MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381949034 · doi:10.1353/rss.2018.0003

Russell’s Life, Legacy and Work

2018· article· en· W4381949034 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Stefan Andersson

Bibliographic record

VenueRussell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClassicsHistoryGovernment (linguistics)Art historyLawPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

russell: the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies n.s.  (winter –): – The Bertrand Russell Research Centre, McMaster U. issn –; online – c:\users\ken\documents\type\red \rj   red.docx -- : Reviews RUSSELL’S LIFE, LEGACY AND WORK Stefan Andersson stefankarlandersson@live.com Peter Stone, ed. Bertrand Russell’s Life and Legacy. Foreword by Tony Simpson . (Vernon Series in Philosophy.) Wilmington, de: Vernon P., . Pp. xvii, . isbn: ----. us$ (hb), us$ (pb), e-book $. eter Stone has been a member of the Bertrand Russell Society for over twenty years and recently served as its Vice President. His latest contribution to Russell studies, Bertrand Russell’s Life and Legacy, is an interesting collection of essays that consists of nine articles divided into four parts plus a foreword by Tony Simpson, who is the current head of the Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation. In his foreword Simpson quotes from Russell’s statement on the Middle East dated  January , which was read on  February, the day after Bertrand Russell’s death, to an International Conference of Parliamentarians meeting in Cairo. Since I came to know and befriend International Law jurist Richard Falk, who served as the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the situation in Palestine between  and  and have since read many of his books and articles plus sat in on several courses at Lund University on the conflict between the Israeli Government and the Palestinians, I am glad that Simpson brought up this topic. I am impressed by how sharp-sighted Russell was up to the end of a long life committed to political activism for peace and justice. When Russell said: “The tragedy of the people of Palestine is that their country was ‘given’ by a foreign Power to another people for the creation of a new State”,1 he pointed to the root of the problem. If Russell had been alive today, he would have condemned the recent killing of Jews in Pittsburgh, but even more lamented the murder of hundreds of unarmed young Palestinians protesting the Israeli’s Government’s policy and its Defence Forces’ enforcement of that policy. All his life Russell was a supporter of the underdog, and it is good to be able to listen to his cries for justice beyond the grave. 1 The Spokesman, no.  (April ): . P  Reviews c:\users\ken\documents\type\red \rj   red.docx -- : The title of Life and Legacy is so encompassing that it is hard to exclude Russell’s work itself. This is particularly true for the articles in the second part, “Russell’s Philosophical World”, but also for the editor’s own contribution “Philosophical Biography Reconsidered”. I will return to this in dealing with Stone’s essay. The first part, “Russell the Man”, consists of two articles. The first “An Affair Remembered: Bertrand Russell and Joan Follwell, –”, which is by Eileen O’Mara Walsh and deals with her mother’s—Joan Follwell O’Mara’s—brief affair with Russell. Walsh published her own memoirs, The Third Daughter, in . In light of what has been revealed by the #MeToo movement, it is not more than fair that Russell’s many “affairs” should be scrutinized and evaluated. Although I have no reason to believe that Russell ever forced himself on any woman, there is still room for some unbiased reflections regarding the difference between using one’s position as a famous and influential person to help others in their careers and liberate them from outdated moral standards, and misusing it, even according to one’s own moral principles, which might create a painful sense of guilt and shame, which is often eased by equal portions of forgetting, repression, denial and inventing “alternative facts”. Russell’s relationship with women, and how he documented his experiences of them and talked about them, have always interested me. I include his two grandmothers, his mother, sister and paternal aunt plus his daughter, Katharine, who had four boys and one daughter,2 and his other three granddaughters that his first son, John, “blessed” him with, although one of them 2 During my year at Harvard Divinity School in –, I met Katharine alone a couple of times, since she lived close by the school...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.012
Scholarly communication0.0110.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussell the Journal of Bertrand Russell StudiesSame topicJewish and Middle Eastern StudiesFrench-language works237,207