever forced himself on any woman, there is still room for some unbiased reflections regarding the difference between using one’s position as a famous and influential person to help others in their careers and liberate them from outdated moral standards, and misusing it, even according to one’s own moral principles, which might create a painful sense of guilt and shame, which is often eased by equal portions of forgetting, repression, denial and inventing “alternative facts”. Russell’s relationship with women, and how he documented his experiences of them and talked about them, have always interested me. I include his two grandmothers, his mother, sister and paternal aunt plus his daughter, Katharine, who had four boys and one daughter,2 and his other three granddaughters that his first son, John, “blessed” him with, although one of them 2 During my year at Harvard Divinity School in –, I met Katharine alone a couple of times, since she lived close by the school...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,012 |
| Communication savante | 0,011 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».