Understanding the Origin of Lithiophilicity Toward Molten Li-Metal Using <i>In-situ</i> Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Maintaining a uniform Li deposition at the anode electrode/electrolyte interface is a fundamental challenge during extended cycling of solid-state Li batteries. The reactivity of the Li metal at the current collector surface remains a principal parameter for battery optimization. It is known that a bare Cu foil current collector substrate does not have a good lithiophilic surface to deposit molten Li metal because the Cu surface’s wettability by a Li metal melt is very poor, requiring a metal or metal oxide interlayer to improve wetting [1, 2]. Zn is considered one of the most promising lithiophilic elements. In this work, we used in-situ scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to study the interfacial reactions between molten Li metal and Cu foil current collector modified by a thin Zn film (Cu@Zn) to understand the origin of lithiophilicity. We performed in-situ heating tests on a Cu foil substrate coated with a 50 nm Zn interlayer (Cu@Zn) in contact with a Li metal foil in SEM. We present experimental heating and cooling set ups for in-situ Li study inside a high vacuum SEM. We present our observations of the reaction between the molten Li metal and Cu surface during Li solidification in real time as well as post-mortem energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) and grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXRD) on the coatings to analyze the chemistry of the reaction products. For the first time in literature, our in-situ study shows the existence of a metastable ternary Li-Cu-Zn alloy at 300 °C after the reaction of Cu@Zn with the molten Li metal. We report the segregation of Cu and Zn by formation of Cu-Zn intermetallic compounds during the cooling down step. The schematic of the experimental set up for in-situ heating tests inside the SEM in Figure 1 shows the in-situ SEM observation (top view) of Li metal wettability of a Cu@50nm (nominal thickness) Zn foil substrate in contact with a molten Li metal at 300 °C. We observed the wettability of the Cu@Zn foil near the edges of the Li metal foil where the molten Li metal contacted the substrate. Subsequently, the in-situ SEM observation (top view) of Li metastability showed formation of secondary phase particles on the Li surface during Li solidification. Figure 2A-B show the top view snapshots of the Cu@Zn and metallic Li surface observed in in-situ settings. The Li surface microstructure of the same area (indicated by the red circle in Figure 2B) at 300 °C and after cool down to RT are shown in Figure 2C-D. We will discuss these results in the context of the understanding the chemical reactivity of molten Li toward metal foils. Utilizing in-situ SEM is pivotal to clarify the interfacial reactions occurring between a lithiophilic current collector and molten Li metal and have utmost importance for designing advanced new anode materials for future solid-state battery applications. Schematic of the in-situ heating set up inside the scanning electron microscope (SEM). Top view snapshot of the Cu@Zn foil substrate (A), top view snapshot of the metallic Li foil (B), the Li surface microstructure at 300 °C (C) and after cool down to RT (D). The backscattered electron (BSE) images in (C-D) were taken from the same area indicated in red in (B) at the same magnification.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».