Employability Skills, Career Assessment, and Work Performance Among Hospitality Graduates
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This survey-correlational study aimed to determine employability skills, career assessment, and work performance among hospitality graduates. The study utilized 51 randomly selected hospitality graduates of Iloilo State College of Fisheries, main campus. Simple random sampling was employed in the selection of the participants. The investigation used three (3) published data-gathering instruments to obtain the data for the study, the Employability Skills Assessment Questionnaire by the Conference Board of Canada (2016), the Career Factor Experience Questionnaire for Hospitality Management Graduates by Brown (2011), and the Employee Performance Evaluation by the University of California (2010). The data were analyzed using rank, mean, frequency count, percentage analysis, standard deviation, t-test, and Pearson's r. The .05 level of significance was used in the inferential analysis. The study's findings revealed that the most dominantly manifested employability skills among hospitality graduates were learning skills. They had high career preferences and outstanding work performance. Significant differences existed in their employability skills when they were classified according to industry employment. However, no significant differences were noted when classified according to sex, age, civil status, course graduated, job status, and industry experience. Significant differences existed in their career assessment when they were classified according to job status. However, no significant differences were noted when they were classified according to sex, age, civil status, course graduated, industry employment, and industry experience. Significant differences existed in their work performance when they were classified according to sex. However, no significant differences were noted when they were classified according to age, civil status, course graduated, job status, industry employment, and industry experience. A positive but not significant relationship existed among employability skills, career assessment, and work performance of hospitality graduates.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».